alinoma.jp 59 D
🛡️ SEO 40 🤖 GEO 88 ⚡ Perf 11 🏗️ Arch 78

alinoma.jp — Global SEODiff Score 59/100

alinoma.jp
📊

With a solid 82/100 ACRI, alinoma.jp is well-positioned for AI search — better than 96% of sites in the Radar. Compared to other infrastructure sites (avg score: 58), alinoma.jp performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. A tight 4.9× token bloat ratio reflects disciplined markup: minimal noise between the crawler and the content it needs. Minimal structured data (1 block) limits the site's ability to communicate entity relationships to AI systems. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

59
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Performance (11) needs urgent attention.
🎯 Top Fix: Fix title tag length → +3 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 3 snapshots
Feb 23 Feb 26
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than alinoma.jp?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)40 × 0.25 = 10.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)88 × 0.40 = 35.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)11 × 0.20 = 2.2
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)78 × 0.15 = 11.7
Weighted sum = 10.0 + 35.2 + 2.2 + 11.7
Global SEODiff Score = 59 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
100
Structure
avg 36
2
Schema
avg 9
70
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 19%
Rank #192651
-15 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 4%
Score 82/100

alinoma.jp is more visible to Google than to AI models. There's room to improve AI discoverability to match your search reputation. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why alinoma.jp ranks here

Tech stackNext.js
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat4.9×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

40/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

78 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

354 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 2
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 12
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://alinoma.jp
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — 【アリノマ】大きいサイズのレディースファッション通販
  • ✓ og:description — 大きいサイズ レディースファッションモール,通販 Alinoma(アリノマ/ありのま)では、人気ブランドの様々なファッションアイテムからあなたにぴったりのサイズLサイズから10Lサイズまでお探しできます。ぽっちゃり,大きいサイズ,可愛い,5,500円(税込)以上で送料無料
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

88/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
alinoma.jp
77
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 100/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 1200 elements (1200 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words2448
Raw Density49.0%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

1/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

75
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability75/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (70/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

20%
🗑️ 80%
Useful Content (122.2 KB)Bloat (474.5 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio4.9× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context90% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage308 / 341 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

2 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 79.5% · SNR: 0.26 · Signal: 31282 / Noise: 121470 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

A local LLM (mlx-community/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-4bit) analyzed the extracted content of alinoma.jp and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
プラッサイズのレディースファッション通販
Target Audience
20代~40代の女性
Pricing Model
オープンキャンペーン、3,000円以上購入でクーポン使用可
Model: mlx-community/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-4bit · Analyzed: 2026-02-26 · Data extracted from the site’s main content via strict JSON prompting.

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkNext.js
AI-Readiness Score70/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time2459 ms
Raw HTML Size596.7 KB
Visible Text Size122.2 KB

Performance & Speed

11/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

2459 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

5585
DOM nodes
597 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → max-age=0, no-cache, no-store
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

