whiteessence.com 70 B
🛡️ SEO 56 🤖 GEO 89 ⚡ Perf 40 🏗️ Arch 83

whiteessence.com — Global SEODiff Score 70/100

whiteessence.com
📊

whiteessence.com achieves a 81/100 on the AI-Crawler Reality Index, reflecting above-average readiness for AI-driven discovery. Within the infrastructure vertical, this places whiteessence.com above the industry average of 58 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Content is delivered server-side, meaning bots and AI agents can parse the full page without executing JavaScript. A tight 3.0× token bloat ratio reflects disciplined markup: minimal noise between the crawler and the content it needs. Rich structured data (5 schema blocks) gives AI systems strong semantic signals for entity recognition and knowledge graph inclusion. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

70
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (40) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Fix title tag length → +3 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 27, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 5 snapshots
Feb 24 Feb 27
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than whiteessence.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)56 × 0.25 = 14.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)89 × 0.40 = 35.6
⚡ Performance (20% weight)40 × 0.20 = 8.0
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)83 × 0.15 = 12.4
Weighted sum = 14.0 + 35.6 + 8.0 + 12.4
Global SEODiff Score = 70 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
99
Structure
avg 36
10
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 50%+
Rank #714520
-66 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 5%
Score 81/100

whiteessence.com ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 50%+) than in AI search (Top 5%). This is the 'Invisible Giant' pattern — implement the patches above to close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why whiteessence.com ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage5 blocks
Token bloat3.0×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

56/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

84 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

177 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 10
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✗ Canonical tag present
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — 【全国337医院】ホワイトニング専門歯科 ホワイトエッセンス
  • ✓ og:description — 医療ホワイトニングはホワイトエッセンス。「白さ」「清潔感」「健康」を生涯ずっと。あなたの笑顔を私たちがサポートします。
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

89/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
whiteessence.com
79
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 99/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 154 elements (154 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words525
Raw Density29.3%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks5 blocks

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
✅ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

77
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability77/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

33%
🗑️ 67%
Useful Content (27.3 KB)Bloat (54.7 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio3.0× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage50 / 50 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

50 Entropy
Fair Token Bloat: Medium
Noise Ratio: 66.7% · SNR: 0.50 · Signal: 6983 / Noise: 13992 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

A local LLM (mlx-community/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-4bit) analyzed the extracted content of whiteessence.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
医疗牙齿美白服务
Target Audience
牙齿需要美白的患者
Pricing Model
未提及
Model: mlx-community/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-4bit · Analyzed: 2026-02-26 · Data extracted from the site’s main content via strict JSON prompting.

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
ServerApache
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time3423 ms
Raw HTML Size81.9 KB
Visible Text Size27.3 KB

Performance & Speed

40/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

3423 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1281
DOM nodes
82 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

83/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.whiteessence.com/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

141
internal links
12
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 79/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for whiteessence.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/whiteessence.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=whiteessence.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 2 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
79
Single-page score
-30
Severe hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
50
Avg across 2 pages · Range 39–60
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 79, but internal pages average only 50 — a -30-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Total Words
415
Avg Bloat
54.4×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://whiteessence.com/faq
ホワイトニングについてよくあるご質問|【ホワイトエッセンス】
support 60 67.6× 255
https://whiteessence.com/about
ホワイトエッセンスのホワイトニングについて|【ホワイトエッセンス】
about 39 41.1× 160
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/faq/ 1 60 0% 67.6× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 39 0% 41.1× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 2 pages
rsv.whiteessence.com ×2
shop.whiteessence.com ×2
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/whiteessence.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to whiteessence.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
whiteessence.com (this site) 79 81 Custom / Proprietary 3.0× 5
kruizinga.nl 87 93 Custom / Proprietary 3.0× 5 Compare →
kobekyo.com 86 94 Custom / Proprietary 3.1× 6 Compare →
kondela.hu 86 93 Custom / Proprietary 3.1× 4 Compare →
churchfind.com.au 86 87 Custom / Proprietary 4.9× 4 Compare →
pubsandclubs.com.au 86 87 Custom / Proprietary 4.9× 4 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to whiteessence.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Whiteessence",
  "url": "https://whiteessence.com",
  "logo": "https://whiteessence.com/logo.png",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for whiteessence.com:

Current Score
81
Projected Score
87
Improvement
+6 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history