wspinanie.pl 73 B
🛡️ SEO 63 🤖 GEO 87 ⚡ Perf 59 🏗️ Arch 70

wspinanie.pl — Global SEODiff Score 73/100

wspinanie.pl
📊

The AI-Readiness profile for wspinanie.pl is strong: an ACRI of 81/100 places it ahead of 95% of domains in the index. Compared to other infrastructure sites (avg score: 57), wspinanie.pl performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The low ghost ratio (0%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. With a 3.6× bloat ratio, the page delivers its content without excessive boilerplate, giving AI systems a clean extraction path. With 4 JSON-LD schema blocks, the site provides explicit machine-readable metadata that enhances AI comprehension. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

73
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (59) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 16, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 6 snapshots
Feb 23 Mar 16
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 16 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than wspinanie.pl?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)63 × 0.25 = 15.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)87 × 0.40 = 34.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)59 × 0.20 = 11.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)70 × 0.15 = 10.5
Weighted sum = 15.8 + 34.8 + 11.8 + 10.5
Global SEODiff Score = 73 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 94
51
Structure
avg 35
48
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 38%
Rank #379169
-32 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 5%
Score 81/100

wspinanie.pl ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 38%) than in AI search (Top 5%). This is the 'Visibility Gap' pattern — implementing the recommendations above can help close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why wspinanie.pl ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage4 blocks
Token bloat3.6×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

63/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

30 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

144 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 79
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://wspinanie.pl/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → pl
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Strona Główna
  • ✓ og:description — Największy polski serwis wspinaczkowy. Działamy od 1999 roku. Najnowsze informacje ze wspinania skałkowego, alpinizmu, himalaizmu i zawodów.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

87/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
wspinanie.pl
73
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 51/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 86 elements (86 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1120
Raw Density7.7%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks4 blocks

Schema Coverage Map

4/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
✅ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

72
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability72/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

27%
🗑️ 73%
Useful Content (46.0 KB)Bloat (121.5 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio3.6× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage94 / 94 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

35 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 72.6% · SNR: 0.38 · Signal: 11764 / Noise: 31095 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of wspinanie.pl and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Wspinanie.pl is a digital platform providing comprehensive content and resources for climbers of all levels, encompassing rock climbing, bouldering, alpinism,
Target Audience
Climbers (all levels), mountaineers, ski mountaineers, outdoor enthusiasts, and adventure sports fans.
Pricing Model
Subscription-based with various tiers offering access to premium content and features. Specific pricing details are not explicitly stated, but includes a ‘Księgarnia’ (bookstore) with individual product sales.
🔗 Integration Partners
OCUNSuuntoNorco
🛡️ Compliance Standards
RECALL
🏆 Competitive Moat
Extensive content library, active community forum, and a focus on providing in-depth information and resources for a wide range of climbing disciplines – creating a strong ecosystem for climbers.
📊 Content Depth
8/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Integration directory pagesTemplate comparison pagesEvent calendar pagesBlog posts covering various climbing topics
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Thin landing pages for features
• Lack of structured FAQ schema
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-17

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time752 ms
Raw HTML Size167.4 KB
Visible Text Size46.0 KB

Performance & Speed

59/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

752 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1370
DOM nodes
167 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → max-age=3, must-revalidate
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

2
tracker scripts
2
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.comgooglesyndication.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

70/100 15 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

187
internal links
7
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → pl
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 73/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for wspinanie.pl
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/wspinanie.pl" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=wspinanie.pl" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
73
Single-page score
-5
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
68
Avg across 10 pages · Range 64–69
Topical Cohesion
0%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
8719
Avg Bloat
37.9×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://wspinanie.pl/pricing
wspinanie.pl | Strona Główna
pricing 69 37.3× 902
https://wspinanie.pl/about
wspinanie.pl | Strona Główna
about 69 37.3× 902
https://wspinanie.pl/features
wspinanie.pl | Strona Główna
product 69 37.3× 902
https://wspinanie.pl/products
wspinanie.pl | Strona Główna
product 69 37.3× 902
https://wspinanie.pl/docs
wspinanie.pl | Strona Główna
docs 69 37.3× 902
https://wspinanie.pl/case-studies
wspinanie.pl | Strona Główna
social-proof 69 37.3× 902
https://wspinanie.pl/contact
wspinanie.pl | Strona Główna
support 69 37.3× 902
https://wspinanie.pl/faq
wspinanie.pl | Strona Główna
support 69 37.3× 902
https://wspinanie.pl/integrations
wspinanie.pl | Strona Główna
integrations 69 37.3× 902
https://wspinanie.pl/blog
Blog Oli Przybysz na wspinanie.pl | wspinanie.pl
blog 64 42.6× 601
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/case-studies/ 1 69 0% 37.3× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 69 0% 37.3× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 69 0% 37.3× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 69 0% 37.3× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 1 69 0% 37.3× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 1 69 0% 37.3× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 69 0% 37.3× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 69 0% 37.3× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 69 0% 37.3× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 64 0% 42.6× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
facebook.com ×10
emphie.com ×10
kursy.wspinanie.pl ×10
youtube.com ×10
forum.wspinanie.pl ×10
instagram.com ×10
x.com ×10
ksiegarnia.wspinanie.pl ×10
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/wspinanie.pl

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to wspinanie.pl. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
wspinanie.pl (this site) 73 81 WordPress 3.6× 4
profitserver.ru 86 90 WordPress 3.8× 2 Compare →
profitserver.net 86 90 WordPress 3.8× 2 Compare →
meriambet.us.com 87 95 WordPress 4.1× 6 Compare →
driphydration.com 86 95 WordPress 1.9× 2 Compare →
safely.co.jp 90 90 WordPress 1.9× 3 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite wspinanie.pl when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to wspinanie.pl. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Wspinanie?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Wspinanie does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Wspinanie work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Wspinanie."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for wspinanie.pl:

Current Score
81
Projected Score
84
Improvement
+3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history