visualmodo.com 77 B
🛡️ SEO 84 🤖 GEO 82 ⚡ Perf 47 🏗️ Arch 91

visualmodo.com — Global SEODiff Score 77/100

visualmodo.com
📊

With a solid 75/100 ACRI, visualmodo.com is well-positioned for AI search — better than 82% of sites in the Radar. In the developer sector, visualmodo.com outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. The 7.4× token bloat ratio falls within the normal range, though there is room to trim navigation, footer, and script overhead. The presence of 4 structured data blocks ensures search engines and AI agents can accurately classify and extract entities from the page. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

77
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (47) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 25, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than visualmodo.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)84 × 0.25 = 21.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)82 × 0.40 = 32.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)47 × 0.20 = 9.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)91 × 0.15 = 13.7
Weighted sum = 21.0 + 32.8 + 9.4 + 13.7
Global SEODiff Score = 77 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
22
Structure
avg 35
48
Schema
avg 10
85
Tech Stack
avg 64
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 34%
Rank #344309
-16 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 18%
Score 75/100

visualmodo.com ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 34%) than in AI search (Top 18%). This is the 'Invisible Giant' pattern — implement the patches above to close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why visualmodo.com ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
Industrydeveloper
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage4 blocks
Token bloat7.4×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

84/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

61 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

141 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 7
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://visualmodo.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Visualmodo - WordPress Themes, Plugins & Templates That Works
  • ✓ og:description — Powerful, flexible & beautiful tools and web resources. Visualmodo provides the best WordPress themes, plugins & templates that build results
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

82/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the developer sector, bestaccessdoors.com (ACRI: 88) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
visualmodo.com
61
Your ACRI Score
88
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. bestaccessdoors.com has schema coverage of 8 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 22/100 — Low
Structured Elements 21 elements (21 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1500
Raw Density1.4%
💡Low structure score (22/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 21 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks4 blocks

Schema Coverage Map

4/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
✅ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

57
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability57/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

13%
🗑️ 87%
Useful Content (22.2 KB)Bloat (141.4 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio7.4× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context87% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage13 / 15 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 86.4% · SNR: 0.16 · Signal: 5689 / Noise: 36209 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1689 ms
Raw HTML Size163.7 KB
Visible Text Size22.2 KB

Performance & Speed

47/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1689 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

845
DOM nodes
164 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

91/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://visualmodo.com/sitemap_index.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

63
internal links
10
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 61/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for visualmodo.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/visualmodo.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=visualmodo.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 8 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
61
Single-page score
+7
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
68
Avg across 8 pages · Range 64–72
Topical Cohesion
17%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
7332
Avg Bloat
25.6×
RAG Fractures
8
Ext. Citations
46
⚠️
8 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 8 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://visualmodo.com/features
Features & Stickers To Include In Instagram Stories For Businesses
pricing 72 15.3× 1320 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://visualmodo.com/case-studies
How Brands Successfully Used Apps to Buy Instagram Followers
pricing 72 19.5× 1005 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://visualmodo.com/faq
FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions - Visualmodo WordPress Themes
pricing 72 16.9× 879 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://visualmodo.com/pricing
Buy WordPress Themes, Templates & Plugins - Visualmodo Pricing
pricing 69 29.9× 1073 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://visualmodo.com/blog
Blog - Web Design & Development Magazine by Visualmodo
pricing 67 28.2× 658 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://visualmodo.com/docs
Docs Archive - Visualmodo
pricing 67 20.5× 1053 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://visualmodo.com/about
About Visualmodo Company - WordPress Themes, Plugins & More
pricing 64 44.8× 614 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://visualmodo.com/contact
Starting with Contact Form 7 WordPress Plugin - Visualmodo
pricing 64 29.7× 730 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
🔗
Outbound External Citations
46 unique external domains cited across 8 pages
linkedin.com ×8
pinterest.com ×8
youtube.com ×8
instagram.com ×8
x.com ×8
facebook.com ×8
profiles.wordpress.org ×8
en.wikipedia.org ×5
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/visualmodo.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar developer Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to visualmodo.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
visualmodo.com (this site) 61 75 WordPress 7.4× 4
webs.limited 60 76 WordPress 7.5× 4 Compare →
mbmx2.com 62 74 WordPress 7.6× 4 Compare →
lokalno.mk 61 77 WordPress 7.4× 3 Compare →
suddimoola.in 63 78 WordPress 8.1× 4 Compare →
kjc.onl 61 77 WordPress 7.5× 3 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for visualmodo.com:

Current Score
75
Projected Score
78
Improvement
+3 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history