78/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

497
internal links
18
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 77/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for alinoma.jp
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/alinoma.jp" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=alinoma.jp" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 934 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
77
Single-page score
-13
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
64
Avg across 934 pages · Range 64–70
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 77, but internal pages average only 64 — a -13-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Total Words
1248457
Avg Bloat
75.8×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://alinoma.jp/guide
ご利用ガイド|【アリノマ】大きいサイズのレディースファッション通販
pricing 70 56.2× 1878 💰 Pricing
https://alinoma.jp/terms
利用規約|【アリノマ】大きいサイズのレディースファッション通販
pricing 70 61.9× 1530 💰 Pricing
https://alinoma.jp/guide/point
ポイント・クーポン|【アリノマ】大きいサイズのレディースファッション通販
pricing 67 75.6× 1146 💰 Pricing
https://alinoma.jp/faq
よくあるご質問|【アリノマ】大きいサイズのレディースファッション通販
pricing 67 72.5× 1192 💰 Pricing
https://alinoma.jp/contact
お問い合わせ|【アリノマ】大きいサイズのレディースファッション通販
pricing 67 74.4× 1158 💰 Pricing
https://alinoma.jp/feltmaglietta
【アリノマ】大きいサイズのレディースファッション通販
pricing 67 67.9× 1799 💰 Pricing
https://alinoma.jp/edwin
【アリノマ】大きいサイズのレディースファッション通販
pricing 67 67.9× 1799 💰 Pricing
https://alinoma.jp/foel
【アリノマ】大きいサイズのレディースファッション通販
pricing 67 67.9× 1799 💰 Pricing
https://alinoma.jp/kazen
【アリノマ】大きいサイズのレディースファッション通販
pricing 67 67.9× 1799 💰 Pricing
https://alinoma.jp/neina
ネイナ|【アリノマ】大きいサイズのレディースファッション通販
pricing 67 72.2× 1345 💰 Pricing
https://alinoma.jp/item/detail/1_181_181202402019439/101
小花柄刺しゅうブラジャーショーツ5セット組 CFC0320D0003|【アリノマ】大きいサイズのレディースファッション通販
pricing 67 63.6× 2233 💰 Pricing
https://alinoma.jp/smilelandinner
スマイルランド(インナー・下着)|【アリノマ】大きいサイズのレディースファッション通販
pricing 67 72.1× 1382 💰 Pricing
https://alinoma.jp/smilelandshosebag
スマイルランド(クツ・バッグ)|【アリノマ】大きいサイズのレディースファッション通販
pricing 67 74.3× 1294 💰 Pricing
https://alinoma.jp/superhakkafeuille
【アリノマ】大きいサイズのレディースファッション通販
pricing 67 67.9× 1799 💰 Pricing
https://alinoma.jp/brandlist
ブランド一覧|【アリノマ】大きいサイズのレディースファッション通販
pricing 67 58.5× 1693 💰 Pricing
https://alinoma.jp/welcome
初めての方へ|【アリノマ】大きいサイズのレディースファッション通販
pricing 67 73.6× 1217 💰 Pricing
https://alinoma.jp/s/18COLOR
パーソナルカラー診断|【アリノマ】大きいサイズのレディースファッション通販
pricing 67 71.6× 1328 💰 Pricing
https://alinoma.jp/item/detail/1_181_181202402019444/104
【大きいサイズ】3秒ルームワンピース2枚組 (裏シャギー・長袖プチハイネック) VCZ0121E0011|【アリノマ】大きいサイズのレディースファッション通販
pricing 67 72.9× 1659 💰 Pricing
https://alinoma.jp/item/detail/1_156_156202402020029/102
新色追加!! 「極み」 ストレッチ ワイド デニム 3丈から選べる 448113|【アリノマ】大きいサイズのレディースファッション通販
pricing 67 70.8× 1687 💰 Pricing
https://alinoma.jp/item/detail/1_156_156202402020028/104
圧倒的美脚・美尻&極上の穿き心地を叶える 優勝ストレートパンツ <スッキリシルエットver> 448112|【アリノマ】大きいサイズのレディースファッション通販
pricing 67 61.6× 2086 💰 Pricing
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/item/ 477 64 0% 75.9× High JS Bloat
/s/ 2 67 0% 72.9× High JS Bloat
/guide/ 2 68 0% 65.9× High JS Bloat
/edwin/ 1 67 0% 67.9× High JS Bloat
/foel/ 1 67 0% 67.9× High JS Bloat
/corporate-inquiries/ 1 67 0% 74.4× High JS Bloat
/cart/ 1 64 0% 77.1× High JS Bloat
/brandlist/ 1 67 0% 58.5× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 67 0% 74.4× High JS Bloat
/legal/ 1 67 0% 72.7× High JS Bloat
/terms/ 1 70 0% 61.9× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 1 67 0% 72.5× High JS Bloat
/privacy/ 1 67 0% 67.8× High JS Bloat
/neina/ 1 67 0% 72.2× High JS Bloat
/cscontact/ 1 67 0% 74.0× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 934 pages
tiktok.com ×934
line.me ×934
info.nissen.co.jp ×934
facebook.com ×934
instagram.com ×934
twitter.com ×934
alinoma.cubki.jp ×934
hb.afl.rakuten.co.jp ×708
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/alinoma.jp

