buff.game 66 C
🛡️ SEO 67 🤖 GEO 75 ⚡ Perf 39 🏗️ Arch 78

buff.game — Global SEODiff Score 66/100

buff.game
📊

With a solid 76/100 ACRI, buff.game is well-positioned for AI search — better than 84% of sites in the Radar. Compared to other infrastructure sites (avg score: 57), buff.game performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The low ghost ratio (0%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. A 6.2× bloat ratio is typical for sites in this tech tier — not wasteful, but streamlining could further boost extractability. The site includes 2 schema blocks, providing adequate structured data for basic entity recognition. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

66
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (39) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than buff.game?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)67 × 0.25 = 16.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)75 × 0.40 = 30.0
⚡ Performance (20% weight)39 × 0.20 = 7.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)78 × 0.15 = 11.7
Weighted sum = 16.8 + 30.0 + 7.8 + 11.7
Global SEODiff Score = 66 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
30
Structure
avg 36
44
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 3%
Rank #31041
+13 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 16%
Score 76/100

buff.game shows stronger AI visibility than traditional SEO ranking. Great AI foundation to build on. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why buff.game ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage2 blocks
Token bloat6.2×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

67/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

56 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

141 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 11
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.buff.game/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Buff – Earn Real Rewards While You Game | Gaming Rewards
  • ✓ og:description — Join Buff’s gamer rewards. Earn Buffs by playing Valorant, Fortnite & over 2,000 other games. Redeem for gift cards, gaming gear, Steam keys.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

75/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
buff.game
56
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 30/100 — Low
Structured Elements 136 elements (85 lists, 39 rows, 12 headers)
Total Words4889
Raw Density2.8%
💡Low structure score (30/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 85 list items, 39 table rows, 12 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks2 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

61
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability61/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (50/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

16%
🗑️ 84%
Useful Content (58.7 KB)Bloat (307.4 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio6.2× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context68% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage36 / 53 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 84.0% · SNR: 0.19 · Signal: 15020 / Noise: 78696 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

A local LLM (mlx-community/gemma-3-4b-it-qat-4bit) analyzed the extracted content of buff.game and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
The Investing Mastery Challenge is a 2-week League of Legends tournament designed to test players’ skills, strategy, and courage, offering
Target Audience
Gamers, League of Legends players, competitive gamers, esports enthusiasts
Pricing Model
Tournament-based; prizes awarded to top 800 players.
🔗 Integration Partners
AlienwareBuffs
🏆 Competitive Moat
Structured challenges (Diversity, Financial Fortitude, Strategic Prowess, Risk Management) and a leaderboard-based system create a competitive environment and incentivize player engagement.
📊 Content Depth
6/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Challenge descriptionsPrize informationRules and guidelines
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of structured challenge format
• Limited SEO optimization for challenge-specific content
Model: mlx-community/gemma-3-4b-it-qat-4bit · Analyzed: 2026-03-01 · Data extracted from the site’s main content via strict JSON prompting.

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time1432 ms
Raw HTML Size366.1 KB
Visible Text Size58.7 KB

Performance & Speed

39/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1432 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1792
DOM nodes
366 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → max-age=0
  • ✓ CDN cache status → HIT
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

78/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.buff.game/sitemaps.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

