chargemap.com 63 C
🛡️ SEO 67 🤖 GEO 66 ⚡ Perf 47 🏗️ Arch 69

chargemap.com — Global SEODiff Score 63/100

chargemap.com
📊

chargemap.com shows strong AI visibility with an ACRI of 81/100, outperforming 95% of indexed domains. Compared to other infrastructure sites (avg score: 57), chargemap.com performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. A 37.9× token bloat ratio means crawlers must process significantly more tokens to reach the actual content — a drag on extraction efficiency. Minimal structured data (1 block) limits the site's ability to communicate entity relationships to AI systems. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

63
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (47) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (38×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 28, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 4 snapshots
Feb 23 Feb 28
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than chargemap.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)67 × 0.25 = 16.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)66 × 0.40 = 26.4
⚡ Performance (20% weight)47 × 0.20 = 9.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)69 × 0.15 = 10.3
Weighted sum = 16.8 + 26.4 + 9.4 + 10.3
Global SEODiff Score = 63 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
97
Rendering
avg 93
75
Structure
avg 36
42
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 7%
Rank #66642
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 5%
Score 81/100

chargemap.com has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why chargemap.com ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat37.9×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

67/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

47 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

131 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 10
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://chargemap.com/en-gb
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-GB
  • ✓ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Chargemap - charging stations for electric cars
  • ✓ og:description — Find charging stations for your electric car anywhere in the world. Check-out the Chargemap Pass : the multi-network charging pass.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

66/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, plodopitomnik-sad.ru (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
chargemap.com
58
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. plodopitomnik-sad.ru has schema coverage of 12 blocks and uses Express. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 10%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 75/100 — Good
Structured Elements 95 elements (95 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words561
Raw Density16.9%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

60
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability60/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (45/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

2%
🗑️ 98%
Useful Content (4.2 KB)Bloat (154.3 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio37.9× — Bloated

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context95% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage18 / 19 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 158.5 KB, but only 4.2 KB is text. 2% useful / 98% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (37.9×) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 97.4% · SNR: 0.03 · Signal: 1070 / Noise: 39513 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of chargemap.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Chargemap provides a platform for electric vehicle drivers to share charging station information and plan routes.
Target Audience
Electric vehicle drivers, EV owners, EV enthusiasts
Pricing Model
Chargemap Pass (RFID card access), potential future premium features.
🏆 Competitive Moat
Community-driven charging station database and RFID card access system.
📊 Content Depth
6/10
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-03

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time1135 ms
Raw HTML Size158.5 KB
Visible Text Size4.2 KB

Performance & Speed

47/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1135 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

860
DOM nodes
158 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✓ CDN cache status → DYNAMIC
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

