comparic.pl 62 C
🛡️ SEO 63 🤖 GEO 74 ⚡ Perf 22 🏗️ Arch 83

comparic.pl — Global SEODiff Score 62/100

comparic.pl
📊

At 63/100, comparic.pl falls in the moderate bracket of AI-Readiness, suggesting its content is partially accessible to AI systems but not fully optimized. Within the saas vertical, this places comparic.pl above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. The 7.3× token bloat ratio falls within the normal range, though there is room to trim navigation, footer, and script overhead. The site includes 3 schema blocks, providing adequate structured data for basic entity recognition. Partial bot access means the domain is visible to some AI systems but not accessible to others — ClaudeBot remain blocked.

62
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (22) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 28, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than comparic.pl?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)63 × 0.25 = 15.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)74 × 0.40 = 29.6
⚡ Performance (20% weight)22 × 0.20 = 4.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)83 × 0.15 = 12.4
Weighted sum = 15.8 + 29.6 + 4.4 + 12.4
Global SEODiff Score = 62 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
60
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
25
Structure
avg 36
46
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 7%
Rank #71904
+41 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 48%
Score 63/100

comparic.pl punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why comparic.pl ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
Industrysaas
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage3 blocks
Token bloat7.3×

Fastest improvements

  • Allow ClaudeBot (many assistants rely on it) — blocking it often correlates with “AI invisibility.”
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

63/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

32 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

95 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 7
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://comparic.pl/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → pl-PL
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Comparic – Portal finansowy - kursy walut, notowania akcji, biznes w Polsce
  • ✓ og:description — Informacje finansowe z Polski i ze świata. Analizy walut, indeksów, surowców oraz akcji GPW.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

74/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the saas sector, gp-auto.com.ua (ACRI: 84) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
comparic.pl
54
Your ACRI Score
84
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. gp-auto.com.ua has schema coverage of 2 blocks and uses Cloudflare Pages. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Blocked
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Blocked
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed
💡ClaudeBot is blocked. To be cited by Claude, allow ClaudeBot in robots.txt.

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 25/100 — Low
Structured Elements 96 elements (95 lists, 1 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words5235
Raw Density1.8%
💡Low structure score (25/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 95 list items, 1 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks3 blocks

Schema Coverage Map

4/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
✅ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

58
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
Medium
Blocklist Risk
Extractability58/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (85/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskMedium — 2 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

13%
🗑️ 87%
Useful Content (85.2 KB)Bloat (537.6 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio7.3× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context38% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage29 / 77 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Only 38% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 86.3% · SNR: 0.16 · Signal: 21803 / Noise: 137624 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

A local LLM (mlx-community/gemma-3-4b-it-qat-4bit) analyzed the extracted content of comparic.pl and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Comparic.pl is a financial portal providing rankings and reviews of forex brokers, cryptocurrency exchanges, and other financial institutions, aiming to
Target Audience
Retail investors, traders, and individuals seeking to understand and compare financial services, particularly brokers and exchanges.
Pricing Model
No explicit pricing model is stated. The portal relies on affiliate links and potential broker commissions for revenue.
🔗 Integration Partners
XTBForex.comCapital.comJust2TradeInstaForexFP MarketsTickmillCMC Markets
🏆 Competitive Moat
The company’s competitive advantage lies in its extensive network of broker relationships, providing in-depth reviews and personalized recommendations, combined with a focus on user-centric testing and analysis.
📊 Content Depth
8/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Ranking pages for various brokers and exchangesTemplate-generated pages for broker reviews and comparisons
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of structured FAQ schema
• Thin landing pages for features
• Reliance on manual content creation and broker relationships
Model: mlx-community/gemma-3-4b-it-qat-4bit · Analyzed: 2026-03-04 · Data extracted from the site’s main content via strict JSON prompting.

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time7285 ms
Raw HTML Size622.8 KB
Visible Text Size85.2 KB

Performance & Speed

22/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

7285 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

2877
DOM nodes
623 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → no-cache, no-store, must-revalidate
  • ✓ CDN cache status → DYNAMIC
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

83/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://comparic.pl/sitemap_index.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✗ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

