telefonica.de 51 D
🛡️ SEO 41 🤖 GEO 37 ⚡ Perf 62 🏗️ Arch 89

telefonica.de — Global SEODiff Score 51/100

telefonica.de
📊

The AI-Readiness profile for telefonica.de is strong: an ACRI of 79/100 places it ahead of 91% of domains in the index. The low ghost ratio (10%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. Heavy markup overhead (50.0× bloat) forces AI systems to wade through excess code before finding useful information. No structured data was detected, which means AI systems must infer all entities and relationships from raw HTML alone. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

51
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — AI Readiness (37) needs urgent attention.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (64×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 8 snapshots
Feb 23 Feb 26
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than telefonica.de?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)41 × 0.25 = 10.2
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)37 × 0.40 = 14.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)62 × 0.20 = 12.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)89 × 0.15 = 13.3
Weighted sum = 10.2 + 14.8 + 12.4 + 13.3
Global SEODiff Score = 51 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
97
Rendering
avg 93
100
Structure
avg 36
0
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.3%
Rank #2525
+9 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 9%
Score 79/100

telefonica.de shows stronger AI visibility than traditional SEO ranking. Great AI foundation to build on. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why telefonica.de ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
Industry
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat50×+

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

41/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

35 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

135 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✗ Has <h2> headings — found 0
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.telefonica.de/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → de
  • ✓ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Telefónica Deutschland: Startseite
  • ✓ og:description — Unternehmensportal von Telefónica in Deutschland: Presse | Nachhaltigkeit | Investor Relations | Wholesale & Partner | Karriere | News
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

37/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 10%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 100/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 37 elements (37 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words66
Raw Density56.1%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

56
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability56/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (45/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

1%
🗑️ 99%
Useful Content (841 B)Bloat (51.4 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio50×+ — Bloated

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context37% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage11 / 30 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 52.2 KB, but only 841 B is text. 1% useful / 99% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (50×+) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.
💡Only 37% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 98.4% · SNR: 0.02 · Signal: 210 / Noise: 13159 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1277 ms
Raw HTML Size52.2 KB
Visible Text Size841 B

Performance & Speed

62/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1277 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

407
DOM nodes
52 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → no-transform, max-age=300
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

89/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.telefonica.de/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

