alphonso.tv 57 D
🛡️ SEO 43 🤖 GEO 60 ⚡ Perf 55 🏗️ Arch 76

alphonso.tv — Global SEODiff Score 57/100

alphonso.tv
📊

At 81/100, the ACRI for alphonso.tv indicates strong fundamentals in AI extractability, surpassing the majority of indexed sites. Within the infrastructure vertical, this places alphonso.tv above the industry average of 58 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The low ghost ratio (0%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. Heavy markup overhead (20.0× bloat) forces AI systems to wade through excess code before finding useful information. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

57
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Traditional SEO (43) needs urgent attention.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 28, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 24 snapshots
Feb 22 Feb 28
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than alphonso.tv?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)43 × 0.25 = 10.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)60 × 0.40 = 24.0
⚡ Performance (20% weight)55 × 0.20 = 11.0
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)76 × 0.15 = 11.4
Weighted sum = 10.8 + 24.0 + 11.0 + 11.4
Global SEODiff Score = 57 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
54
Structure
avg 36
42
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.1%
Rank #1052
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 5%
Score 81/100

alphonso.tv has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why alphonso.tv ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat20.0×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

43/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

32 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

0 chars
Missing

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 2
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 1
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://alphonso.tv/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✗ og:title
  • ✗ og:description
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

60/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
alphonso.tv
45
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 54/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 18 elements (18 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words206
Raw Density8.7%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

1/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

57
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability57/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (20/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

5%
🗑️ 95%
Useful Content (2.3 KB)Bloat (43.9 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio20.0× — Heavy

Multimodal Readiness

Visual ContextNo images detected
Image Alt Coverage0 / 0 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 46.3 KB, but only 2.3 KB is text. 5% useful / 95% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (20.0×) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 95.0% · SNR: 0.05 · Signal: 593 / Noise: 11250 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

A local LLM (mlx-community/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-4bit) analyzed the extracted content of alphonso.tv and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Collects and analyzes audio data from TV viewing to provide media recommendations and ad targeting.
Target Audience
Consumers, businesses, developers, publishers, advertisers, device manufacturers
Pricing Model
Not explicitly mentioned
🏆 Competitive Moat
Unique audio recognition technology for TV viewing data.
📊 Content Depth
5/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
location pagesdirectory listingsAPI reference docscomparison pagesglossary/dictionary pagestemplate-generated category pages
⚡ Key Pain Points
• No meta descriptions
• Thin content on category pages
Model: mlx-community/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-4bit · Analyzed: 2026-02-27 · Data extracted from the site’s main content via strict JSON prompting.

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time4347 ms
Raw HTML Size46.3 KB
Visible Text Size2.3 KB

Performance & Speed

55/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

4347 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

212
DOM nodes
46 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → max-age=600, must-revalidate
  • ✓ CDN cache status → DYNAMIC
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

