absentify.com 47 D
🛡️ SEO 84 🤖 GEO 61 ⚡ Perf 34 🏗️ Arch 100
Radar → Domains → absentify.com

absentify.com — Global SEODiff Score 47/100

absentify.com
📊

With only 15/100 on the AI-Readiness Index, absentify.com is at severe risk of being overlooked by AI-powered search and answer engines. Within the infrastructure vertical, this places absentify.com below the industry average of 57 —, indicating room for competitive improvement. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. Heavy markup overhead (35.4× bloat) forces AI systems to wade through excess code before finding useful information. The presence of 4 structured data blocks ensures search engines and AI agents can accurately classify and extract entities from the page. Complete AI crawler restriction cuts this domain off from the growing AI search ecosystem entirely.

47
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Performance (34) needs urgent attention.
🎯 Top Fix: Allow GPTBot + ClaudeBot in robots.txt → lift the score cap
84
🛡️ Traditional SEO
61
🤖 AI Readiness
34
⚡ Performance
100
🏗️ Architecture
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than absentify.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)84 × 0.25 = 21.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)61 × 0.40 = 24.4
⚡ Performance (20% weight)34 × 0.20 = 6.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)100 × 0.15 = 15.0
Weighted sum = 21.0 + 24.4 + 6.8 + 15.0
⚠️ Fatal multiplier: All major AI bots blocked → ×0.5
Global SEODiff Score = 47 (D)
🚫
Gatekeeper Rule: Score cannot exceed 15. Both GPTBot and ClaudeBot are blocked in robots.txt. No major AI assistant can cite this site. Allow at least one major AI crawler to lift the cap. See Bot Access →
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
20
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
31
Structure
avg 35
88
Schema
avg 10
70
Tech Stack
avg 64
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 50%+
Rank #742303
-11 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 63%
Score 15/100

absentify.com is more visible to Google than to AI models. There's room to improve AI discoverability to match your search reputation. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why absentify.com ranks here

Tech stackNext.js
Industryinfrastructure
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage4 blocks
Token bloat35.4×

Fastest improvements

  • Allow GPTBot in robots.txt so AI crawlers can access your pages (see Crawl Access).
  • Allow ClaudeBot (many assistants rely on it) — blocking it often correlates with “AI invisibility.”
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
See other Next.js sites → infrastructure industry → Full leaderboard → Domain A–Z →
🛡️

Traditional SEO

84/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

47 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

110 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 10
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://absentify.com
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Absence management software for Microsoft Teams
  • ✓ og:description — Vacation and absence planning software in Microsoft Teams ➡️ Seamless integration ✓ Use it now for free!
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

61/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
absentify.com
49
Your ACRI Score
→
safely.co.jp
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

❌
GPTBot (OpenAI)
Blocked
❌
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Blocked
❌
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Blocked
❌
Google-Extended
Blocked
✅
Googlebot
Allowed
💡GPTBot is blocked. To appear in ChatGPT citations, add Allow: / under User-agent: GPTBot in your robots.txt.
💡ClaudeBot is blocked. To be cited by Claude, allow ClaudeBot in robots.txt.

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 31/100 — Low
Structured Elements 55 elements (55 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1853
Raw Density3.0%
💡Low structure score (31/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 55 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ✅ Present
Total Schema Blocks4 blocks

Schema Coverage Map

5/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
✅ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
✅ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

59
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
Critical
Blocklist Risk
Extractability59/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (80/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskCritical — 4 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

2%
🗑️ 98%
Useful Content (12.2 KB)Bloat (420.1 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio35.4× — Bloated

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage82 / 82 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 432.4 KB, but only 12.2 KB is text. 2% useful / 98% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (35.4×) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 97.2% · SNR: 0.03 · Signal: 3131 / Noise: 107554 tokens
Run Full Entropy Audit →

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkNext.js
AI-Readiness Score70/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time2453 ms
Raw HTML Size432.4 KB
Visible Text Size12.2 KB
⚡

Performance & Speed

34/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

2453 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1357
DOM nodes
432 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → s-maxage=31536000, stale-while-revalidate=2592000
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

100/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://absentify.com/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✗ GPTBot allowed
  • ✗ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

62
internal links
2
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 49/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for absentify.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold 
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/absentify.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=absentify.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 5 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
49
Single-page score
+8
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
57
Avg across 5 pages · Range 42–69
Topical Cohesion
9%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
4850
Avg Bloat
129.2×
RAG Fractures
4
Ext. Citations
7
⚠️
4 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 4 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://absentify.com/pricing
Pricing: Flexible Plans for Teams of All Sizes
 pricing 69 49.6× 2354 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://absentify.com/features
All Absence Management Features for Microsoft 365
 pricing 66 64.2× 1186 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://absentify.com/blog
absentify Blog: Vacation & Absence Planning
 pricing 65 88.6× 726 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://absentify.com/case-studies
Case Studies: Customer Success Stories
 pricing 45 268.8× 199 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://absentify.com/docs
Welcome to the absentify® documentation - absentify®
 pricing 42 174.9× 385 💰 Pricing
🔗
Outbound External Citations
7 unique external domains cited across 5 pages
youtube.com ×5
linkedin.com ×5
status.absentify.com ×4
app.absentify.com ×4
feedback.absentify.com ×4
mintlify.com ×1
x.com ×1
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API. 

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/absentify.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to absentify.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
absentify.com (this site) 49 15 Next.js 35.4× 4 —
jwt.io 50 70 Next.js 35.4× 4 Compare →
chatsimple.ai 52 73 Next.js 35.8× 4 Compare →
expertise.ai 52 73 Next.js 35.8× 4 Compare →
falconlinkvpn.com 49 72 Next.js 35.0× 3 Compare →
zarminex.ir 50 73 Next.js 35.8× 5 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to absentify.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Allow GPTBot in robots.txt
High Impact ⏱ 2 min
GPTBot is blocked — your content cannot appear in ChatGPT citations. Add this to your robots.txt:
text 
User-agent: GPTBot
Allow: /

User-agent: ChatGPT-User
Allow: /
Allow ClaudeBot in robots.txt
Medium Impact ⏱ 2 min
ClaudeBot is blocked — Claude cannot cite your content. Many AI assistants rely on it.
text 
User-agent: ClaudeBot
Allow: /

User-agent: anthropic-ai
Allow: /
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 2% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html 
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for absentify.com:

Current Score
15
Projected Score
33
Improvement
+18 pts
Allow GPTBot +8 pts
Allow ClaudeBot +5 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

📄 Generate llms.txt 📊 Export JSON Data 📸 Download Visual

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking
Open My Site report → Open Self-Diffing incidents → Open History timeline →

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history

📚 Research & Documentation

🔬
The Science of ACRI
Methodology behind the AI-Crawler Reality Index scoring model.
🚨
Hallucination Risk Study
How poor crawl access increases AI fabrication rates by 3.5×.
🔥
Structural Entropy Paper
The median web page wastes 55% of tokens on noise. Here's the data.
🧪
Extraction Lab Paper
Causal evidence that semantic HTML structure increases AI extraction accuracy.
📖
Documentation Hub
Metrics definitions, fix guides, and API reference for CI/CD integration.
🛠️
Free Tools
llms.txt generator, hallucination checker, entropy audit, and more.