tappx.com 69 C
🛡️ SEO 75 🤖 GEO 81 ⚡ Perf 39 🏗️ Arch 64

tappx.com — Global SEODiff Score 69/100

tappx.com
📊

The AI-Readiness profile for tappx.com is strong: an ACRI of 76/100 places it ahead of 83% of domains in the index. Compared to other content sites (avg score: 58), tappx.com performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Content is delivered server-side, meaning bots and AI agents can parse the full page without executing JavaScript. The 5.1× token bloat ratio falls within the normal range, though there is room to trim navigation, footer, and script overhead. Structured data coverage is solid at 2 blocks, covering core entities — expanding to include FAQ or Breadcrumb schemas could strengthen the profile further. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

69
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (39) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 22 snapshots
Feb 22 Feb 26
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than tappx.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)75 × 0.25 = 18.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)81 × 0.40 = 32.4
⚡ Performance (20% weight)39 × 0.20 = 7.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)64 × 0.15 = 9.6
Weighted sum = 18.8 + 32.4 + 7.8 + 9.6
Global SEODiff Score = 69 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
30
Structure
avg 36
44
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.3%
Rank #2521
+17 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 17%
Score 76/100

tappx.com punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why tappx.com ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
Industrycontent
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage2 blocks
Token bloat5.1×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

75/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

64 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

157 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 2
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.tappx.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Cross-Platform Monetization and Programmatic Advertising | Tappx
  • ✓ og:description — Tappx is an AdTech firm that offers innovative app monetization, user acquisition, and advertising solutions for publishers, app developers, and advertisers.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

81/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the content sector, airporttaxis.com (ACRI: 77) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
tappx.com
58
Your ACRI Score
77
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. airporttaxis.com has schema coverage of 1 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 30/100 — Low
Structured Elements 60 elements (60 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words2188
Raw Density2.7%
💡Low structure score (30/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 60 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks2 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

3/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

65
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability65/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (50/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

19%
🗑️ 81%
Useful Content (66.7 KB)Bloat (273.7 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio5.1× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context3% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage3 / 94 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Only 3% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 80.4% · SNR: 0.24 · Signal: 17081 / Noise: 70055 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

A local LLM (mlx-community/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-4bit) analyzed the extracted content of tappx.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Cross-Platform Monetization and Programmatic Advertising
Target Audience
Publishers, app developers, advertisers
Pricing Model
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
📊 Content Depth
3/10
Model: mlx-community/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-4bit · Analyzed: 2026-02-27 · Data extracted from the site’s main content via strict JSON prompting.

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1039 ms
Raw HTML Size340.4 KB
Visible Text Size66.7 KB

Performance & Speed

39/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1039 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1899
DOM nodes
340 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → max-age=300, must-revalidate
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

64/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

177
internal links
33
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 58/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for tappx.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/tappx.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=tappx.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 16 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
58
Single-page score
-11
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
47
Avg across 16 pages · Range 47–47
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 58, but internal pages average only 47 — a -11-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Total Words
176
Avg Bloat
1.9×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://tappx.com/api docs 47 1.9× 11
https://tappx.com/pricing pricing 47 1.9× 11
https://tappx.com/help support 47 1.9× 11
https://tappx.com/about about 47 1.9× 11
https://tappx.com/features product 47 1.9× 11
https://tappx.com/solutions product 47 1.9× 11
https://tappx.com/products product 47 1.9× 11
https://tappx.com/docs docs 47 1.9× 11
https://tappx.com/blog blog 47 1.9× 11
https://tappx.com/case-studies social-proof 47 1.9× 11
https://tappx.com/faq support 47 1.9× 11
https://tappx.com/integrations integrations 47 1.9× 11
https://tappx.com/contact support 47 1.9× 11
https://tappx.com/careers careers 47 1.9× 11
https://tappx.com/privacy legal 47 1.9× 11
https://tappx.com/terms legal 47 1.9× 11
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/contact/ 1 47 0% 1.9× Thin Content
/help/ 1 47 0% 1.9× Thin Content
/features/ 1 47 0% 1.9× Thin Content
/docs/ 1 47 0% 1.9× Thin Content
/blog/ 1 47 0% 1.9× Thin Content
/privacy/ 1 47 0% 1.9× Thin Content
/about/ 1 47 0% 1.9× Thin Content
/terms/ 1 47 0% 1.9× Thin Content
/integrations/ 1 47 0% 1.9× Thin Content
/case-studies/ 1 47 0% 1.9× Thin Content
/pricing/ 1 47 0% 1.9× Thin Content
/solutions/ 1 47 0% 1.9× Thin Content
/careers/ 1 47 0% 1.9× Thin Content
/products/ 1 47 0% 1.9× Thin Content
/faq/ 1 47 0% 1.9× Thin Content
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/tappx.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar content Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to tappx.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
tappx.com (this site) 58 76 WordPress 5.1× 2
hertfordshirezoo.com 66 81 WordPress 3.5× 2 Compare →
blog.fantasticservices.com 72 83 WordPress 4.3× 2 Compare →
dl-zip.com 66 83 WordPress 5.7× 0 Compare →
newblog4u.bg 65 76 WordPress 7.9× 1 Compare →
bewellwigan.org 67 77 WordPress 7.0× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🎭

Bait & Switch Delta

A 15 PAGES

Compares your homepage rendering quality with inner pages. A high drift score means AI crawlers see a polished homepage but degraded inner content — the "bait & switch" that erodes trust.

47
Homepage ACRI
47
Inner Avg ACRI
0
ACRI Delta
0%
Homepage Ghost
0%
Inner Avg Ghost
0
Drift Score [?]
Worst Inner Pages
47 0% about https://tappx.com/about
47 0% product https://tappx.com/products
47 0% product https://tappx.com/features
🛡️

E-E-A-T Trust Signals

C 40/100

Trust indicators extracted from surface pages. These signals help AI systems verify your site's Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness.

Physical Address
Phone Number
Email Contact
About Page
Contact Page
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Named Leadership
🔗

Citation Profile

0 DOMAINS

Outbound citation patterns across surface-crawled pages. Sites that cite diverse, authoritative sources signal higher E-E-A-T to AI systems.

0
Total Links
0
Unique Domains
0.0
Avg/Page
0%
Diversity
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to tappx.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Tappx?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Tappx does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Tappx work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Tappx."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for tappx.com:

Current Score
76
Projected Score
82
Improvement
+6 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history