zoimas.com 68 C
🛡️ SEO 74 🤖 GEO 88 ⚡ Perf 34 🏗️ Arch 52

zoimas.com — Global SEODiff Score 68/100

zoimas.com
📊

Registering an exceptional 88/100 on the AI-Crawler Reality Index, zoimas.com sits in the highest tier of AI extractability among indexed domains. Within the infrastructure vertical, this places zoimas.com above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Content is delivered server-side, meaning bots and AI agents can parse the full page without executing JavaScript. The token bloat ratio sits at a lean 4.0×, meaning the ratio of code to visible content is efficient — crawlers spend their token budget on actual information. The presence of 4 structured data blocks ensures search engines and AI agents can accurately classify and extract entities from the page. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

68
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (34) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 25, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than zoimas.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)74 × 0.25 = 18.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)88 × 0.40 = 35.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)34 × 0.20 = 6.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)52 × 0.15 = 7.8
Weighted sum = 18.5 + 35.2 + 6.8 + 7.8
Global SEODiff Score = 68 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
97
Rendering
avg 93
75
Structure
avg 35
88
Schema
avg 10
60
Tech Stack
avg 64
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 50%+
Rank #553262
-54 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 1%
Score 88/100

zoimas.com ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 50%+) than in AI search (Top 1%). This is the 'Invisible Giant' pattern — implement the patches above to close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why zoimas.com ranks here

Tech stackMagento
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage4 blocks
Token bloat4.0×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

74/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

36 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

81 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 2
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 3
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.pigradio.com/about/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — SURGA22 Mahjong Ways 2 PG Soft Gacor
  • ✓ og:description — SURGA22 hadirkan Mahjong Ways 2 PG Soft gacor, free spin melimpah dan RTP tinggi.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

88/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, plodopitomnik-sad.ru (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
zoimas.com
77
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. plodopitomnik-sad.ru has schema coverage of 12 blocks and uses Express. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 10%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 75/100 — Good
Structured Elements 134 elements (134 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words793
Raw Density16.9%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ✅ Present
Total Schema Blocks4 blocks

Schema Coverage Map

5/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
✅ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
✅ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

89
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability89/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (50/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

25%
🗑️ 75%
Useful Content (51.0 KB)Bloat (152.6 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio4.0× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context75% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage9 / 12 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

25 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 75.0% · SNR: 0.33 · Signal: 13052 / Noise: 39073 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

A local LLM (mlx-community/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-4bit) analyzed the extracted content of zoimas.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Mahjong Ways 2 PG Soft Gacor slot game
Target Audience
Gamblers and slot game enthusiasts
Pricing Model
Free to play, in-game purchases
Model: mlx-community/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-4bit · Analyzed: 2026-02-26 · Data extracted from the site’s main content via strict JSON prompting.

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkMagento
AI-Readiness Score60/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time3596 ms
Raw HTML Size203.6 KB
Visible Text Size51.0 KB

Performance & Speed

34/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

3596 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

829
DOM nodes
204 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✓ CDN cache status → DYNAMIC
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

4
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Moderate trackers — consider lazy-loading non-essential scripts
googletagmanager.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

52/100 15 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

2
internal links
202
external links
Limited internal links — consider adding contextual cross-links

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 77/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for zoimas.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/zoimas.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=zoimas.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to zoimas.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
zoimas.com (this site) 77 88 Magento 4.0× 4
slothacker22.com 77 91 Magento 4.1× 4 Compare →
to288-pit.com 77 81 Magento 3.8× 4 Compare →
mastersathletics.net 76 90 Magento 4.0× 4 Compare →
antoniolenis.edu.co 77 79 Magento 3.3× 4 Compare →
hoki138prize.com 78 89 Magento 4.4× 4 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to zoimas.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Zoimas",
  "url": "https://zoimas.com",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://zoimas.com/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for zoimas.com:

Current Score
88
Projected Score
92
Improvement
+4 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history