ak4.jp 74 B
🛡️ SEO 63 🤖 GEO 80 ⚡ Perf 62 🏗️ Arch 92

ak4.jp — Global SEODiff Score 74/100

ak4.jp
📊

With an ACRI of 90/100, ak4.jp stands out as one of the highest-performing sites in AI search visibility, outranking 99% of its peers. Compared to other infrastructure sites (avg score: 57), ak4.jp performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Content is delivered server-side, meaning bots and AI agents can parse the full page without executing JavaScript. A tight 3.8× token bloat ratio reflects disciplined markup: minimal noise between the crawler and the content it needs. Minimal structured data (1 block) limits the site's ability to communicate entity relationships to AI systems. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

74
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (62) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Fix title tag length → +3 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 1, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than ak4.jp?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)63 × 0.25 = 15.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)80 × 0.40 = 32.0
⚡ Performance (20% weight)62 × 0.20 = 12.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)92 × 0.15 = 13.8
Weighted sum = 15.8 + 32.0 + 12.4 + 13.8
Global SEODiff Score = 74 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
100
Structure
avg 36
42
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 8%
Rank #83388
-7 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 1%
Score 90/100

ak4.jp is more visible to Google than to AI models. There's room to improve AI discoverability to match your search reputation. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why ak4.jp ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat3.8×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

63/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

99 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

352 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 11
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://ak4.jp/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — クラウド勤怠管理システム「AKASHI」 | ソニービズネットワークス株式会社
  • ✓ og:description — クラウド型勤怠管理システムのAKASHIは、直感的に操作できるデザインを採用。出勤簿確認や実績修正、各種承認などが簡単に行なえます。15年以上のノウハウを活かした安全サポートもお客様から高い評価をいただいています。30日間無料でお試しいただけます。
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

80/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, plodopitomnik-sad.ru (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
ak4.jp
72
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. plodopitomnik-sad.ru has schema coverage of 12 blocks and uses Express. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 100/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 92 elements (92 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words243
Raw Density37.9%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

3/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

86
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability86/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

26%
🗑️ 74%
Useful Content (17.6 KB)Bloat (48.4 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio3.8× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context94% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage110 / 117 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

30 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 73.4% · SNR: 0.36 · Signal: 4503 / Noise: 12395 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of ak4.jp and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
AKASHI is a cloud-based time and attendance management system designed to streamline employee time tracking and improve workforce management for
Target Audience
Human resources managers, business owners, operations managers, payroll administrators, small business owners, retail managers, and managers of companies with hourly employees.
Pricing Model
Tiered pricing based on the number of employees, starting from a minimum of 10 employees with a monthly fee. Additional options include initial setup support.
🔗 Integration Partners
SmartHRMFクラウド給与freeeSAML
🏆 Competitive Moat
AKASHI’s competitive advantage lies in its comprehensive time tracking features, including GPS tracking, mobile app integration, and integration with popular HR and payroll systems, combined with a long-standing history of providing time tracking services (15+ years).
📊 Content Depth
8/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Integration directory pagesTemplate comparison pages
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Thin landing pages for features
• Lack of structured FAQ schema
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-04

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1438 ms
Raw HTML Size66.0 KB
Visible Text Size17.6 KB

Performance & Speed

62/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1438 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

760
DOM nodes
66 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

92/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://ak4.jp/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

