bitbank.cc 65 C
🛡️ SEO 40 🤖 GEO 71 ⚡ Perf 62 🏗️ Arch 93

bitbank.cc — Global SEODiff Score 65/100

bitbank.cc
📊

At 75/100, the ACRI for bitbank.cc indicates strong fundamentals in AI extractability, surpassing the majority of indexed sites. Compared to other infrastructure sites (avg score: 57), bitbank.cc performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The rendering approach is hybrid, with a moderate ghost ratio of 30% — most content is accessible without JS, though some elements are client-rendered. A tight 4.4× token bloat ratio reflects disciplined markup: minimal noise between the crawler and the content it needs. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

65
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (40) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Fix title tag length → +3 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 25, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than bitbank.cc?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)40 × 0.25 = 10.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)71 × 0.40 = 28.4
⚡ Performance (20% weight)62 × 0.20 = 12.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)93 × 0.15 = 13.9
Weighted sum = 10.0 + 28.4 + 12.4 + 13.9
Global SEODiff Score = 65 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
84
Rendering
avg 93
100
Structure
avg 35
2
Schema
avg 10
40
Tech Stack
avg 64
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 10%
Rank #101690
+9 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 19%
Score 75/100

bitbank.cc shows stronger AI visibility than traditional SEO ranking. Great AI foundation to build on. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why bitbank.cc ranks here

Tech stackAngular
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat4.4×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

40/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

101 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

321 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 3
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 14
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://bitbank.cc/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✓ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — ビットバンク(bitbank) | ビットコインが購入できる暗号資産(仮想通貨)取引所
  • ✓ og:description — ビットバンク(bitbank)は、ビットコイン(BTC)・XRP(リップル)・イーサリアム(ETH)など人気の暗号資産(仮想通貨)を売買できる取引所です。豊富な銘柄数と安心のセキュリティで、500円と少額から暗号資産を購入することができます。
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

71/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
bitbank.cc
63
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

👻
Shadow Content Detected: 30% of your page token budget is trapped in non-rendered regions (JavaScript-dependent content invisible to AI crawlers). This dramatically increases hallucination probability — models fill the gap with made-up facts.
Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 30%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 100/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 113 elements (113 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words266
Raw Density42.5%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

1/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

72
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability72/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

22%
🗑️ 78%
Useful Content (13.2 KB)Bloat (45.5 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio4.4× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage37 / 37 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

15 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 77.5% · SNR: 0.29 · Signal: 3380 / Noise: 11637 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkAngular
AI-Readiness Score40/100
ServerAmazonS3
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1005 ms
Raw HTML Size58.7 KB
Visible Text Size13.2 KB

Performance & Speed

62/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1005 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

617
DOM nodes
59 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

93/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://bitbank.cc/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

108
internal links
7
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 63/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for bitbank.cc
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/bitbank.cc" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=bitbank.cc" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 1 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
63
Single-page score
-27
Severe hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
36
Avg across 1 pages · Range 36–36
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 63, but internal pages average only 36 — a -27-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Total Words
136
Avg Bloat
311.8×
RAG Fractures
1
Ext. Citations
9
⚠️
1 RAG-Chunking Fracture Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 1 page will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://bitbank.cc/blog
お知らせ一覧
pricing 36 311.8× 136 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
🔗
Outbound External Citations
9 unique external domains cited across 1 pages
support.bitbank.cc ×1
instagram.com ×1
github.com ×1
bitbank.onelink.me ×1
twitter.com ×1
tech.bitbank.cc ×1
facebook.com ×1
app.bitbank.cc ×1
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/bitbank.cc

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to bitbank.cc. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
bitbank.cc (this site) 63 75 Angular 4.4× 1
bristolstreet.co.uk 63 74 Angular 4.8× 1 Compare →
vertumotors.com 62 74 Angular 4.8× 1 Compare →
oklahomanaturalgas.com 61 73 Angular 4.3× 1 Compare →
kansasgasservice.com 60 73 Angular 4.4× 1 Compare →
texasgasservice.com 60 73 Angular 4.3× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to bitbank.cc. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Bitbank",
  "url": "https://bitbank.cc",
  "logo": "https://assets.bitbank.cc/icons/favicon.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Bitbank?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Bitbank does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Bitbank work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Bitbank."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for bitbank.cc:

Current Score
75
Projected Score
87
Improvement
+12 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history