76/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

17
internal links
2
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 45/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for alphonso.tv
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/alphonso.tv" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=alphonso.tv" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 126 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
45
Single-page score
+21
Subpages outperform homepage
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
66
Avg across 126 pages · Range 23–90
Topical Cohesion
4%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
231520
Avg Bloat
72.7×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://alphonso.tv/privacy/this-site/site-privacy-policy-de/
Privacy Policy | LG Ad Solutions
legal 90 3.8× 4105
https://alphonso.tv/privacy/this-site/site-privacy-policy-fr/
Privacy Policy | LG Ad Solutions
legal 90 3.8× 4105
https://alphonso.tv/privacy/this-site/site-privacy-policy-es/
Privacy Policy | LG Ad Solutions
legal 90 3.8× 4105
https://alphonso.tv/privacy/this-site/
Privacy Policy | LG Ad Solutions
legal 90 3.8× 4105
https://alphonso.tv/privacy/this-site/terms-html/
Privacy Policy | LG Ad Solutions
legal 90 3.8× 4105
https://alphonso.tv/privacy/this-site/site-privacy-policy/
Privacy Policy | LG Ad Solutions
legal 90 3.8× 4105
https://alphonso.tv/privacy/smart-tvs/philippines-smart-tvs-privacy-policy/
Philippines Smart TVs Privacy Policy – Alphonso
legal 82 4.2× 2576
https://alphonso.tv/privacy/smart-tvs/peru-smart-tvs-privacy-policy/
Peru Smart TVs Privacy Policy – Alphonso
legal 82 4.5× 2310
https://alphonso.tv/privacy/smart-tvs/vietnam-smart-tvs-privacy-policy/
Vietnam Smart Tvs Privacy Policy – Alphonso
legal 82 3.6× 3127
https://alphonso.tv/privacy/smart-tvs/columbia-smart-tvs-privacy-policy/
Columbia Smart TVs Privacy Policy – Alphonso
legal 82 4.7× 2233
https://alphonso.tv/privacy/smart-tvs/smart-tv-privacy-previous/january-2024/
January 2024 – Alphonso
legal 82 4.0× 2768
https://alphonso.tv/privacy/smart-tvs/smart-tv-privacy-previous/december-2022/
December 2022 – Alphonso
legal 82 4.0× 2763
https://alphonso.tv/privacy/smart-tvs/smart-tv-privacy-previous/june-2021/
June 2021 – Alphonso
legal 82 4.2× 2620
https://alphonso.tv/privacy/smart-tvs/smart-tv-privacy-policy-brazil-pt/
Brazil Smart TV Privacy Policy – Alphonso
legal 82 4.3× 2600
https://alphonso.tv/privacy/smart-tvs/smart-tv-privacy-previous/january-2020/
January 2020 – Alphonso
legal 82 4.2× 2541
https://alphonso.tv/privacy/smart-tvs/smart-tv-privacy-policy-eu-swedish/
Smart TV Privacy Policy – EU – Swedish – Alphonso
legal 82 3.9× 3373
https://alphonso.tv/privacy/smart-tvs/smart-tv-privacy-policy-eu-slovenian/
Smart TV Privacy Policy – EU – Slovenian – Alphonso
legal 82 3.7× 3558
https://alphonso.tv/privacy/smart-tvs/smart-tv-privacy-policy-eu-slovak/
Smart TV Privacy Policy – EU – Slovak – Alphonso
legal 82 4.0× 3484
https://alphonso.tv/privacy/smart-tvs/smart-tv-privacy-policy-eu-romanian/
Smart TV Privacy Policy – EU – Romanian – Alphonso
legal 82 3.4× 4080
https://alphonso.tv/privacy/smart-tvs/smart-tv-privacy-policy-eu-portuguese/
Smart TV Privacy Policy – EU – Portuguese – Alphonso
legal 82 3.5× 3862
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/privacy/ 104 73 0% 25.4× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 2 24 0% 405.3× Bot Blocked
/data-sales-partners/ 1 23 1% 437.2× Bot Blocked
/alphonso-employee-privacy-policy/ 1 67 0% 13.4× High JS Bloat
/link-to-form-no-mgt-7-2/ 1 26 0% 417.9× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 54 0% 56.3× High JS Bloat
/ccpa-results/ 1 36 0% 118.5× High JS Bloat
/annual-returns-for-fy-2020-21/ 1 26 0% 419.7× High JS Bloat
/annual-return-for-fy-2018-19/ 1 26 0% 419.6× High JS Bloat
/annual-returns-for-fy-2019-20/ 1 26 0% 419.7× High JS Bloat
/data-purchase-partners/ 1 26 0% 207.8× High JS Bloat
/annual-returns-for-fy-2021-22/ 1 26 0% 419.7× High JS Bloat
/for-app-developers/ 1 49 0% 21.1× High JS Bloat
/annual-returns-for-fy-2024-25/ 1 26 0% 418.4× High JS Bloat
/annual-returns-for-fy-2022-23/ 1 26 0% 418.5× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 126 pages
choice.alphonso.tv ×126
linkedin.com ×126
youradchoices.com ×56
aboutads.info ×31
edpb.europa.eu ×24
jamsadr.com ×24
dataprivacyframework.gov ×24
lgads.tv ×9
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/alphonso.tv

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to alphonso.tv. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
alphonso.tv (this site) 45 81 WordPress 20.0× 1
thecmp.org 70 86 WordPress 10.5× 1 Compare →
blog.hootsuite.com 70 85 WordPress 9.8× 1 Compare →
material-properties.org 70 81 WordPress 9.7× 1 Compare →
radiopopular.pt 70 86 WordPress 9.1× 1 Compare →
mvariety.com 70 85 WordPress 9.5× 2 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
👻