69/100 15 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

127
internal links
31
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-GB
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 58/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for chargemap.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/chargemap.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=chargemap.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 56 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
58
Single-page score
+8
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
67
Avg across 56 pages · Range 44–80
Topical Cohesion
27%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
61852
Avg Bloat
43.0×
RAG Fractures [?]
8
⚠️
8 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 8 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://chargemap.com/fr-fr/blog/guides/bien-recharger-sa-voiture-electrique
Recharger sa voiture électrique : prix, connecteurs et conseils
pricing 80 11.8× 4034 💰 Pricing
https://chargemap.com/de-de/blog/guides/leitfaden-e-aufladung
Anleitung zum Laden von Elektrofahrzeugen: Kosten, Anschlüsse und Tipps
pricing 80 13.8× 3451 💰 Pricing
https://chargemap.com/en-gb/blog/guides/ev-charging-complete-guide
EV Charging Guide: Costs, Connectors & Tips
pricing 80 13.2× 3545 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://chargemap.com/fr-fr/blog/articles/classement-2026-meilleurs-reseaux-recharge
Classement 2026 des meilleurs réseaux de recharge
pricing 77 19.0× 1869 💰 Pricing
https://chargemap.com/fr-fr/blog/articles/10-arguments-contre-la-voiture-electrique
10 arguments contre la voiture électrique : comment y répondre ?
pricing 77 19.7× 1744 💰 Pricing
https://chargemap.com/fr-fr/blog/articles/chargemap-tour-2024
Chargemap vient à votre rencontre sur les stations de recharge
pricing 72 31.6× 1065 💰 Pricing
https://chargemap.com/fr-fr/blog/articles/afir-transparence-prix-bornes-de-recharge-publiques
AFIR : transparence des prix des bornes de recharge publiques
pricing 72 32.3× 1003 💰 Pricing
https://chargemap.com/de-de/blog/artikel/15-besten-apps-fur-unvergessliche-fahrten-mit-ihrem-elektroauto
Top 15 der Apps für unvergessliche Fahrten mit dem E-Auto!
pricing 72 25.8× 1284 💰 Pricing
https://chargemap.com/de-de/blog/artikel/5-moglichkeiten-zu-chargemap-beizutragen
Auf Chargemap beitragen: 5 Möglichkeiten zu helfen
pricing 72 23.2× 1476 💰 Pricing
https://chargemap.com/en-gb/blog/articles/10-arguments-against-evs
10 arguments against EVs: how to respond?
pricing 72 26.9× 1219 💰 Pricing
https://chargemap.com/de-de/blog/artikel/9-fallen-die-sie-beim-aufladen-einer-oeffentlichen-ladestation-vermeiden-sollten
E-Auto richtig laden: 9 Fallen Sie vermeiden sollten
pricing 72 32.6× 1026 💰 Pricing
https://chargemap.com/de-de/blog/artikel/3-chargemap-funktionen-die-unsere-nutzer-lieben
Top 3 der meistgenutzten Chargemap-Funktionen
pricing 72 35.1× 937 💰 Pricing
https://chargemap.com/fr-fr/blog/articles/top-15-applis-pour-vivre-vos-meilleurs-trajets-en-ve
Notre top 15 des applis pour des trajets mémorables en VE !
pricing 72 23.3× 1424 💰 Pricing
https://chargemap.com/en-gb/blog/articles/2026-ranking-best-charging-networks-in-europe
2026 ranking of the best charging networks
pricing 72 27.9× 1211 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://chargemap.com/fr-fr/blog/articles/5-manieres-de-contribuer-sur-chargemap
Contribuer sur Chargemap : 5 manières d'aider la communauté
pricing 72 21.7× 1593 💰 Pricing
https://chargemap.com/en-gb/blog/articles/5-ways-of-making-your-contribution-to-chargemap
Contribute to Chargemap: 5 ways you can help the community
pricing 72 22.1× 1526 💰 Pricing
https://chargemap.com/fr-fr/blog/articles/9-pieges-a-eviter-lorsque-rechargez-borne-publique
Recharger une voiture électrique sur une borne : étapes & conseils
pricing 72 30.9× 1129 💰 Pricing
https://chargemap.com/de-de/blog/artikel/10-argumente-gegen-elektroautos
10 Argumente gegen das Elektroauto
pricing 72 28.2× 1177 💰 Pricing
https://chargemap.com/en-gb/blog/articles/top-15-apps-to-make-the-most-of-your-ev-journeys
Our top 15 apps for memorable electric car journeys
pricing 72 24.7× 1330 💰 Pricing
https://chargemap.com/de-de/blog/artikel/rangliste-2023-besten-ladenetze-europa
Rangliste 2023: Die besten Ladenetze in Europa
pricing 69 60.9× 533 💰 Pricing
Showing 20 of 56 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/fr-fr/ 19 68 0% 38.0× High JS Bloat
/en-gb/ 18 67 0% 42.3× High JS Bloat
/de-de/ 17 66 0% 47.4× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 64 0% 46.4× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 54 0% 75.2× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 56 pages
youtube.com ×56
facebook.com ×56
play.google.com ×56
chargemap-business.com ×56
twitter.com ×56
brakson.com ×56
instagram.com ×56
linkedin.com ×56
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/chargemap.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to chargemap.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
chargemap.com (this site) 58 81 Custom / Proprietary 37.9× 1
automag.ro 83 85 Custom / Proprietary 1.6× 2 Compare →
ineed.ua 83 86 Custom / Proprietary 1.6× 2 Compare →
tsurumai-hobby.jp 83 86 Custom / Proprietary 2.2× 2 Compare →
antikavion.cz 83 86 Custom / Proprietary 2.4× 2 Compare →
skandeko.de 83 86 Custom / Proprietary 2.3× 3 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite chargemap.com when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to chargemap.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 2% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Chargemap?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Chargemap does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Chargemap work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Chargemap."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for chargemap.com:

Current Score
81
Projected Score
89
Improvement
+8 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history