41
internal links
13
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → de
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 36/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for telefonica.de
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/telefonica.de" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=telefonica.de" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 788 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
36
Single-page score
+19
Subpages outperform homepage
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
56
Avg across 788 pages · Range 22–82
Topical Cohesion
4%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
756146
Avg Bloat
52.5×
RAG Fractures [?]
18
⚠️
18 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 18 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.telefonica.de/news/investor-relations-en/2017/05/dgap-news-telefonica-deutschland-holding-ag-preliminary-results-for-january-to-march-2017.html
DGAP-News: Telefónica Deutschland Holding AG: Preliminary results for January to March 2017
pricing 82 3.6× 3869 💰 Pricing
https://www.telefonica.de/news/investor-relations-de/2021/11/dgap-news-telefonica-deutschland-upgrade-ausblick-gj21-aufgrund-stetigen-operativen-finanziellen-momentums-1.html
DGAP-News: Telefónica Deutschland: Upgrade Ausblick GJ21 aufgrund stetigen operativen & finanziellen Momentums
pricing 82 3.9× 3892 💰 Pricing
https://www.telefonica.de/news/investor-relations-de/2021/05/dgap-news-telefonica-deutschland-holding-ag-solider-jahresauftakt-mit-profitablem-wachstum-ausblick-fuer-gj21-bestaetigt.html
DGAP-News: Telefónica Deutschland Holding AG: Solider Jahresauftakt mit profitablem Wachstum - Ausblick für GJ21 bestätigt
pricing 82 4.5× 3160 💰 Pricing
https://www.telefonica.de/news/investor-relations-en/2021/05/dgap-news-telefonica-deutschland-holding-ag-solid-start-to-the-year-with-profitable-growth-confirming-fy21-outlook.html
DGAP-News: Telefónica Deutschland Holding AG: Solid start to the year with profitable growth - confirming FY21 outlook
pricing 82 4.1× 3064 💰 Pricing
https://www.telefonica.de/news/investor-relations-en/2021/02/dgap-news-telefonica-deutschland-holding-ag-confident-fy21-outlook-on-back-of-strong-operational-and-financial-fy20-performance.html
DGAP-News: Telefónica Deutschland Holding AG: Confident FY21 outlook on back of strong operational and financial FY20 performance
pricing 82 3.3× 4355 💰 Pricing
https://www.telefonica.de/news/investor-relations-de/2020/10/dgap-news-telefonica-deutschland-holding-ag-solides-finanzergebnis-oibda-wieder-auf-wachstumskurs.html
DGAP-News: Telefónica Deutschland Holding AG: Solides Finanzergebnis - OIBDA wieder auf Wachstumskurs
other 82 4.0× 3747
https://www.telefonica.de/news/investor-relations-de/2020/07/dgap-news-telefonica-deutschland-holding-ag-geschaeftsdynamik-trotz-covid-19-intakt-sichtbare-anzeichen-von-erholung.html
DGAP-News: Telefónica Deutschland Holding AG: Geschäftsdynamik trotz COVID-19 intakt - sichtbare Anzeichen von Erholung
other 82 3.5× 4933
https://www.telefonica.de/news/investor-relations-en/2020/07/dgap-news-telefonica-deutschland-holding-ag-business-dynamics-intact-despite-covid-19-supported-by-encouraging-signs-of-recovery.html
DGAP-News: Telefónica Deutschland Holding AG: Business dynamics intact despite COVID-19 - supported by encouraging signs of recovery
pricing 82 3.1× 4698 💰 Pricing
https://www.telefonica.de/news/investor-relations-en/2020/05/dgap-news-telefonica-deutschland-holding-ag-interim-statement-january-to-march-2020.html
DGAP-News: Telefónica Deutschland Holding AG: Interim statement January to March 2020
pricing 82 3.5× 3913 💰 Pricing
https://www.telefonica.de/news/investor-relations-de/2020/02/dgap-news-telefonica-deutschland-holding-ag-vorlaeufiges-ergebnis-fuer-januar-bis-dezember-2019.html
DGAP-News: Telefónica Deutschland Holding AG: Vorläufiges Ergebnis für Januar bis Dezember 2019
pricing 82 3.3× 5256 💰 Pricing
https://www.telefonica.de/news/investor-relations-en/2019/11/dgap-news-telefonica-deutschland-holding-ag-interim-statement-for-january-to-september-2019.html
DGAP-News: Telefónica Deutschland Holding AG: Interim statement for January to September 2019
pricing 82 2.7× 6507 💰 Pricing
https://www.telefonica.de/news/investor-relations-en/2019/07/dgap-news-telefonica-deutschland-holding-ag-preliminary-results-for-january-to-june-2019.html
DGAP-News: Telefónica Deutschland Holding AG: Preliminary results for January to June 2019
pricing 82 2.6× 6419 💰 Pricing
https://www.telefonica.de/news/investor-relations-de/2019/05/dgap-news-telefonica-deutschland-holding-ag-zwischenmitteilung-fuer-januar-bis-maerz-2019.html
DGAP-News: Telefónica Deutschland Holding AG: Zwischenmitteilung für Januar bis März 2019
pricing 82 3.4× 5110 💰 Pricing
https://www.telefonica.de/news/investor-relations-en/2018/02/dgap-news-telefonica-deutschland-holding-ag-preliminary-results-for-january-to-december-2017.html
DGAP-News: Telefónica Deutschland Holding AG: Preliminary results for January to December 2017
pricing 82 2.8× 5836 💰 Pricing
https://www.telefonica.de/news/investor-relations-de/2019/02/dgap-news-telefonica-deutschland-holding-ag-vorlaeufiges-ergebnis-fuer-januar-bis-dezember-2018.html
DGAP-News: Telefónica Deutschland Holding AG: Vorläufiges Ergebnis für Januar bis Dezember 2018
pricing 82 3.0× 6828 💰 Pricing
https://www.telefonica.de/news/investor-relations-en/2019/02/dgap-news-telefonica-deutschland-holding-ag-preliminary-results-for-january-to-december-2018.html
DGAP-News: Telefónica Deutschland Holding AG: Preliminary results for January to December 2018
pricing 82 2.6× 6882 💰 Pricing
https://www.telefonica.de/news/investor-relations-de/2018/10/dgap-news-telefonica-deutschland-holding-ag-vorlaeufiges-ergebnis-fuer-januar-bis-september-2018.html
DGAP-News: Telefónica Deutschland Holding AG: Vorläufiges Ergebnis für Januar bis September 2018
pricing 82 3.3× 5521 💰 Pricing
https://www.telefonica.de/news/investor-relations-en/2018/10/dgap-news-telefonica-deutschland-holding-ag-preliminary-results-for-january-to-september-2018.html
DGAP-News: Telefónica Deutschland Holding AG: Preliminary results for January to September 2018
pricing 82 2.8× 5717 💰 Pricing
https://www.telefonica.de/news/investor-relations-de/2018/07/dgap-news-telefonica-deutschland-holding-ag-vorlaeufiges-ergebnis-fuer-januar-bis-juni-2018.html
DGAP-News: Telefónica Deutschland Holding AG: Vorläufiges Ergebnis für Januar bis Juni 2018
pricing 82 3.6× 4639 💰 Pricing
https://www.telefonica.de/news/investor-relations-en/2018/07/dgap-news-telefonica-deutschland-holding-ag-preliminary-results-for-january-to-june-2018.html
DGAP-News: Telefónica Deutschland Holding AG: Preliminary results for January to June 2018
pricing 82 3.1× 4805 💰 Pricing
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/news/ 371 66 0% 15.4× High JS Bloat
/unternehmen/ 24 63 0% 19.7× High JS Bloat
/investor-relations-en/ 13 56 0% 30.4× High JS Bloat
/investor-relations/ 10 55 0% 31.4× High JS Bloat
/nachhaltigkeit/ 10 62 0% 31.8× High JS Bloat
/partner/ 10 65 0% 16.8× High JS Bloat
/netze/ 9 59 0% 88.4× High JS Bloat
/kooperationen/ 8 52 0% 28.4× High JS Bloat
/cooperations/ 7 56 0% 24.5× High JS Bloat
/career/ 4 56 0% 36.8× High JS Bloat
/sustainability/ 4 63 0% 18.5× High JS Bloat
/company/ 4 62 0% 15.3× High JS Bloat
/network/ 4 62 0% 29.9× High JS Bloat
/partners/ 3 55 0% 27.1× High JS Bloat
/karriere/ 3 57 0% 37.3× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 788 pages
linkedin.com ×787
instagram.com ×786
ortelmobile.de ×751
o2online.de ×751
blau.de ×751
fonic.de ×751
ayyildiz.de ×751
threads.net ×721
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/telefonica.de

