the-board.jp 77 B
🛡️ SEO 72 🤖 GEO 90 ⚡ Perf 53 🏗️ Arch 83

the-board.jp — Global SEODiff Score 77/100

the-board.jp
📊

Registering an exceptional 94/100 on the AI-Crawler Reality Index, the-board.jp sits in the highest tier of AI extractability among indexed domains. Compared to other infrastructure sites (avg score: 57), the-board.jp performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. A tight 3.4× token bloat ratio reflects disciplined markup: minimal noise between the crawler and the content it needs. With 6 JSON-LD schema blocks, the site provides explicit machine-readable metadata that enhances AI comprehension. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

77
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (53) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Fix title tag length → +3 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 25, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than the-board.jp?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)72 × 0.25 = 18.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)90 × 0.40 = 36.0
⚡ Performance (20% weight)53 × 0.20 = 10.6
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)83 × 0.15 = 12.4
Weighted sum = 18.0 + 36.0 + 10.6 + 12.4
Global SEODiff Score = 77 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
90
Structure
avg 35
92
Schema
avg 10
70
Tech Stack
avg 64
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 45%
Rank #448833
-43 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 1%
Score 94/100

the-board.jp ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 45%) than in AI search (Top 1%). This is the 'Invisible Giant' pattern — implement the patches above to close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why the-board.jp ranks here

Tech stackRuby on Rails
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage6 blocks
Token bloat3.4×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

72/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

104 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

464 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 23
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://the-board.jp/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — board - 中小企業にちょうどいい、在庫を持たないビジネスに最適な見積書・請求書作成、販売管理クラウド
  • ✓ og:description — 【30日間無料お試し】請求書・見積書・発注書・納品書・送付状等の作成、営業管理・支払管理・売上見込の把握・キャッシュフロー予測など、中小企業の販売管理業務を一元化し経営を向上できるサービス。請求書作成ツールでは不十分だが中堅向け業務ソフトやERPだと価格が合わない企業に最適な、帳票管理が得意な販売管理クラウドです。
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

90/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, plodopitomnik-sad.ru (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
the-board.jp
80
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. plodopitomnik-sad.ru has schema coverage of 12 blocks and uses Express. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 90/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 99 elements (59 lists, 40 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words408
Raw Density24.3%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ✅ Present
Total Schema Blocks6 blocks

Schema Coverage Map

5/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
✅ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
✅ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

95
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability95/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

29%
🗑️ 71%
Useful Content (27.9 KB)Bloat (68.2 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio3.4× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage40 / 40 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

40 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 71.0% · SNR: 0.41 · Signal: 7143 / Noise: 17457 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

A local LLM (mlx-community/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-4bit) analyzed the extracted content of the-board.jp and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
クラウドで請求書・見積書作成と販売管理
Target Audience
中小企業
Pricing Model
30日間無料お試し
Model: mlx-community/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-4bit · Analyzed: 2026-02-26 · Data extracted from the site’s main content via strict JSON prompting.

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkRuby on Rails
AI-Readiness Score70/100
ServerScutum
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1405 ms
Raw HTML Size96.1 KB
Visible Text Size27.9 KB

Performance & Speed

53/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1405 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

953
DOM nodes
96 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → public, max-age=0, must-revalidate
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

83/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://the-board.jp/sitemap-index.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

99
internal links
6
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

✓ TOP 15% AI-READY

🏆 You Are AI-Verified — Claim Your Badge

Your site scores 80/100 on the AI-Crawler Reality Index. Embed this trust badge on your site — every click sends visitors to your verified report and builds backlinks to your domain.

AI-Verified badge for the-board.jp
Verified — updates automatically every 24h
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/the-board.jp" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=the-board.jp" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

How it works: The badge queries your ACRI score daily. If your score drops below 80 or your site hasn't been scanned in 30 days, the badge changes to "Pending Audit" (yellow) — prompting you to fix issues and rescan. Learn about ACRI methodology →

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to the-board.jp. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
the-board.jp (this site) 80 94 Ruby on Rails 3.4× 6
klinikaambroziak.pl 81 86 Ruby on Rails 2.1× 7 Compare →
sell.do 75 89 Ruby on Rails 3.4× 5 Compare →
symfony-project.org 73 83 Ruby on Rails 4.2× 8 Compare →
stolica-pro.ru 68 80 Ruby on Rails 3.2× 7 Compare →
zippa-auto.ru 68 80 Ruby on Rails 3.2× 7 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history