478
internal links
22
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → pl-PL
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 54/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for comparic.pl
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/comparic.pl" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=comparic.pl" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 52 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
54
Single-page score
+4
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
59
Avg across 52 pages · Range 54–69
Topical Cohesion
11%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
20851
Avg Bloat
104.2×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://comparic.pl/witam-na-comparic-pl/
Witamy na Comparic.pl - Comparic
pricing 69 50.3× 863 💰 Pricing
https://comparic.pl/komentarz-z-dnia-25-pazdziernika-2012-r/
Komentarz z dnia 25 października 2012 r. - Comparic
pricing 69 82.6× 511 💰 Pricing
https://comparic.pl/komentarz-z-dnia-31-pazdziernika-2012-r/
Komentarz z dnia 31 października 2012 r. - Comparic
pricing 59 107.4× 387 💰 Pricing
https://comparic.pl/komentarz-z-dnia-13-listopada-2012/
Komentarz z dnia 13 listopada 2012 - Comparic
pricing 59 108.1× 392 💰 Pricing
https://comparic.pl/eurusd-odbija-od-wsprarcia-na-1-3020/
EUR/USD odbija od wsparcia na 1.3020 - Comparic
pricing 59 110.0× 391 💰 Pricing
https://comparic.pl/podsumowanie-sesji-7-listopada-2012/
Podsumowanie sesji 7 listopada 2012 - Comparic
pricing 59 100.0× 428 💰 Pricing
https://comparic.pl/komentarz-z-dnia-12-grudnia-2012/
Komentarz z dnia 12 grudnia 2012 - Comparic
pricing 59 109.7× 387 💰 Pricing
https://comparic.pl/komentarz-z-dnia-26-pazdziernika-2012-r/
Komentarz z dnia 26 października 2012 r. - Comparic
pricing 59 98.6× 422 💰 Pricing
https://comparic.pl/komentarz-z-dnia-29-pazdziernika-2012-r/
Komentarz z dnia 29 października 2012 r. - Comparic
pricing 59 101.8× 409 💰 Pricing
https://comparic.pl/komentarz-z-dnia-30-pazdziernika-2012-r/
Komentarz z dnia 30 października 2012 r. - Comparic
pricing 59 98.9× 421 💰 Pricing
https://comparic.pl/komentarz-z-dnia-5-listopada-2012-r/
Komentarz z dnia 5 listopada 2012 r. - Comparic
pricing 59 105.3× 395 💰 Pricing
https://comparic.pl/komentarz-z-dnia-6-listopada-2012-r/
Komentarz z dnia 6 listopada 2012 r. - Comparic
pricing 59 103.5× 402 💰 Pricing
https://comparic.pl/komentarz-z-dnia-2-listopada-2012-r/
Komentarz z dnia 2 listopada 2012 r. - Comparic
pricing 59 107.6× 386 💰 Pricing
https://comparic.pl/komentarz-z-dnia-7-listopada-2012/
Komentarz z dnia 7 listopada 2012 - Comparic
pricing 59 120.6× 351 💰 Pricing
https://comparic.pl/komentarz-z-dnia-8-listopada-2012/
Komentarz z dnia 8 listopada 2012 - Comparic
pricing 59 99.9× 425 💰 Pricing
https://comparic.pl/komentarz-z-dnia-12-listopada-2012/
Komentarz z dnia 12 listopada 2012 - Comparic
pricing 59 121.2× 349 💰 Pricing
https://comparic.pl/komentarz-z-dnia-14-listopada-2012/
Komentarz z dnia 14 listopada 2012 - Comparic
pricing 59 110.1× 385 💰 Pricing
https://comparic.pl/komentarz-z-dnia-15-listopada-2012/
Komentarz z dnia 15 listopada 2012 - Comparic
pricing 59 100.6× 422 💰 Pricing
https://comparic.pl/komentarz-z-dnia-16-listopada/
Komentarz z dnia 16 listopada 2012 - Comparic
pricing 59 116.8× 363 💰 Pricing
https://comparic.pl/komentarz-z-dnia-20-listopada-2012/
Komentarz z dnia 20 listopada 2012 - Comparic
pricing 59 105.8× 402 💰 Pricing
Showing 20 of 52 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/opcje-wygasajace-12-grudnia-2012/ 1 59 0% 122.1× High JS Bloat
/komentarz-z-dnia-14-grudnia-2012/ 1 59 0% 108.6× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 1 57 0% 8.3× High JS Bloat
/recenzja-szkolenia-price-action/ 1 54 0% 105.8× High JS Bloat
/komentarz-z-dnia-31-pazdziernika-2012-r/ 1 59 0% 107.4× High JS Bloat
/podsumowanie-sesji-7-listopada-2012/ 1 59 0% 100.0× High JS Bloat
/komentarz-z-dnia-26-listopada-2012/ 1 59 0% 119.5× High JS Bloat
/komentarz-z-dnia-27-listopada-2012/ 1 59 0% 106.5× High JS Bloat
/komentarz-z-dnia-30-listopada-2012/ 1 59 0% 105.3× High JS Bloat
/komentarz-z-dnia-4-grudnia-2012/ 1 59 0% 113.6× High JS Bloat
/komentarz-z-dnia-7-grudnia-2012/ 1 59 0% 111.2× High JS Bloat
/recenzja-szkolenia-dane-makro-vs-rynki-finansowe-jak-to-grac/ 1 54 0% 97.6× High JS Bloat
/komentarz-z-dnia-20-listopada-2012/ 1 59 0% 105.8× High JS Bloat
/komentarz-z-dnia-6-grudnia-2012/ 1 59 0% 106.1× High JS Bloat
/poranna-analiza-eurusd-2/ 1 59 0% 105.8× High JS Bloat
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/comparic.pl

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar saas Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to comparic.pl. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
comparic.pl (this site) 54 63 WordPress 7.3× 3
sapporochuo.goguynet.jp 77 84 WordPress 3.3× 1 Compare →
sapporotoyohira-kiyota-minami.goguynet.jp 79 84 WordPress 3.4× 1 Compare →
sapporokitaku.goguynet.jp 79 84 WordPress 3.3× 1 Compare →
sapporohigashi.goguynet.jp 79 84 WordPress 3.3× 1 Compare →
sapporonishi-teine.goguynet.jp 79 84 WordPress 3.3× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite comparic.pl when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to comparic.pl. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Allow ClaudeBot in robots.txt
Medium Impact ⏱ 2 min
ClaudeBot is restricted — Claude may not be able to cite your content. Many AI assistants rely on it.
text
User-agent: ClaudeBot
Allow: /

User-agent: anthropic-ai
Allow: /
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Comparic?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Comparic does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Comparic work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Comparic."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for comparic.pl:

Current Score
63
Projected Score
74
Improvement
+11 pts
Allow ClaudeBot +5 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history