connatix.com 69 C
🛡️ SEO 48 🤖 GEO 79 ⚡ Perf 59 🏗️ Arch 90

connatix.com — Global SEODiff Score 69/100

connatix.com
📊

The AI-Readiness profile for connatix.com is strong: an ACRI of 73/100 places it ahead of 75% of domains in the index. In the infrastructure sector, connatix.com outperforms the average (58), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. While the majority of content is server-rendered, the 15% ghost ratio suggests some content remains invisible to static crawlers. Token bloat registers at 7.5× — acceptable, but reducing inline scripts and redundant markup could yield measurable gains. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

69
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (48) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Fix title tag length → +3 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 28, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 24 snapshots
Feb 22 Feb 28
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than connatix.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)48 × 0.25 = 12.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)79 × 0.40 = 31.6
⚡ Performance (20% weight)59 × 0.20 = 11.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)90 × 0.15 = 13.5
Weighted sum = 12.0 + 31.6 + 11.8 + 13.5
Global SEODiff Score = 69 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
94
Rendering
avg 93
40
Structure
avg 36
42
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.2%
Rank #1885
+25 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 25%
Score 73/100

connatix.com punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why connatix.com ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat7.5×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

48/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

86 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

153 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 2
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 7
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://jwx.com
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Video technology & monetization platform for streamers, publishers & advertisers | JWX
  • ✓ og:description — JWX helps streamers, publishers, and advertisers create, deliver, and monetize video with one intelligent workflow - built for speed, scale, and results.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

79/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
connatix.com
55
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 15%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 40/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 54 elements (54 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1106
Raw Density4.9%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

1/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

59
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability59/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

13%
🗑️ 87%
Useful Content (20.4 KB)Bloat (133.2 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio7.5× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage31 / 31 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 86.7% · SNR: 0.15 · Signal: 5228 / Noise: 34110 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

A local LLM (mlx-community/gemma-3-4b-it-qat-4bit) analyzed the extracted content of connatix.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
JWX provides a privacy notice outlining the company's collection and processing of personal information from job applicants, including details on
Target Audience
Job applicants, legal professionals, HR professionals, compliance officers
Pricing Model
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
🛡️ Compliance Standards
GDPRCCPA
🏆 Competitive Moat
Comprehensive privacy notice addressing data protection regulations and applicant rights.
📊 Content Depth
9/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Privacy notice templateData protection compliance page
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Complex legal language
• Lack of transparency regarding data sharing
• Potential for non-compliance with data privacy regulations
Model: mlx-community/gemma-3-4b-it-qat-4bit · Analyzed: 2026-02-28 · Data extracted from the site’s main content via strict JSON prompting.

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time759 ms
Raw HTML Size153.7 KB
Visible Text Size20.4 KB

Performance & Speed

59/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

759 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1048
DOM nodes
154 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → s-maxage=36000, max-age=5
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

90/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://connatix.com/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

6
internal links
75
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 55/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for connatix.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/connatix.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=connatix.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 12 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
55
Single-page score
-22
Severe hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
34
Avg across 12 pages · Range 19–85
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 55, but internal pages average only 34 — a -22-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Topical Cohesion
8%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
3561
Avg Bloat
128.0×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://connatix.com/job-applicant-privacy-policy
Job Applicant Privacy Notice | JWX
legal 85 6.1× 2524
https://connatix.com/blog
Blog | JWX
blog 54 44.7× 488
https://connatix.com/press
News | JWX
other 54 45.4× 391
https://connatix.com/copyright
Legal Resources | JWX
other 44 128.9× 134
https://connatix.com/contact
Contact Us | JWX
support 34 611.2× 24
https://connatix.com/about about 19 100.0× 0
https://connatix.com/products product 19 100.0× 0
https://connatix.com/features product 19 100.0× 0
https://connatix.com/docs docs 19 100.0× 0
https://connatix.com/case-studies social-proof 19 100.0× 0
https://connatix.com/faq support 19 100.0× 0
https://connatix.com/integrations integrations 19 100.0× 0
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/integrations/ 1 19 1% 100.0× Bot Blocked
/blog/ 1 54 0% 44.7× High JS Bloat
/copyright/ 1 44 0% 128.9× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 19 1% 100.0× Bot Blocked
/products/ 1 19 1% 100.0× Bot Blocked
/docs/ 1 19 1% 100.0× Bot Blocked
/case-studies/ 1 19 1% 100.0× Bot Blocked
/faq/ 1 19 1% 100.0× Bot Blocked
/job-applicant-privacy-policy/ 1 85 0% 6.0× High JS Bloat
/press/ 1 54 0% 45.4× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 34 0% 611.2× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 19 1% 100.0× Bot Blocked
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/connatix.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to connatix.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
connatix.com (this site) 55 73 Custom / Proprietary 7.5× 1
freedom.net 80 84 Custom / Proprietary 1.9× 1 Compare →
ampir.ru 80 86 Custom / Proprietary 3.3× 2 Compare →
myparking.it 80 86 Custom / Proprietary 2.6× 2 Compare →
ducfarm.ro 80 85 Custom / Proprietary 4.2× 3 Compare →
steerlink.co.jp 80 85 Custom / Proprietary 2.3× 2 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🎭

Bait & Switch Delta

A 12 PAGES

Compares your homepage rendering quality with inner pages. A high drift score means AI crawlers see a polished homepage but degraded inner content — the "bait & switch" that erodes trust.

19
Homepage ACRI
35
Inner Avg ACRI
-16
ACRI Delta
90%
Homepage Ghost
64%
Inner Avg Ghost
6
Drift Score [?]
Worst Inner Pages
19 90% product https://connatix.com/features
19 90% product https://connatix.com/products
19 90% docs https://connatix.com/docs
🛡️

E-E-A-T Trust Signals

C 40/100

Trust indicators extracted from surface pages. These signals help AI systems verify your site's Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness.

Physical Address
Phone Number
Email Contact
About Page
Contact Page
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Named Leadership
🔗

Citation Profile

7 DOMAINS

Outbound citation patterns across surface-crawled pages. Sites that cite diverse, authoritative sources signal higher E-E-A-T to AI systems.

35
Total Links
7
Unique Domains
2.9
Avg/Page
20%
Diversity
jwx.com dashboard.jwplayer.com portal.connatix.com x.com linkedin.com instagram.com support.jwplayer.com
🏘️ Outbound Neighborhood Trust Avg Trust: 37.9

AI trust scores for the domains connatix.com links to. Citing high-trust sources lifts your own credibility signal.

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to connatix.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Connatix",
  "url": "https://connatix.com",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://connatix.com/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Connatix?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Connatix does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Connatix work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Connatix."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for connatix.com:

Current Score
73
Projected Score
83
Improvement
+10 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history