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to alinoma.jp. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
alinoma.jp (this site) 77 82 Next.js 4.9× 1
profitserver.ru 86 90 WordPress 3.8× 2 Compare →
sigmaflows.com 88 93 Express 2.3× 1 Compare →
violinsetc.com 89 86 Custom / Proprietary 2.2× 1 Compare →
pubsandclubs.com.au 86 87 Custom / Proprietary 4.9× 4 Compare →
kondela.hu 86 93 Custom / Proprietary 3.1× 4 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
👻

Rendering Drop-Off by Depth

DEPTH PENALTY 934 PAGES
0%
Homepage Ghost
39%
Deep Pages Avg Ghost
62%
Homepage Bloat
76%
Deep Pages Avg Bloat
Ghost Ratio by Crawl Depth
Depth 0
0%
1 pg · ACRI 70
Orphan
39%
933 pg · ACRI 64
⚠️ Worst Rendering Pages
40% https://alinoma.jp/item/detail/1_136_136202403018804/GRNOR orphan
40% https://alinoma.jp/item/detail/1_110_110202402019048/5700 orphan
40% https://alinoma.jp/item/detail/1_157_N034024S0024/103 orphan
40% https://alinoma.jp/item/detail/1_110_110202402019507/100 orphan
40% https://alinoma.jp/item/detail/1_134_N017921F0139/PIBE orphan
Deeper pages lose rendering fidelity. Pages at depth 4+ often show 2-3× higher ghost ratios than the homepage, meaning AI crawlers see progressively less of your actual content as they navigate deeper into the site architecture.
🏗️

Deep Architecture Health & Equity Distribution

934 PAGES
84.9%
Gini Inequality [?]
Extreme hoarding
85%
Top-3 PR Share [?]
Equity held by 3 pages
933
Orphan Pages [?]
99.9% of site
0.0
Avg Click Depth [?]
Max: 0 clicks
0
Internal Links
933 disconnected
79%
Semantic Cohesion [?]
Strong Alignment
0% Healthy (receive equity)
0% Diluted hubs (>50 outbound)
100% Orphans (zero inbound)
🔗 Top Hub Pages (Highest PageRank)
https://alinoma.jp/terms https://alinoma.jp/guide https://alinoma.jp/privacy https://alinoma.jp/item/detail/1_167_N027321A0026/BL https://alinoma.jp/item/detail/1_181_N000119S0051/103
⚠️
933 orphan pages receive zero internal link equity. A Gini coefficient of 0.85 means the top 3 pages hoard 85% of all internal PageRank — AI crawlers may never discover the rest.
💡 Quick Win: Optimal Link Injection
To rescue the orphan page guide, add a link to it from your high-authority Hub Page terms. (Semantic Match: 100%)
📥 Orphan: https://alinoma.jp/guide
🔗 Donor: https://alinoma.jp/terms (PR: 0.8502)
Get the full link injection plan for all 933 orphan pages
Unlock Full Link Strategy →
The Gini coefficient measures link equity inequality across your site. A Gini of 0.85 indicates severe equity hoarding — a handful of pages dominate PageRank while hundreds starve. AI crawlers penalize this by ignoring deep pages.
🗂️

Topical Authority Distribution

10 TOPICS

How this domain's content is distributed across topic areas — derived from TF-IDF analysis of 934 crawled pages.

anw
65 5 pgs (16%)
women, men
67 5 pgs (16%)
nwjbb, women, men
64 5 pgs (16%)
fila, aah
64 3 pgs (9%)
baw
64 3 pgs (9%)
women, men, nwicb
64 3 pgs (9%)
foha
64 2 pgs (6%)
cast
64 2 pgs (6%)
ssa
64 2 pgs (6%)
vsc
64 2 pgs (6%)
Topical Authority shows how your content is concentrated. High concentration in few topics may limit long-tail search coverage; extreme fragmentation dilutes your authority signal.
🧲

