australianminingreview.com.au 68 C
🛡️ SEO 75 🤖 GEO 74 ⚡ Perf 34 🏗️ Arch 83

australianminingreview.com.au — Global SEODiff Score 68/100

australianminingreview.com.au
📊

At 73/100, the ACRI for australianminingreview.com.au indicates strong fundamentals in AI extractability, surpassing the majority of indexed sites. In the infrastructure sector, australianminingreview.com.au outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. A 6.0× bloat ratio is typical for sites in this tech tier — not wasteful, but streamlining could further boost extractability. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

68
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (34) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 25, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than australianminingreview.com.au?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)75 × 0.25 = 18.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)74 × 0.40 = 29.6
⚡ Performance (20% weight)34 × 0.20 = 6.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)83 × 0.15 = 12.4
Weighted sum = 18.8 + 29.6 + 6.8 + 12.4
Global SEODiff Score = 68 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
18
Structure
avg 35
42
Schema
avg 10
85
Tech Stack
avg 64
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 50%+
Rank #950831
-71 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 24%
Score 73/100

australianminingreview.com.au ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 50%+) than in AI search (Top 24%). This is the 'Invisible Giant' pattern — implement the patches above to close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why australianminingreview.com.au ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat6.0×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

75/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

42 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

134 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 7
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://australianminingreview.com.au/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — The Australian Mining Review
  • ✓ og:description — We're For The Mining Stories That Matter. Published monthly – in hardcopy and digital –The Australian Mining Review is a feature-based publication covering one of the nation’s most significant economic powerhouses.
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

74/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
australianminingreview.com.au
53
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 18/100 — Poor
Structured Elements 41 elements (41 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words4396
Raw Density0.9%
💡Low structure score (18/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 41 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

3/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

58
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability58/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

16%
🗑️ 84%
Useful Content (29.6 KB)Bloat (148.4 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio6.0× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage20 / 20 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 83.4% · SNR: 0.20 · Signal: 7570 / Noise: 37985 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time3228 ms
Raw HTML Size177.9 KB
Visible Text Size29.6 KB

Performance & Speed

34/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

3228 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

973
DOM nodes
178 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate
  • ✓ CDN cache status → DYNAMIC
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
js.hs-scripts.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

83/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://australianminingreview.com.au/sitemap_index.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

59
internal links
13
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 53/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for australianminingreview.com.au
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/australianminingreview.com.au" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=australianminingreview.com.au" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
53
Single-page score
+21
Subpages outperform homepage
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
74
Avg across 10 pages · Range 44–85
Topical Cohesion
2%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
24793
Avg Bloat
25.0×
Ext. Citations
15
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://australianminingreview.com.au/docs
Mining News | The Australian Mining Review
pricing 85 8.6× 4252 💰 Pricing
https://australianminingreview.com.au/blog
Mining News | The Australian Mining Review
pricing 85 8.6× 4252 💰 Pricing
https://australianminingreview.com.au/faq
Mining News | The Australian Mining Review
pricing 85 8.6× 4252 💰 Pricing
https://australianminingreview.com.au/integrations
Mining News | The Australian Mining Review
pricing 85 8.6× 4252 💰 Pricing
https://australianminingreview.com.au/about
Rethinking Crushing: What Your Feed Is Telling You About Your Operation - The Australian Mining Review
pricing 75 12.2× 2063 💰 Pricing
https://australianminingreview.com.au/products
Sigma Telford Group is dedicated to making the purchasing of local, imported and raw materials simple for your business
pricing 75 14.1× 1707 💰 Pricing
https://australianminingreview.com.au/pricing
Superior quality and pricing keeps local foundry one step ahead - The Australian Mining Review
pricing 72 18.0× 1285 💰 Pricing
https://australianminingreview.com.au/case-studies
New protective case takes smartphones to new heights - The Australian Mining Review
pricing 72 15.6× 1495 💰 Pricing
https://australianminingreview.com.au/features
Features - The Australian Mining Review
pricing 67 22.3× 1127 💰 Pricing
https://australianminingreview.com.au/contact
Contact us - The Australian Mining Review
support 44 133.4× 108
🔗
Outbound External Citations
15 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
maps.app.goo.gl ×10
au.linkedin.com ×10
pinterest.com.au ×10
instagram.com ×10
mininghandbook.com.au ×10
facebook.com ×10
defencehandbook.com.au ×10
tiktok.com ×10
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/australianminingreview.com.au

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to australianminingreview.com.au. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
australianminingreview.com.au (this site) 53 73 WordPress 6.0× 1
justrugby.jp 53 74 WordPress 6.0× 1 Compare →
csa.eu 53 76 WordPress 6.0× 1 Compare →
doa786.com 53 69 WordPress 6.0× 1 Compare →
shilpaotc.com 53 72 WordPress 6.0× 1 Compare →
peerberry.com 53 71 WordPress 6.0× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to australianminingreview.com.au. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Com?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Com does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Com work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Com."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for australianminingreview.com.au:

Current Score
73
Projected Score
79
Improvement
+6 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history