2action.link 60 C
🛡️ SEO 42 🤖 GEO 72 ⚡ Perf 68 🏗️ Arch 46

2action.link — Global SEODiff Score 60/100

2action.link
📊

With a solid 74/100 ACRI, 2action.link is well-positioned for AI search — better than 79% of sites in the Radar. Compared to other infrastructure sites (avg score: 57), 2action.link performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. The token bloat ratio sits at a lean 4.1×, meaning the ratio of code to visible content is efficient — crawlers spend their token budget on actual information. The complete absence of JSON-LD schema is a missed opportunity: even basic Organization markup would improve how AI crawlers understand this domain. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

60
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (42) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add Organization + WebSite JSON-LD → +5–8 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 25, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than 2action.link?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)42 × 0.25 = 10.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)72 × 0.40 = 28.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)68 × 0.20 = 13.6
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)46 × 0.15 = 6.9
Weighted sum = 10.5 + 28.8 + 13.6 + 6.9
Global SEODiff Score = 60 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
73
Structure
avg 35
0
Schema
avg 10
50
Tech Stack
avg 64
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 24%
Rank #238746
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 21%
Score 74/100

2action.link has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why 2action.link ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat4.1×

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

42/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

61 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

640 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✗ Has <h2> headings — found 0
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://action.group/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✗ HTML lang attribute
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Группа Актион — официальный сайт
  • ✓ og:description — Группа Актион — российская медиакомпания № 1. Мы выпускаем справочные и справочно-образовательные системы, электронные журналы и сервисы и курсы онлайн-обучения для профессионалов. Помогаем в работе специалистам 12 направлений: бухгалтерия, финансы, управление, право, кадры, охрана труда, медицина, образование, культура, ЖКХ, госзаказ и госфинансы
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

72/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
2action.link
53
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 73/100 — Good
Structured Elements 23 elements (23 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words143
Raw Density16.1%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

67
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability67/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (10/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

24%
🗑️ 76%
Useful Content (7.7 KB)Bloat (23.9 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio4.1× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage11 / 11 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

23 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 75.5% · SNR: 0.32 · Signal: 1982 / Noise: 6107 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Server
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1190 ms
Raw HTML Size31.6 KB
Visible Text Size7.7 KB

Performance & Speed

68/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1190 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

200
DOM nodes
32 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

46/100 15 % of Global Score 🔴 Low Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

0
internal links
25
external links
Very few internal links — crawlers may miss important pages

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✗ HTML lang attribute
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 53/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for 2action.link
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/2action.link" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=2action.link" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 9 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
53
Single-page score
-14
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
39
Avg across 9 pages · Range 39–39
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 53, but internal pages average only 39 — a -14-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Total Words
972
Avg Bloat
59.9×
Ext. Citations
14
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://2action.link/pricing
Группа Актион — официальный сайт
pricing 39 59.9× 108 💰 Pricing
https://2action.link/about
Группа Актион — официальный сайт
about 39 59.9× 108
https://2action.link/products
Группа Актион — официальный сайт
product 39 59.9× 108
https://2action.link/features
Группа Актион — официальный сайт
product 39 59.9× 108
https://2action.link/blog
Группа Актион — официальный сайт
blog 39 59.9× 108
https://2action.link/docs
Группа Актион — официальный сайт
docs 39 59.9× 108
https://2action.link/contact
Группа Актион — официальный сайт
support 39 59.9× 108
https://2action.link/faq
Группа Актион — официальный сайт
support 39 59.9× 108
https://2action.link/integrations
Группа Актион — официальный сайт
integrations 39 59.9× 108
🔗
Outbound External Citations
14 unique external domains cited across 9 pages
action-buh.ru ×9
id2.action-media.ru ×9
action-ot.ru ×9
action-pravo.ru ×9
action-upravlenie.ru ×9
action-finans.ru ×9
vk.com ×9
action-gosfinansy.ru ×9
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/2action.link

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to 2action.link. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
2action.link (this site) 53 74 Custom / Proprietary 4.1× 0
shootingtimes.com 53 68 Custom / Proprietary 4.1× 0 Compare →
educaplay.com 53 68 Custom / Proprietary 4.1× 0 Compare →
bbus.ru 53 68 Custom / Proprietary 4.1× 0 Compare →
kg-portal.ru 53 68 Custom / Proprietary 4.1× 0 Compare →
saralpath.com 53 69 Custom / Proprietary 4.1× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to 2action.link. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Link",
  "url": "https://2action.link",
  "logo": "https://action.group/local/templates/main/favicon.svg",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Link",
  "url": "https://2action.link",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://2action.link/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for 2action.link:

Current Score
74
Projected Score
87
Improvement
+13 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history