Rendering Drop-Off by Depth

DEPTH PENALTY 126 PAGES
0%
Homepage Ghost
10%
Deep Pages Avg Ghost
4%
Homepage Bloat
73%
Deep Pages Avg Bloat
Ghost Ratio by Crawl Depth
Depth 0
0%
1 pg · ACRI 90
Orphan
10%
125 pg · ACRI 66
⚠️ Worst Rendering Pages
40% https://alphonso.tv/404-2/ orphan
60% https://alphonso.tv/blog orphan
60% https://alphonso.tv/data-sales-partners/ orphan
40% https://alphonso.tv/privacy/smart-tvs/smart-tv-tos/previous-tos/ orphan
40% https://alphonso.tv/annual-returns-for-fy-2020-21/ orphan
Deeper pages lose rendering fidelity. Pages at depth 4+ often show 2-3× higher ghost ratios than the homepage, meaning AI crawlers see progressively less of your actual content as they navigate deeper into the site architecture.
🏗️

Deep Architecture Health & Equity Distribution

126 PAGES
84.3%
Gini Inequality [?]
Extreme hoarding
85%
Top-3 PR Share [?]
Equity held by 3 pages
125
Orphan Pages [?]
99.2% of site
0.0
Avg Click Depth [?]
Max: 0 clicks
0
Internal Links
125 disconnected
49%
Semantic Cohesion [?]
Moderate Drift
1% Healthy (receive equity)
0% Diluted hubs (>50 outbound)
99% Orphans (zero inbound)
🔗 Top Hub Pages (Highest PageRank)
https://alphonso.tv/privacy/this-site/site-privacy-policy-de/ https://alphonso.tv/privacy/this-site/site-privacy-policy-fr/ https://alphonso.tv/privacy/this-site/site-privacy-policy-es/ https://alphonso.tv/privacy/this-site/ https://alphonso.tv/privacy/this-site/terms-html/
⚠️
125 orphan pages receive zero internal link equity. A Gini coefficient of 0.84 means the top 3 pages hoard 85% of all internal PageRank — AI crawlers may never discover the rest.
💡 Quick Win: Optimal Link Injection
To rescue the orphan page site privacy policy fr, add a link to it from your high-authority Hub Page site privacy policy de. (Semantic Match: 99%)
📥 Orphan: https://alphonso.tv/privacy/this-site/site-privacy-policy-fr/
🔗 Donor: https://alphonso.tv/privacy/this-site/site-privacy-policy-de/ (PR: 0.8512)
Get the full link injection plan for all 125 orphan pages
Unlock Full Link Strategy →
The Gini coefficient measures link equity inequality across your site. A Gini of 0.84 indicates severe equity hoarding — a handful of pages dominate PageRank while hundreds starve. AI crawlers penalize this by ignoring deep pages.
🗂️

Topical Authority Distribution

9 TOPICS

How this domain's content is distributed across topic areas — derived from TF-IDF analysis of 126 crawled pages.

annual, returns, for
26 5 pgs (20%)
utilize, collection, date
86 5 pgs (20%)
fecha, televisores, que
77 3 pgs (12%)
stop, advanced, our
54 2 pgs (8%)
english, policy, through
82 2 pgs (8%)
here, please, compliance
33 2 pgs (8%)
croation, english, finnish
77 2 pgs (8%)
privacy, english, pipeda
52 2 pgs (8%)
german, portuguese, swedish
52 2 pgs (8%)
Topical Authority shows how your content is concentrated. High concentration in few topics may limit long-tail search coverage; extreme fragmentation dilutes your authority signal.
🧲

