antena2.com 71 B
🛡️ SEO 58 🤖 GEO 79 ⚡ Perf 62 🏗️ Arch 83

antena2.com — Global SEODiff Score 71/100

antena2.com
📊

At 70/100, the ACRI for antena2.com indicates strong fundamentals in AI extractability, surpassing the majority of indexed sites. In the infrastructure sector, antena2.com outperforms the average (58), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The low ghost ratio (0%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. A tight 4.1× token bloat ratio reflects disciplined markup: minimal noise between the crawler and the content it needs. The site includes 2 schema blocks, providing adequate structured data for basic entity recognition. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

71
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (58) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 25, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 2 snapshots
Feb 23 Feb 25
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than antena2.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)58 × 0.25 = 14.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)79 × 0.40 = 31.6
⚡ Performance (20% weight)62 × 0.20 = 12.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)83 × 0.15 = 12.4
Weighted sum = 14.5 + 31.6 + 12.4 + 12.4
Global SEODiff Score = 71 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
29
Structure
avg 36
4
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 38%
Rank #384578
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 33%
Score 70/100

antena2.com has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why antena2.com ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage2 blocks
Token bloat4.1×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

58/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

70 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

156 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 5
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.deportesrcn.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → es
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Deportes RCN | Principales noticias de deportes en Colombia y el mundo
  • ✓ og:description — Noticias y actualidad sobre la Selección Colombia de fútbol, fútbol RCN, ciclismo y otros deportes. Novedades de los deportistas colombianos en el mundo.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

79/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
antena2.com
54
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 29/100 — Low
Structured Elements 26 elements (26 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1006
Raw Density2.6%
💡Low structure score (29/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 26 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks2 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

1/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

55
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability55/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

24%
🗑️ 76%
Useful Content (24.6 KB)Bloat (76.2 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio4.1× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage30 / 30 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

23 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 75.6% · SNR: 0.32 · Signal: 6302 / Noise: 19514 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
ServerKestrel
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1087 ms
Raw HTML Size100.8 KB
Visible Text Size24.6 KB

Performance & Speed

62/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1087 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

594
DOM nodes
101 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
doubleclick.net
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

83/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

84
internal links
46
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → es
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 54/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for antena2.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/antena2.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=antena2.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
54
Single-page score
+2
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
56
Avg across 10 pages · Range 56–56
Total Words
5560
Avg Bloat
37.1×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://antena2.com/pricing
Deportes RCN | Principales noticias de deportes en Colombia y el mundo
pricing 56 37.1× 556 💰 Pricing
https://antena2.com/about
Deportes RCN | Principales noticias de deportes en Colombia y el mundo
pricing 56 37.1× 556 💰 Pricing
https://antena2.com/products
Deportes RCN | Principales noticias de deportes en Colombia y el mundo
pricing 56 37.1× 556 💰 Pricing
https://antena2.com/features
Deportes RCN | Principales noticias de deportes en Colombia y el mundo
pricing 56 37.1× 556 💰 Pricing
https://antena2.com/docs
Deportes RCN | Principales noticias de deportes en Colombia y el mundo
pricing 56 37.1× 556 💰 Pricing
https://antena2.com/blog
Deportes RCN | Principales noticias de deportes en Colombia y el mundo
pricing 56 37.1× 556 💰 Pricing
https://antena2.com/case-studies
Deportes RCN | Principales noticias de deportes en Colombia y el mundo
pricing 56 37.1× 556 💰 Pricing
https://antena2.com/faq
Deportes RCN | Principales noticias de deportes en Colombia y el mundo
pricing 56 37.1× 556 💰 Pricing
https://antena2.com/contact
Deportes RCN | Principales noticias de deportes en Colombia y el mundo
pricing 56 37.1× 556 💰 Pricing
https://antena2.com/integrations
Deportes RCN | Principales noticias de deportes en Colombia y el mundo
pricing 56 37.1× 556 💰 Pricing
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/about/ 1 56 0% 37.1× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 56 0% 37.1× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 1 56 0% 37.1× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 1 56 0% 37.1× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 56 0% 37.1× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 56 0% 37.1× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 56 0% 37.1× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 56 0% 37.1× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 56 0% 37.1× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 56 0% 37.1× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
lafm.com.co ×10
instagram.com ×10
corporativorcnradio.com ×10
noticiasrcn.com ×10
superlike.com ×10
youtube.com ×10
ntn24.com ×10
deportesrcn.com ×10
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/antena2.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to antena2.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
antena2.com (this site) 54 70 WordPress 4.1× 2
sdhc.org 79 88 WordPress 6.8× 1 Compare →
bmm.hu 79 90 WordPress 11.3× 2 Compare →
xn--0ck4aw2h.gamewith.jp 79 79 Custom / Proprietary 4.1× 2 Compare →
cr.epaenlinea.com 79 87 Express 4.6× 2 Compare →
gedshop.it 79 86 Express 3.5× 2 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to antena2.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Antena2",
  "url": "https://antena2.com",
  "logo": "https://i.deportesrcn.com/__assets/favicon/apple-touch-icon.png",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Antena2?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Antena2 does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Antena2 work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Antena2."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for antena2.com:

Current Score
70
Projected Score
82
Improvement
+12 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history