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to telefonica.de. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
telefonica.de (this site) 36 79 Custom / Proprietary 63.6× 0
awstats.sourceforge.io 46 65 Custom / Proprietary 3.0× 0 Compare →
gumi-cryptos.com 46 71 Custom / Proprietary 5.5× 0 Compare →
academy.sdelsol.com 46 67 Custom / Proprietary 4.9× 0 Compare →
hawkesbaynz.com 46 64 Custom / Proprietary 12.6× 0 Compare →
anket.ombudsman.gov.tr 46 65 Custom / Proprietary 3.7× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🎭

Bait & Switch Delta

B 15 PAGES

Compares your homepage rendering quality with inner pages. A high drift score means AI crawlers see a polished homepage but degraded inner content — the "bait & switch" that erodes trust.

64
Homepage ACRI
47
Inner Avg ACRI
+17
ACRI Delta
20%
Homepage Ghost
27%
Inner Avg Ghost
18
Drift Score [?]
Worst Inner Pages
46 40% pricing https://www.telefonica.de/cooperations/products/private-5g-solution.html
36 40% product https://www.telefonica.de/cooperations/products/siemens-5g-router.html
36 40% integrations https://www.telefonica.de/partner/geschaeftskundenprodukte/o2-partner-werden.html
🛡️

E-E-A-T Trust Signals

D 25/100

Trust indicators extracted from surface pages. These signals help AI systems verify your site's Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness.

Physical Address
Phone Number
Email Contact
About Page
Contact Page
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Named Leadership
🔗

Citation Profile

22 DOMAINS

Outbound citation patterns across surface-crawled pages. Sites that cite diverse, authoritative sources signal higher E-E-A-T to AI systems.

156
Total Links
22
Unique Domains
10.4
Avg/Page
14%
Diversity
instagram.com linkedin.com fonic.de o2online.de blau.de ayyildiz.de ortelmobile.de threads.net xing.com flickr.com
🏘️ Outbound Neighborhood Trust Avg Trust: 30.4

AI trust scores for the domains telefonica.de links to. Citing high-trust sources lifts your own credibility signal.

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to telefonica.de. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Telefonica",
  "url": "https://telefonica.de",
  "logo": "https://telefonica.de/static/icons/apple-touch-icon.png?v=4",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Telefonica",
  "url": "https://telefonica.de",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://telefonica.de/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 1% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for telefonica.de:

Current Score
79
Projected Score
94
Improvement
+15 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history