wavel.ai 77 B
🛡️ SEO 76 🤖 GEO 87 ⚡ Perf 47 🏗️ Arch 92

wavel.ai — Global SEODiff Score 77/100

wavel.ai
📊

With a solid 84/100 ACRI, wavel.ai is well-positioned for AI search — better than 98% of sites in the Radar. Compared to other infrastructure sites (avg score: 57), wavel.ai performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The low ghost ratio (0%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. A tight 2.8× token bloat ratio reflects disciplined markup: minimal noise between the crawler and the content it needs. Rich structured data (6 schema blocks) gives AI systems strong semantic signals for entity recognition and knowledge graph inclusion. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

77
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (47) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Fix title tag length → +3 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 15, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 6 snapshots
Feb 23 Mar 15
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
📈 Mar 15 ACRI +13 (60→73)
📈 Mar 15 ACRI +13 (60→73)
Does your site score higher than wavel.ai?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)76 × 0.25 = 19.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)87 × 0.40 = 34.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)47 × 0.20 = 9.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)92 × 0.15 = 13.8
Weighted sum = 19.0 + 34.8 + 9.4 + 13.8
Global SEODiff Score = 77 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 94
33
Structure
avg 36
92
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 30%
Rank #303558
-28 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 2%
Score 84/100

wavel.ai ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 30%) than in AI search (Top 2%). This is the 'Visibility Gap' pattern — implementing the recommendations above can help close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why wavel.ai ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage6 blocks
Token bloat2.8×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

76/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

73 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

175 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 17
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://wavel.ai/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Wavel
  • ✓ og:description — Transform scripts & videos into share-ready content. Dub with voice cloning, add subtitles, edit with B-rolls & personalize videos with templates, avatars & human-like voices.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

87/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
wavel.ai
73
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 33/100 — Low
Structured Elements 82 elements (82 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words2554
Raw Density3.2%
💡Low structure score (33/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 82 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ✅ Present
Total Schema Blocks6 blocks

Schema Coverage Map

6/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
✅ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
✅ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

78
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability78/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (80/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

35%
🗑️ 65%
Useful Content (234.1 KB)Bloat (428.2 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio2.8× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context96% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage188 / 195 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

55 Entropy
Fair Token Bloat: Medium
Noise Ratio: 64.7% · SNR: 0.55 · Signal: 59941 / Noise: 109630 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of wavel.ai and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Wavel AI is an AI-powered platform that enables creators and businesses to produce multilingual, voice-enriched content at scale, offering features
Target Audience
Content creators, marketers, educators, developers, media teams, businesses seeking global content localization, e-learning providers, and enterprises needing multimedia content automation.
Pricing Model
Free tier with Lite, Pro, and Scale plans. Monthly pricing: $25/month, $40/month, $100/month. Yearly pricing: $216/year, $312/year, $624/year.
🔗 Integration Partners
SlackGitHubAPI integrations
🛡️ Compliance Standards
SOC 2
🏆 Competitive Moat
AI-powered sprint planning with real-time resource optimization and a comprehensive suite of tools for multilingual content creation.
📊 Content Depth
9/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Integration directory pagesTemplate comparison pages
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Thin landing pages for features
• Lack of structured FAQ schema
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-14

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time522 ms
Raw HTML Size662.4 KB
Visible Text Size234.1 KB

Performance & Speed

47/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

522 ms
Acceptable — room for improvement

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1812
DOM nodes
662 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → max-age=273, must-revalidate
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

92/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://wavel.ai/sitemap_index.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

253
internal links
16
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 73/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for wavel.ai
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/wavel.ai" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=wavel.ai" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
73
Single-page score
-10
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
64
Avg across 10 pages · Range 37–69
Topical Cohesion
7%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
14615
Avg Bloat
86.4×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://wavel.ai/products
Wavel AI | Create & Dub Videos Instantly with AI – Fast, Easy, Scalable
pricing 69 87.9× 1913 💰 Pricing
https://wavel.ai/features
Wavel AI | Create & Dub Videos Instantly with AI – Fast, Easy, Scalable
pricing 69 87.9× 1913 💰 Pricing
https://wavel.ai/docs
Wavel AI | Create & Dub Videos Instantly with AI – Fast, Easy, Scalable
pricing 69 87.9× 1913 💰 Pricing
https://wavel.ai/case-studies
Wavel AI | Create & Dub Videos Instantly with AI – Fast, Easy, Scalable
pricing 69 87.9× 1913 💰 Pricing
https://wavel.ai/faq
Wavel AI | Create & Dub Videos Instantly with AI – Fast, Easy, Scalable
pricing 69 87.9× 1913 💰 Pricing
https://wavel.ai/pricing
Pricing- Localization and Powering Content Performance | Wavel
pricing 64 164.4× 768 💰 Pricing
https://wavel.ai/about
Complete Wavel AI AI Review 2025 – Tools, Features & Top Alternatives
pricing 64 71.9× 1728 💰 Pricing
https://wavel.ai/blog
Blog - Wavel
pricing 64 154.1× 769 💰 Pricing
https://wavel.ai/integrations integrations 61 21.9× 1749
https://wavel.ai/contact support 37 11.6× 36
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/products/ 1 69 0% 87.9× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 69 0% 87.9× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 64 0% 164.4× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 64 0% 71.9× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 64 0% 154.1× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 1 61 0% 21.9× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 37 0% 11.6× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 69 0% 87.9× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 69 0% 87.9× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 1 69 0% 87.9× High JS Bloat
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/wavel.ai

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to wavel.ai. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
wavel.ai (this site) 73 84 WordPress 2.8× 6
meriambet.us.com 87 95 WordPress 4.1× 6 Compare →
profitserver.net 86 90 WordPress 3.8× 2 Compare →
profitserver.ru 86 90 WordPress 3.8× 2 Compare →
safely.co.jp 90 90 WordPress 1.9× 3 Compare →
grupocasalima.com 87 96 WordPress 11.4× 5 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite wavel.ai when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history