birdseyepost.com 53 D
🛡️ SEO 47 🤖 GEO 54 ⚡ Perf 36 🏗️ Arch 81

birdseyepost.com — Global SEODiff Score 53/100

birdseyepost.com
📊

With a solid 73/100 ACRI, birdseyepost.com is well-positioned for AI search — better than 76% of sites in the Radar. Compared to other infrastructure sites (avg score: 57), birdseyepost.com performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. Heavy markup overhead (50.0× bloat) forces AI systems to wade through excess code before finding useful information. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

53
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Performance (36) needs urgent attention.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (69×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than birdseyepost.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)47 × 0.25 = 11.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)54 × 0.40 = 21.6
⚡ Performance (20% weight)36 × 0.20 = 7.2
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)81 × 0.15 = 12.2
Weighted sum = 11.8 + 21.6 + 7.2 + 12.2
Global SEODiff Score = 53 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
97
Rendering
avg 93
28
Structure
avg 35
42
Schema
avg 10
70
Tech Stack
avg 64
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 26%
Rank #264181
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 24%
Score 73/100

birdseyepost.com has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why birdseyepost.com ranks here

Tech stackHubSpot CMS
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat50×+

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

47/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

43 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

204 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 16
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 44
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://birdseyepost.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-CA
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — BirdseyePost | Direct Mail, Direct Results!
  • ✓ og:description — BirdseyePost makes personalized direct mail simple. Create targeted postcards, reach the right audience, and track your results—all in one platform. Perfect for businesses aiming to connect and convert.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

54/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
birdseyepost.com
44
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 10%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 28/100 — Low
Structured Elements 95 elements (95 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words4057
Raw Density2.3%
💡Low structure score (28/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 95 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

1/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

45
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability45/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (85/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

1%
🗑️ 99%
Useful Content (25.5 KB)Bloat (1739.9 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio50×+ — Bloated

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context25% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage57 / 225 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 1765.4 KB, but only 25.5 KB is text. 1% useful / 99% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (50×+) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.
💡Only 25% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 98.6% · SNR: 0.01 · Signal: 6534 / Noise: 445403 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkHubSpot CMS
AI-Readiness Score70/100
ServerFramer/bcc70cf
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time567 ms
Raw HTML Size1765.4 KB
Visible Text Size25.5 KB

Performance & Speed

36/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

567 ms
Acceptable — room for improvement

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

6517
DOM nodes
1765 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → public, max-age=0, must-revalidate
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

4
tracker scripts
2
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Moderate trackers — consider lazy-loading non-essential scripts
googletagmanager.comjs.hs-scripts.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

81/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://birdseyepost.com/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

150
internal links
31
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-CA
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 44/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for birdseyepost.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/birdseyepost.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=birdseyepost.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 6 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
44
Single-page score
+1
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
46
Avg across 6 pages · Range 34–64
Topical Cohesion
3%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
8343
Avg Bloat
24785.6×
RAG Fractures
6
Ext. Citations
11
⚠️
6 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 6 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://birdseyepost.com/blog
BirdseyePost | The Mailroom Blog
pricing 64 60.7× 7527 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://birdseyepost.com/case-studies
BirdseyePost | The Mailroom Blog
pricing 54 242.1× 485 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://birdseyepost.com/contact
BirdseyePost | Contact us
pricing 54 366.8× 321 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://birdseyepost.com/pricing
BirdseyePost | Pricing
pricing 34 45089.7× 3 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://birdseyepost.com/about
BirdseyePost | About Us
pricing 34 35473.6× 4 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://birdseyepost.com/features
BirdseyePost | Features
pricing 34 67480.5× 3 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
🔗
Outbound External Citations
11 unique external domains cited across 6 pages
yolando.com ×6
app.dover.io ×6
status.birdseyeglobal.com ×6
app.birdseyepost.com ×6
open.spotify.com ×6
linkedin.com ×6
youtube.com ×6
birdseyeglobal.com ×5
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/birdseyepost.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to birdseyepost.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
birdseyepost.com (this site) 44 73 HubSpot CMS 69.2× 1
hospitable.com 45 73 HubSpot CMS 66.6× 1 Compare →
blink.it 43 69 HubSpot CMS 68.2× 0 Compare →
worldfavor.com 48 75 HubSpot CMS 68.0× 1 Compare →
healthygamer.gg 41 72 HubSpot CMS 66.6× 1 Compare →
viewst.com 41 68 HubSpot CMS 70.9× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to birdseyepost.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Birdseyepost",
  "url": "https://birdseyepost.com",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://birdseyepost.com/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 1% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Birdseyepost?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Birdseyepost does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Birdseyepost work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Birdseyepost."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for birdseyepost.com:

Current Score
73
Projected Score
85
Improvement
+12 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history