76
internal links
26
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 56/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for buff.game
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/buff.game" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=buff.game" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 75 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
56
Single-page score
+12
Subpages outperform homepage
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
69
Avg across 75 pages · Range 64–90
Topical Cohesion
29%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
192471
Avg Bloat
30.6×
RAG Fractures [?]
30
⚠️
30 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 30 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.buff.game/buff-games-journey-how-a-b-testing-with-splithub-leveled-up-our-platform/
How A/B Testing with SplitHub Leveled Up Our Platform
pricing 90 9.4× 7302 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://buff.game/pricing
BUFF Game – Rewards for CS2, Valorant, Fortnite & More
pricing 77 16.1× 4663 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.buff.game/blog/
Blog - BUFF
pricing 77 14.1× 4257 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://buff.game/products
BUFF Game – Rewards for CS2, Valorant, Fortnite & More
pricing 77 16.1× 4663 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://buff.game/features
BUFF Game – Rewards for CS2, Valorant, Fortnite & More
pricing 77 16.1× 4663 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://buff.game/blog
Blog - BUFF
pricing 77 14.1× 4257 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://buff.game/docs
BUFF Game – Rewards for CS2, Valorant, Fortnite & More
pricing 77 16.1× 4663 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://buff.game/case-studies
BUFF Game – Rewards for CS2, Valorant, Fortnite & More
pricing 77 16.1× 4663 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://buff.game/integrations
BUFF Game – Rewards for CS2, Valorant, Fortnite & More
pricing 77 16.1× 4663 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.buff.game/steam-workshop-for-dota-2/
The Steam Workshop for Dota 2
pricing 77 13.5× 4785 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.buff.game/de-gamer-days-challenge/faq/
DE | FAQ - Gamer Days Challenge
pricing 75 13.2× 5056 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.buff.game/valorant-clash/faq/
FAQ - The Valorant Clash
pricing 75 12.8× 5252 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.buff.game/badguys2/faq/
General FAQ – Bad Guys 2: Good vs Bad Challenge
pricing 75 12.6× 4973 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.buff.game/twitchglitch/faq/
General FAQ – The Twitch Glitch Fortnite Challenge
pricing 75 12.5× 5026 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.buff.game/frijj/faq/
General FAQ – The Just Feel the URjj Challenge
pricing 75 12.3× 5127 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.buff.game/fr-gamer-days-challenge/faq/
FR | FAQ - Gamer Days Challenge
pricing 75 13.0× 5149 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.buff.game/wendys/faq/
General FAQ – Wendy’s Takis Fuego Challenge
pricing 75 12.3× 5125 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.buff.game/novocaine/faq/
General FAQ – Novocaine No Pain, All Gain Challenge
pricing 75 12.6× 5053 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.buff.game/best-dota-2-heroes-for-beginners/
The Best Dota 2 Heroes for Beginners
pricing 75 11.5× 4042 💰 Pricing
https://www.buff.game/guides/
Guides
pricing 72 13.9× 4342 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
Showing 20 of 75 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/faq/ 6 72 0% 14.3× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 2 77 0% 14.1× High JS Bloat
/buff-games-journey-how-a-b-testing-with-splithub-leveled-up-our-platform/ 1 90 0% 9.4× High JS Bloat
/uk-gamer-days-challenge/ 1 72 0% 13.0× High JS Bloat
/top-5-ways-to-earn-new-counter-strike-2-0-skins-in-2024/ 1 64 0% 49.3× High JS Bloat
/rankup-in-csgo-easy-and-fast/ 1 64 0% 45.6× High JS Bloat
/top-3-best-pc-games-for-2022/ 1 64 0% 53.1× High JS Bloat
/t1-dota-2-re-signs-2022-dpc-season/ 1 64 0% 54.3× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 77 0% 16.1× High JS Bloat
/de-gamer-days-challenge/ 1 75 0% 13.2× High JS Bloat
/novocaine/ 1 75 0% 12.6× High JS Bloat
/csgo-jackpot-sites-list/ 1 64 0% 42.0× High JS Bloat
/is-buff-game-legit-worth-it/ 1 64 0% 47.7× High JS Bloat
/iceiceice/ 1 64 0% 38.3× High JS Bloat
/csgo-kick-someone-private-server/ 1 64 0% 40.2× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 75 pages
youtube.com ×75
facebook.com ×75
l.linklyhq.com ×75
discord.com ×75
download.overwolf.com ×37
portal.buff.game ×33
play.google.com ×31
apps.apple.com ×31
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/buff.game

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to buff.game. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
buff.game (this site) 56 76 WordPress 6.2× 2
arzancell.com 81 90 WordPress 8.1× 2 Compare →
swistakpakuje.pl 81 89 WordPress 7.7× 3 Compare →
princeclassified.com 81 94 WordPress 5.6× 5 Compare →
gastronet24.pl 81 90 WordPress 2.2× 3 Compare →
spur.hpplus.jp 81 87 Custom / Proprietary 5.6× 3 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite buff.game when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to buff.game. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Game?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Game does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Game work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Game."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for buff.game:

Current Score
76
Projected Score
82
Improvement
+6 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history