67
internal links
8
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 72/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for ak4.jp
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/ak4.jp" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=ak4.jp" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 44 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
72
Single-page score
-24
Severe hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
48
Avg across 44 pages · Range 32–60
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 72, but internal pages average only 48 — a -24-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Total Words
6782
Avg Bloat
87.3×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://ak4.jp/faq
よくあるご質問 | クラウド勤怠管理システム「AKASHI」
pricing 60 43.8× 258 💰 Pricing
https://ak4.jp/faq/
よくあるご質問 | クラウド勤怠管理システム「AKASHI」
pricing 60 43.8× 258 💰 Pricing
https://ak4.jp/column/okr/
OKRとは?注目されている背景やMBO・KPIとの違いについて徹底解説 | 勤怠管理コラム(総務・人事のお役立ちコラム) | クラウド勤怠管理システム「AKASHI」
other 60 56.5× 213
https://ak4.jp/service/
サービス特長 | クラウド勤怠管理システム「AKASHI」
product 50 106.9× 80
https://ak4.jp/column/paid_holiday_right_to_change/
有給休暇の時季変更権とは?行使する際の条件と注意点を解説します | 勤怠管理コラム(総務・人事のお役立ちコラム) | クラウド勤怠管理システム「AKASHI」
other 50 92.6× 126
https://ak4.jp/column/work-life-integration/
ワークライフインテグレーションとは? ワークライフバランスとの違いや、メリット・デメリットについて解説します。 | 勤怠管理コラム(総務・人事のお役立ちコラム) | クラウド勤怠管理システム「AKASHI」
integrations 50 89.7× 142
https://ak4.jp/column/baseup/
ベースアップとは?導入することで得られるメリットや注意点について解説 | 勤怠管理コラム(総務・人事のお役立ちコラム) | クラウド勤怠管理システム「AKASHI」
other 50 86.6× 141
https://ak4.jp/column/action_goals/
行動目標とは?立て方や具体例について徹底解説 | 勤怠管理コラム(総務・人事のお役立ちコラム) | クラウド勤怠管理システム「AKASHI」
other 50 75.8× 158
https://ak4.jp/column/meister_system/
マイスター制度とは?導入することで得られる効果やデメリットについて解説 | 勤怠管理コラム(総務・人事のお役立ちコラム) | クラウド勤怠管理システム「AKASHI」
other 50 85.6× 141
https://ak4.jp/column/process_evaluation/
プロセス評価とは?導入することで得られる効果やデメリットについて解説 | 勤怠管理コラム(総務・人事のお役立ちコラム) | クラウド勤怠管理システム「AKASHI」
other 50 101.5× 120
https://ak4.jp/column/teaching/
ティーチングとは?導入する目的・問題点やコーチングとの違いについて解説 | 勤怠管理コラム(総務・人事のお役立ちコラム) | クラウド勤怠管理システム「AKASHI」
other 50 93.0× 128
https://ak4.jp/column/proo_bono/
プロボノとは?活用するメリットやデメリットについて徹底解説 | 勤怠管理コラム(総務・人事のお役立ちコラム) | クラウド勤怠管理システム「AKASHI」
other 50 73.3× 167
https://ak4.jp/column/horizontal_division_of_labor/
水平分業とは?垂直統合との違いについて徹底解説 | 勤怠管理コラム(総務・人事のお役立ちコラム) | クラウド勤怠管理システム「AKASHI」
other 50 88.6× 137
https://ak4.jp/column/referral_recruting/
リファラル採用とは?導入のメリット・デメリットや導入時の注意点を事例とともに解説します | 勤怠管理コラム(総務・人事のお役立ちコラム) | クラウド勤怠管理システム「AKASHI」
other 50 86.1× 141
https://ak4.jp/column/bani/
BANIとは?VUCAとの違いや、BANI時代を乗り越えるポイント | 勤怠管理コラム(総務・人事のお役立ちコラム) | クラウド勤怠管理システム「AKASHI」
other 50 90.1× 136
https://ak4.jp/column/star_job_interview/
STAR面接とは?導入することで得られる効果や注意点について徹底解説 | 勤怠管理コラム(総務・人事のお役立ちコラム) | クラウド勤怠管理システム「AKASHI」
careers 50 84.1× 144
https://ak4.jp/column/child_care_leave/
子の看護休暇とは?育児・介護休業法の改正で何が変わったのか? | 勤怠管理コラム(総務・人事のお役立ちコラム) | クラウド勤怠管理システム「AKASHI」
other 50 87.9× 131
https://ak4.jp/faq/%e3%80%8cakashi%e3%80%8d%e3%81%ae%e5%90%8d%e5%89%8d%e3%81%ae%e7%94%b1%e6%9d%a5%e3%81%af%e4%bd%95%e3%81%a7%e3%81%99%e3%81%8b%ef%bc%9f/
よくあるご質問 | クラウド勤怠管理システム「AKASHI」
pricing 47 77.0× 171 💰 Pricing
https://ak4.jp/faq/%e5%88%a9%e7%94%a8%e6%8e%a8%e5%a5%a8%e7%92%b0%e5%a2%83%e3%81%af%e3%81%a9%e3%81%86%e3%81%aa%e3%81%a3%e3%81%a6%e3%81%84%e3%81%be%e3%81%99%e3%81%8b%ef%bc%9f/
よくあるご質問 | クラウド勤怠管理システム「AKASHI」
pricing 47 77.2× 171 💰 Pricing
https://ak4.jp/faq/%e6%9c%89%e7%b5%a6%e4%bc%91%e6%9a%87%e3%81%ae%e7%94%b3%e8%ab%8b%e3%80%81%e7%ae%a1%e7%90%86%e3%80%81%e4%bb%98%e4%b8%8e%e3%81%af%e5%87%ba%e6%9d%a5%e3%81%be%e3%81%99%e3%81%8b%ef%bc%9f/
よくあるご質問 | クラウド勤怠管理システム「AKASHI」
pricing 47 77.6× 171 💰 Pricing
Showing 20 of 44 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/faq/ 26 48 0% 74.6× High JS Bloat
/column/ 14 51 0% 85.1× High JS Bloat
/api/ 1 32 0% 100.0× High JS Bloat
/service/ 1 50 0% 106.9× High JS Bloat
/improvement/ 1 37 0% 305.9× High JS Bloat
/function/ 1 37 0% 195.8× High JS Bloat
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/ak4.jp

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to ak4.jp. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
ak4.jp (this site) 72 90 WordPress 3.8× 1
profitserver.ru 86 90 WordPress 3.8× 2 Compare →
profitserver.net 86 90 WordPress 3.7× 2 Compare →
driphydration.com 86 95 WordPress 1.9× 2 Compare →
safely.co.jp 90 90 WordPress 1.9× 3 Compare →
meriambet.us.com 87 95 WordPress 4.1× 6 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite ak4.jp when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to ak4.jp. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Ak4?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Ak4 does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Ak4 work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Ak4."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for ak4.jp:

Current Score
90
Projected Score
93
Improvement
+3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history