tune720.com 68 C
🛡️ SEO 77 🤖 GEO 81 ⚡ Perf 39 🏗️ Arch 57

tune720.com — Global SEODiff Score 68/100

tune720.com
📊

tune720.com achieves a 81/100 on the AI-Crawler Reality Index, reflecting above-average readiness for AI-driven discovery. Within the infrastructure vertical, this places tune720.com above the industry average of 58 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. The token bloat ratio sits at a lean 1.5×, meaning the ratio of code to visible content is efficient — crawlers spend their token budget on actual information. Rich structured data (4 schema blocks) gives AI systems strong semantic signals for entity recognition and knowledge graph inclusion. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

68
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (39) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than tune720.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)77 × 0.25 = 19.2
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)81 × 0.40 = 32.4
⚡ Performance (20% weight)39 × 0.20 = 7.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)57 × 0.15 = 8.5
Weighted sum = 19.2 + 32.4 + 7.8 + 8.5
Global SEODiff Score = 68 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
38
Structure
avg 36
88
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 22%
Rank #221567
-17 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 5%
Score 81/100

tune720.com ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 22%) than in AI search (Top 5%). This is the 'Invisible Giant' pattern — implement the patches above to close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why tune720.com ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage4 blocks
Token bloat1.5×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

77/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

67 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

187 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 20
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✗ Canonical tag present
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ko
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✗ og:title
  • ✗ og:description
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

81/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
tune720.com
71
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 38/100 — Low
Structured Elements 291 elements (231 lists, 26 rows, 34 headers)
Total Words6624
Raw Density4.4%
💡Low structure score (38/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 231 list items, 26 table rows, 34 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ✅ Present
Total Schema Blocks4 blocks

Schema Coverage Map

5/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
✅ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
✅ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

78
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability78/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

66%
🗑️ 34%
Useful Content (113.7 KB)Bloat (55.1 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio1.5× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context82% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage23 / 28 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

88 Entropy
Good Token Bloat: Low
Noise Ratio: 32.7% · SNR: 2.06 · Signal: 29100 / Noise: 14108 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1389 ms
Raw HTML Size168.8 KB
Visible Text Size113.7 KB

Performance & Speed

39/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1389 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1976
DOM nodes
169 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → must-revalidate, no-cache, no-store, private
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

57/100 15 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

9
internal links
12
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ko
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 71/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for tune720.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/tune720.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=tune720.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
71
Single-page score
+19
Subpages outperform homepage
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
90
Avg across 10 pages · Range 90–90
Total Words
65550
Avg Bloat
5.3×
RAG Fractures [?]
10
⚠️
10 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 10 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://tune720.com/pricing
TUNE720 (튠720) – 초개인화 유저 데이터 분석 플랫폼
pricing 90 5.3× 6555 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://tune720.com/about
TUNE720 (튠720) – 초개인화 유저 데이터 분석 플랫폼
pricing 90 5.3× 6555 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://tune720.com/products
TUNE720 (튠720) – 초개인화 유저 데이터 분석 플랫폼
pricing 90 5.3× 6555 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://tune720.com/features
TUNE720 (튠720) – 초개인화 유저 데이터 분석 플랫폼
pricing 90 5.3× 6555 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://tune720.com/blog
TUNE720 (튠720) – 초개인화 유저 데이터 분석 플랫폼
pricing 90 5.3× 6555 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://tune720.com/docs
TUNE720 (튠720) – 초개인화 유저 데이터 분석 플랫폼
pricing 90 5.3× 6555 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://tune720.com/case-studies
TUNE720 (튠720) – 초개인화 유저 데이터 분석 플랫폼
pricing 90 5.3× 6555 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://tune720.com/integrations
TUNE720 (튠720) – 초개인화 유저 데이터 분석 플랫폼
pricing 90 5.3× 6555 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://tune720.com/contact
TUNE720 (튠720) – 초개인화 유저 데이터 분석 플랫폼
pricing 90 5.3× 6555 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://tune720.com/faq
TUNE720 (튠720) – 초개인화 유저 데이터 분석 플랫폼
pricing 90 5.3× 6555 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/integrations/ 1 90 0% 5.3× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 90 0% 5.3× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 1 90 0% 5.3× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 90 0% 5.3× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 90 0% 5.3× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 90 0% 5.3× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 90 0% 5.3× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 90 0% 5.3× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 90 0% 5.3× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 90 0% 5.3× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
mobon.net ×10
youtube.com ×10
enliple.com ×10
facebook.com ×10
notion.so ×10
blog.naver.com ×10
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/tune720.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to tune720.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
tune720.com (this site) 71 81 Custom / Proprietary 1.5× 4
kondela.hu 86 93 Custom / Proprietary 3.1× 4 Compare →
pubsandclubs.com.au 86 87 Custom / Proprietary 4.9× 4 Compare →
kruizinga.nl 87 93 Custom / Proprietary 3.0× 5 Compare →
kobekyo.com 86 94 Custom / Proprietary 3.1× 6 Compare →
hachimenroppi.com 89 88 Custom / Proprietary 2.1× 6 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history