Semantic Density

STRONG 60 TOPICS
60
Topic Clusters
via TF-IDF cosine, ε=.60
50
High-Density Pairs
>92% cosine similarity
Strong
Contextual Depth
>20 pairs
Reinforcing Content Clusters
🟢 stop, advanced, our 100% avg similarity · ACRI 54–54
  • https://alphonso.tv/privacy/terms-of-service-de/
  • https://alphonso.tv/privacy/terms-of-service-fr/
🟢 annual, returns, for 100% avg similarity · ACRI 26–26
  • https://alphonso.tv/annual-returns-for-fy-2024-25/
  • https://alphonso.tv/annual-returns-for-fy-2023-24/
  • https://alphonso.tv/annual-returns-for-fy-2020-21/
  • https://alphonso.tv/annual-returns-for-fy-2019-20/
  • https://alphonso.tv/annual-return-for-fy-2018-19/
🟢 utilize, collection, date 99% avg similarity · ACRI 82–90
  • https://alphonso.tv/privacy/this-site/site-privacy-policy-de/
  • https://alphonso.tv/privacy/this-site/site-privacy-policy-fr/
  • https://alphonso.tv/privacy/this-site/site-privacy-policy-es/
  • https://alphonso.tv/privacy/this-site/
  • https://alphonso.tv/privacy/this-site/terms-html/
🟢 english, policy, through 99% avg similarity · ACRI 82–82
  • https://alphonso.tv/privacy/smart-tvs/smart-tv-privacy-previous/january-2024/
  • https://alphonso.tv/privacy/smart-tvs/smart-tv-privacy-previous/january-2020/
🟢 here, please, compliance 94% avg similarity · ACRI 33–33
  • https://alphonso.tv/privacy/
  • https://alphonso.tv/temporary/
🟢 fecha, televisores, que 93% avg similarity · ACRI 77–77
  • https://alphonso.tv/privacy/smart-tvs/smart-tv-privacy-policy-mexico/
  • https://alphonso.tv/privacy/smart-tvs/smart-tv-privacy-policy-chile/
  • https://alphonso.tv/privacy/smart-tvs/smart-tv-privacy-policy-argentina/
🟢 croation, english, finnish 93% avg similarity · ACRI 77–77
  • https://alphonso.tv/privacy/smart-tvs/smart-tv-tos-greek/
  • https://alphonso.tv/privacy/smart-tvs/smart-tv-tos-bulgarian/
🟢 privacy, english, pipeda 92% avg similarity · ACRI 52–52
  • https://alphonso.tv/privacy/smart-tvs/privacy-policy-canada-traditional-chinese/
  • https://alphonso.tv/privacy/smart-tvs/privacy-policy-canada-simplified-chinese/
🟢 german, portuguese, swedish 92% avg similarity · ACRI 52–52
  • https://alphonso.tv/privacy/smart-tvs/smart-tv-tos-ch-traditional/
  • https://alphonso.tv/privacy/smart-tvs/smart-tv-tos-ch-simplified/
Semantic Density measures how deeply your site covers each topic. High-density clusters (>92% similarity) mean multiple pages reinforce the same subject — this is positive for RAG/AI systems that need corroborating sources. Thin coverage (few clusters) means AI models have less evidence to cite you.
Get a full content consolidation plan for all 50 high-density pairs
Unlock Consolidation Plan →
🧬

Entity Knowledge Gap Analysis

5 MISSING 10% COVERAGE
⚠️ 5 entities mentioned in content but missing from structured data:
Go SAML Deno SSO REST
Each missing entity is a lost opportunity for rich snippet inclusion and AI knowledge graph integration.
Schema Coverage: 1 declared vs 10 extracted — 10% coverage Entities with <100% coverage create knowledge graph blind spots for AI systems
🧭

Semantic Nearest Neighbors

View all →
alexbank.com
banking services for individuals
49%
Overlap
75
ACRI
Compare
abtasty.com
SEMANTIC VOID
42%
Overlap
71
ACRI
Compare
40%
Overlap
47
ACRI
Compare
39%
Overlap
34
ACRI
Compare
35%
Overlap
77
ACRI
Compare
View All Semantic Alternatives → 📚 Docs Quality Index →
🎭

Bait & Switch Delta

F 15 PAGES

Compares your homepage rendering quality with inner pages. A high drift score means AI crawlers see a polished homepage but degraded inner content — the "bait & switch" that erodes trust.

54
Homepage ACRI
26
Inner Avg ACRI
+28
ACRI Delta
40%
Homepage Ghost
43%
Inner Avg Ghost
80
Drift Score [?]
Worst Inner Pages
23 60% integrations https://alphonso.tv/data-sales-partners/
23 60% blog https://alphonso.tv/blog
26 40% integrations https://alphonso.tv/data-partners/
🛡️

E-E-A-T Trust Signals

F 0/100

Trust indicators extracted from surface pages. These signals help AI systems verify your site's Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness.

Physical Address
Phone Number
Email Contact
About Page
Contact Page
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Named Leadership
🔗

Citation Profile

3 DOMAINS

Outbound citation patterns across surface-crawled pages. Sites that cite diverse, authoritative sources signal higher E-E-A-T to AI systems.

31
Total Links
3
Unique Domains
2.1
Avg/Page
10%
Diversity
linkedin.com choice.alphonso.tv lgads.tv
🏘️ Outbound Neighborhood Trust Avg Trust: 30.4

AI trust scores for the domains alphonso.tv links to. Citing high-trust sources lifts your own credibility signal.

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to alphonso.tv. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Alphonso",
  "url": "https://alphonso.tv",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://alphonso.tv/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 5% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Alphonso?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Alphonso does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Alphonso work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Alphonso."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for alphonso.tv:

Current Score
81
Projected Score
93
Improvement
+12 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history