basketkorea.com 66 C
🛡️ SEO 57 🤖 GEO 80 ⚡ Perf 55 🏗️ Arch 56

basketkorea.com — Global SEODiff Score 66/100

basketkorea.com
📊

At 62/100, basketkorea.com falls in the moderate bracket of AI-Readiness, suggesting its content is partially accessible to AI systems but not fully optimized. In the infrastructure sector, basketkorea.com outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Content is delivered server-side, meaning bots and AI agents can parse the full page without executing JavaScript. Token bloat registers at 5.9× — acceptable, but reducing inline scripts and redundant markup could yield measurable gains. The presence of 4 structured data blocks ensures search engines and AI agents can accurately classify and extract entities from the page. Most AI crawlers are blocked by robots.txt, severely restricting how AI-powered search engines can index and surface this content.

66
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (55) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 25, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than basketkorea.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)57 × 0.25 = 14.2
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)80 × 0.40 = 32.0
⚡ Performance (20% weight)55 × 0.20 = 11.0
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)56 × 0.15 = 8.4
Weighted sum = 14.2 + 32.0 + 11.0 + 8.4
Global SEODiff Score = 66 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
40
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
64
Structure
avg 35
48
Schema
avg 10
50
Tech Stack
avg 64
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 50%+
Rank #868158
-39 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 47%
Score 62/100

basketkorea.com ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 50%+) than in AI search (Top 47%). This is the 'Invisible Giant' pattern — implement the patches above to close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why basketkorea.com ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage4 blocks
Token bloat5.9×

Fastest improvements

  • Allow GPTBot in robots.txt so AI crawlers can access your pages (see Crawl Access).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

57/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

18 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

97 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✗ Has <h2> headings — found 0
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://basketkorea.com
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✗ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ko
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — 바스켓코리아
  • ✓ og:description — 농구전문매거진, KBL,WKBL, NBA, 대학, 아마, 동아리, 칼럼, 포토 등 기사 제공
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

80/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
basketkorea.com
56
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Blocked
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Blocked
Google-Extended
Blocked
Googlebot
Allowed
💡GPTBot is blocked. To appear in ChatGPT citations, add Allow: / under User-agent: GPTBot in your robots.txt.

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 64/100 — Good
Structured Elements 62 elements (62 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words511
Raw Density12.1%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks4 blocks

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

73
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
High
Blocklist Risk
Extractability73/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (10/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskHigh — 3 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

16%
🗑️ 84%
Useful Content (6.5 KB)Bloat (31.7 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio5.9× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context20% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage9 / 45 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Only 20% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 83.0% · SNR: 0.20 · Signal: 1662 / Noise: 8124 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
ServerApache/2.4.6 (CentOS) OpenSSL/1.0.2k-fips
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time2725 ms
Raw HTML Size38.2 KB
Visible Text Size6.5 KB

Performance & Speed

55/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

2725 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

624
DOM nodes
38 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

3
tracker scripts
2
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googlesyndication.comgoogletagmanager.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

56/100 15 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✗ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

114
internal links
10
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ko
  • ✗ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 56/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for basketkorea.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/basketkorea.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=basketkorea.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to basketkorea.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
basketkorea.com (this site) 56 62 Custom / Proprietary 5.9× 4
haulerhero.com 56 71 Custom / Proprietary 6.0× 4 Compare →
tafsirhulm.com 56 70 Custom / Proprietary 6.4× 4 Compare →
omegleweb.com 56 76 Custom / Proprietary 5.3× 4 Compare →
suhstroi.com 55 71 Custom / Proprietary 6.2× 4 Compare →
phatnguoi.com 58 77 Custom / Proprietary 5.9× 4 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to basketkorea.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Basketkorea",
  "url": "https://basketkorea.com",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://basketkorea.com/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Allow GPTBot in robots.txt
High Impact ⏱ 2 min
GPTBot is blocked — your content cannot appear in ChatGPT citations. Add this to your robots.txt:
text
User-agent: GPTBot
Allow: /

User-agent: ChatGPT-User
Allow: /
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Basketkorea?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Basketkorea does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Basketkorea work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Basketkorea."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for basketkorea.com:

Current Score
62
Projected Score
80
Improvement
+18 pts
Allow GPTBot +8 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history