talenom.fi 66 C
🛡️ SEO 75 🤖 GEO 75 ⚡ Perf 29 🏗️ Arch 74

talenom.fi — Global SEODiff Score 66/100

talenom.fi
📊

The AI-Readiness profile for talenom.fi is strong: an ACRI of 81/100 places it ahead of 95% of domains in the index. In the finance sector, talenom.fi outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Content is delivered server-side, meaning bots and AI agents can parse the full page without executing JavaScript. The bloated 18.3× token ratio highlights an urgent need to clean up non-content markup, scripts, and navigation clutter. Minimal structured data (1 block) limits the site's ability to communicate entity relationships to AI systems. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

66
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (29) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 25, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than talenom.fi?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)75 × 0.25 = 18.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)75 × 0.40 = 30.0
⚡ Performance (20% weight)29 × 0.20 = 5.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)74 × 0.15 = 11.1
Weighted sum = 18.8 + 30.0 + 5.8 + 11.1
Global SEODiff Score = 66 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
57
Structure
avg 35
42
Schema
avg 10
85
Tech Stack
avg 64
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 50%+
Rank #591360
-54 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 5%
Score 81/100

talenom.fi ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 50%+) than in AI search (Top 5%). This is the 'Invisible Giant' pattern — implement the patches above to close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why talenom.fi ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
Industryfinance
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat18.3×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

75/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

30 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

117 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 7
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://talenom.com/fi-fi/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → fi
  • ✓ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Etusivu - Talenom tilitoimisto
  • ✓ og:description — Talenom on paitsi tilitoimisto, myös huolenpitävä ja palveleva kumppani ja neuvonantaja yrityksesi talousasioissa.
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

75/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the finance sector, unlimit.com (ACRI: 82) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
talenom.fi
64
Your ACRI Score
82
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. unlimit.com has schema coverage of 1 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 57/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 142 elements (142 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1436
Raw Density9.9%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

3/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

58
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability58/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (80/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

5%
🗑️ 95%
Useful Content (27.9 KB)Bloat (483.1 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio18.3× — Heavy

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context64% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage16 / 25 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 94.5% · SNR: 0.06 · Signal: 7130 / Noise: 123684 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time2776 ms
Raw HTML Size511.0 KB
Visible Text Size27.9 KB

Performance & Speed

29/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

2776 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1327
DOM nodes
511 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
js.hs-scripts.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

74/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

21
internal links
168
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → fi
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 64/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for talenom.fi
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/talenom.fi" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=talenom.fi" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
64
Single-page score
0
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
64
Avg across 10 pages · Range 64–64
Total Words
9070
Avg Bloat
115.4×
RAG Fractures
10
Ext. Citations
14
⚠️
10 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 10 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://talenom.fi/pricing
Etusivu - Talenom tilitoimisto
pricing 64 115.4× 907 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://talenom.fi/about
Etusivu - Talenom tilitoimisto
pricing 64 115.4× 907 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://talenom.fi/products
Etusivu - Talenom tilitoimisto
pricing 64 115.4× 907 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://talenom.fi/features
Etusivu - Talenom tilitoimisto
pricing 64 115.4× 907 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://talenom.fi/blog
Etusivu - Talenom tilitoimisto
pricing 64 115.4× 907 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://talenom.fi/docs
Etusivu - Talenom tilitoimisto
pricing 64 115.4× 907 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://talenom.fi/case-studies
Etusivu - Talenom tilitoimisto
pricing 64 115.4× 907 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://talenom.fi/contact
Etusivu - Talenom tilitoimisto
pricing 64 115.4× 907 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://talenom.fi/faq
Etusivu - Talenom tilitoimisto
pricing 64 115.4× 907 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://talenom.fi/integrations
Etusivu - Talenom tilitoimisto
pricing 64 115.4× 907 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
🔗
Outbound External Citations
14 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
online.talenom.fi ×10
instagram.com ×10
fi.linkedin.com ×10
play.google.com ×10
youtube.com ×10
twitter.com ×10
whistleblower.talenom.fi ×10
sijoittajat.talenom.fi ×10
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/talenom.fi

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar finance Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to talenom.fi. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
talenom.fi (this site) 64 81 WordPress 18.3× 1
rapyd.com 64 81 WordPress 18.1× 1 Compare →
rapyd.net 64 81 WordPress 18.1× 1 Compare →
cashdash.com 64 81 WordPress 18.1× 1 Compare →
act-on.com 63 82 WordPress 18.3× 1 Compare →
act-on.net 63 82 WordPress 18.3× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to talenom.fi. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 5% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Talenom?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Talenom does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Talenom work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Talenom."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for talenom.fi:

Current Score
81
Projected Score
89
Improvement
+8 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history