autotask.com 68 C
🛡️ SEO 68 🤖 GEO 73 ⚡ Perf 47 🏗️ Arch 84

autotask.com — Global SEODiff Score 68/100

autotask.com
📊

With a solid 76/100 ACRI, autotask.com is well-positioned for AI search — better than 83% of sites in the Radar. Compared to other infrastructure sites (avg score: 58), autotask.com performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. The 11.0× token bloat ratio falls within the normal range, though there is room to trim navigation, footer, and script overhead. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

68
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (47) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 23 snapshots
Feb 22 Feb 26
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than autotask.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)68 × 0.25 = 17.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)73 × 0.40 = 29.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)47 × 0.20 = 9.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)84 × 0.15 = 12.6
Weighted sum = 17.0 + 29.2 + 9.4 + 12.6
Global SEODiff Score = 68 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
32
Structure
avg 36
42
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.7%
Rank #7106
+17 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 17%
Score 76/100

autotask.com punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why autotask.com ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat11.0×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

68/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

34 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

162 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 2
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 10
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.datto.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✓ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Datto | IT Solutions Built for You
  • ✓ og:description — IT professionals rely on Datto for mission-critical business continuity and disaster recovery, networking, business management, and file backup and sync solutions
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

73/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
autotask.com
58
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 32/100 — Low
Structured Elements 76 elements (76 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words2403
Raw Density3.2%
💡Low structure score (32/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 76 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

3/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

54
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability54/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

9%
🗑️ 91%
Useful Content (16.6 KB)Bloat (166.4 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio11.0× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context88% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage46 / 52 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 90.9% · SNR: 0.10 · Signal: 4259 / Noise: 42598 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time1119 ms
Raw HTML Size183.0 KB
Visible Text Size16.6 KB

Performance & Speed

47/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1119 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1285
DOM nodes
183 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → max-age=600, must-revalidate
  • ✓ CDN cache status → DYNAMIC
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

84/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.datto.com/sitemap_index.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

23
internal links
95
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 58/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for autotask.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/autotask.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=autotask.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 7 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
58
Single-page score
+6
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
65
Avg across 7 pages · Range 59–69
Topical Cohesion
6%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
3920
Avg Bloat
74.9×
RAG Fractures [?]
7
Ext. Citations
16
⚠️
7 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 7 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://autotask.com/about
About Datto | The Leading Provider of Technology Delivery by MSPs
about 69 53.1× 857 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://autotask.com/products
Products | Business IT Solutions - BCDR, Networking & Business Management
product 69 55.1× 876 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://autotask.com/blog
MSP Tech Blog | Best Practices and for Managed Service Providers
blog 69 45.0× 704 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://autotask.com/contact
Contact Datto | Speak Support, Sales or Billing
pricing 69 59.6× 559 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://autotask.com/pricing
Pricing for Datto Partners | Datto IT Solutions
pricing 59 136.0× 212 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://autotask.com/case-studies
Case Studies Archive | Datto
pricing 59 74.1× 414 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://autotask.com/integrations
Integrations Archive | Datto
integrations 59 101.7× 298 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/pricing/ 1 59 0% 136.0× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 69 0% 55.1× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 69 0% 53.1× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 69 0% 45.0× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 59 0% 74.1× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 69 0% 59.6× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 1 59 0% 101.7× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
16 unique external domains cited across 7 pages
lp.datto.com ×7
kaseya.com ×7
youtube.com ×7
datto.com ×7
twitter.com ×7
helpdesk.kaseya.com ×7
msp.kaseya.com ×7
portal.dattobackup.com ×7
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/autotask.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to autotask.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
autotask.com (this site) 58 76 WordPress 11.0× 1
pacificbattleship.com 58 76 WordPress 11.0× 1 Compare →
robertdraws.org 58 77 WordPress 11.0× 1 Compare →
parsikco.com 58 77 WordPress 11.0× 1 Compare →
veritonedigitalmediahub.com 58 79 WordPress 11.0× 1 Compare →
maacofranchise.com 58 79 WordPress 11.0× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🎭

Bait & Switch Delta

A 7 PAGES

Compares your homepage rendering quality with inner pages. A high drift score means AI crawlers see a polished homepage but degraded inner content — the "bait & switch" that erodes trust.

59
Homepage ACRI
66
Inner Avg ACRI
-7
ACRI Delta
40%
Homepage Ghost
40%
Inner Avg Ghost
0
Drift Score [?]
Worst Inner Pages
69 40% about https://autotask.com/about
69 40% product https://autotask.com/products
69 40% blog https://autotask.com/blog
🛡️

E-E-A-T Trust Signals

C 50/100

Trust indicators extracted from surface pages. These signals help AI systems verify your site's Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness.

Physical Address
Phone Number
Email Contact
About Page
Contact Page
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Named Leadership
Address: 482 Pepper Street Monroe, CT 06468 United States Albany 33 Tech Valley Drive, 2nd Floor East Gree
🔗

Citation Profile

16 DOMAINS

Outbound citation patterns across surface-crawled pages. Sites that cite diverse, authoritative sources signal higher E-E-A-T to AI systems.

95
Total Links
16
Unique Domains
13.6
Avg/Page
17%
Diversity
downloads.datto.com linkedin.com portal.dattobackup.com youtube.com autotask.net app.backupify.com lp.datto.com datto.com twitter.com facebook.com
🏘️ Outbound Neighborhood Trust Avg Trust: 37.9

AI trust scores for the domains autotask.com links to. Citing high-trust sources lifts your own credibility signal.

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to autotask.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 9% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Autotask?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Autotask does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Autotask work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Autotask."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for autotask.com:

Current Score
76
Projected Score
84
Improvement
+8 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history