Semantic Density

DEEP 261 TOPICS
261
Topic Clusters
via TF-IDF cosine, ε=.60
53313
High-Density Pairs
>92% cosine similarity
Deep
Contextual Depth
>50 pairs
Reinforcing Content Clusters
🟢 anw 100% avg similarity · ACRI 64–67
  • https://alinoma.jp/item/detail/1_180_180202402017751/101
  • https://alinoma.jp/item/detail/1_180_180202402017752/101
  • https://alinoma.jp/item/detail/1_180_180202402017753/101
  • https://alinoma.jp/item/detail/1_180_180202402017764/101
  • https://alinoma.jp/item/detail/1_180_180202402017754/102
🟢 foha 100% avg similarity · ACRI 64–64
  • https://alinoma.jp/item/detail/1_167_N027321W0063/BK
  • https://alinoma.jp/item/detail/1_167_N027323W0084/bk
🟢 women, men 100% avg similarity · ACRI 64–70
  • https://alinoma.jp/terms
  • https://alinoma.jp/guide
  • https://alinoma.jp/privacy
  • https://alinoma.jp/contact
  • https://alinoma.jp/faq
🟢 fila, aah 100% avg similarity · ACRI 64–64
  • https://alinoma.jp/item/detail/1_180_N031224M0207/101
  • https://alinoma.jp/item/detail/1_180_N031224F0002/101
  • https://alinoma.jp/item/detail/1_180_N031224F0001/101
🟢 cast 100% avg similarity · ACRI 64–64
  • https://alinoma.jp/item/detail/1_143_N018724M0091/-1
  • https://alinoma.jp/item/detail/1_143_N018723F0050/-1
🟢 ssa 100% avg similarity · ACRI 64–64
  • https://alinoma.jp/item/detail/1_145_N020324S0028/BK
  • https://alinoma.jp/item/detail/1_145_N020322A0284/BK
🟢 nwjbb, women, men 100% avg similarity · ACRI 64–64
  • https://alinoma.jp/item/detail/1_141_141202402019539/45
  • https://alinoma.jp/item/detail/1_141_141202402019510/22
  • https://alinoma.jp/item/detail/1_141_141202402019535/41
  • https://alinoma.jp/item/detail/1_141_141202402019509/22
  • https://alinoma.jp/item/detail/1_141_141202402019540/22
🟢 baw 100% avg similarity · ACRI 64–64
  • https://alinoma.jp/item/detail/1_181_181202402019415/101
  • https://alinoma.jp/item/detail/1_181_181202402019416/101
  • https://alinoma.jp/item/detail/1_181_181202402019414/101
🟢 vsc 100% avg similarity · ACRI 64–64
  • https://alinoma.jp/item/detail/1_180_N000122S0046/102
  • https://alinoma.jp/item/detail/1_180_180202402017748/103
🟢 women, men, nwicb 100% avg similarity · ACRI 64–64
  • https://alinoma.jp/item/detail/1_141_141202402019516/22
  • https://alinoma.jp/item/detail/1_141_141202402019515/45
  • https://alinoma.jp/item/detail/1_141_141202402019514/45
Semantic Density measures how deeply your site covers each topic. High-density clusters (>92% similarity) mean multiple pages reinforce the same subject — this is positive for RAG/AI systems that need corroborating sources. Thin coverage (few clusters) means AI models have less evidence to cite you.
Get a full content consolidation plan for all 53313 high-density pairs
Unlock Consolidation Plan →
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to alinoma.jp. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Alinoma",
  "url": "https://alinoma.jp",
  "logo": "https://alinoma.jp/favicon.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Alinoma",
  "url": "https://alinoma.jp",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://alinoma.jp/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Alinoma?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Alinoma does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Alinoma work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Alinoma."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for alinoma.jp:

Current Score
82
Projected Score
98
Improvement
+16 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history