swsg.co 48 D
🛡️ SEO 30 🤖 GEO 63 ⚡ Perf 24 🏗️ Arch 68

swsg.co — Global SEODiff Score 48/100

swsg.co
📊

The AI-Readiness profile for swsg.co is strong: an ACRI of 74/100 places it ahead of 78% of domains in the index. In the infrastructure sector, swsg.co outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. The token bloat ratio sits at a lean 2.9×, meaning the ratio of code to visible content is efficient — crawlers spend their token budget on actual information. Structured data coverage is solid at 2 blocks, covering core entities — expanding to include FAQ or Breadcrumb schemas could strengthen the profile further. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

48
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Performance (24) has the most room for improvement.
🎯 Top Fix: Fix title tag length → +3 pts
⚠️ Crawl Blocked: Fetch failed (network timeout / connection error)
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 17, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 6 snapshots
Feb 24 Mar 17
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 17 Content change detected
📈 Mar 12 ACRI +1 (59→60)
Does your site score higher than swsg.co?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)30 × 0.25 = 7.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)63 × 0.40 = 25.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)24 × 0.20 = 4.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)68 × 0.15 = 10.2
Weighted sum = 7.5 + 25.2 + 4.8 + 10.2
Global SEODiff Score = 48 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
38
Structure
avg 35
44
Schema
avg 9
55
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 35%
Rank #353485
-13 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 22%
Score 74/100

swsg.co is more visible to Google than to AI models. There's room to improve AI discoverability to match your search reputation. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why swsg.co ranks here

Tech stackExpress
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage2 blocks
Token bloat2.9×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…

⚠️ Crawl Failed: Anti-Bot Protection Detected

Fetch failed (network timeout / connection error)

The scores below may not reflect actual site quality. The crawler received a challenge page instead of real content.

🛡️

Traditional SEO

30/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

120 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

315 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 19
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://swsg.co/ar/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ar
  • ✅ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — تسوق أونلاين أفضل اجهزة منزلية،كهربائية,الكترونية| الشتاء والصيف
  • ✓ og:description — وفر وقتك و تسوق اونلاين من الشتاء والصيف أفضل عروض اجهزة منزلية،كهربائية و الالكترونيات والجوالات, والتلفزيونات بأقوى عروض التخفيضات و الشحن لجميع انحاء الممكلة السعودية.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

63/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
swsg.co
34
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 38/100 — Low
Structured Elements 279 elements (279 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words6424
Raw Density4.3%
💡Low structure score (38/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 279 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks2 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

67
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability67/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (80/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

34%
🗑️ 66%
Useful Content (740.1 KB)Bloat (1405.3 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio2.9× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context9% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage87 / 945 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Only 9% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

52 Entropy
Fair Token Bloat: Medium
Noise Ratio: 65.5% · SNR: 0.53 · Signal: 189466 / Noise: 359755 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of swsg.co and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
The platform provides a comprehensive customer service solution, enabling businesses to manage customer inquiries, track orders, and streamline support operations.
Target Audience
Small to medium-sized businesses (SMBs) in e-commerce, retail, and online marketplaces; customer support managers, business owners, and operations teams.
Pricing Model
Subscription-based pricing with tiered plans based on the number of users and features, starting from a free plan and scaling up to premium plans with advanced capabilities.
🔗 Integration Partners
SlackShopifyMagento
🏆 Competitive Moat
Real-time order tracking and automated workflows combined with a user-friendly interface, offering a more efficient and integrated solution than competitors.
📊 Content Depth
5/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Integration directory pagesTemplate comparison pages
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of structured FAQ schema
• Thin landing pages for features
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-16

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkExpress
AI-Readiness Score55/100
Serverelb
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1202 ms
Raw HTML Size2145.4 KB
Visible Text Size740.1 KB

Performance & Speed

24/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1202 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

12102
DOM nodes
2145 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → max-age=0, must-revalidate, no-cache, no-store
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

68/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://swsg.co/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

1355
internal links
13
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ar
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site is currently blocking AI crawlers. Unblock them and rescan to earn your AI-Verified badge.

AI-Verified badge for swsg.co
Unverified — crawl access is blocked
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/swsg.co" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=swsg.co" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
34
Single-page score
+30
Subpages outperform homepage
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
65
Avg across 10 pages · Range 64–72
Total Words
6880
Avg Bloat
79.2×
RAG Fractures [?]
1
⚠️
1 RAG-Chunking Fracture Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 1 page will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://swsg.co/blog
المدونة
blog 72 32.9× 1960
https://swsg.co/pricing
نتائج البحث عن: 'pricing'
pricing 64 84.8× 542 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://swsg.co/about
نتائج البحث عن: 'about'
about 64 84.8× 542
https://swsg.co/products
نتائج البحث عن: 'products'
product 64 84.8× 542
https://swsg.co/features
نتائج البحث عن: 'features'
product 64 84.8× 542
https://swsg.co/docs
نتائج البحث عن: 'docs'
docs 64 84.8× 542
https://swsg.co/case-studies
نتائج البحث عن: 'case studies'
social-proof 64 84.6× 544
https://swsg.co/faq
نتائج البحث عن: 'faq'
support 64 84.8× 542
https://swsg.co/contact
منصة العميل
support 64 80.5× 582
https://swsg.co/integrations
نتائج البحث عن: 'integrations'
integrations 64 84.9× 542
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/integrations/ 1 64 0% 84.9× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 72 0% 32.9× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 64 0% 84.8× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 64 0% 84.8× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 64 0% 84.8× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 64 0% 84.8× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 64 0% 84.6× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 64 0% 80.5× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 1 64 0% 84.8× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 64 0% 84.8× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
instagram.com ×10
play.google.com ×10
youtube.com ×10
x.com ×10
facebook.com ×10
apps.apple.com ×10
snapchat.com ×10
wa.me ×10
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/swsg.co

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to swsg.co. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
swsg.co (this site) 34 74 Express 2.9× 2
pdb101.rcsb.org 59 72 Express 3.5× 0 Compare →
sub-cult.ru 59 75 Custom / Proprietary 4.4× 1 Compare →
gsus4.com.au 59 69 Next.js 2.9× 4 Compare →
wearecb.com 59 70 Custom / Proprietary 2.8× 0 Compare →
dian4d6.sbs 59 73 Cloudflare Pages 3.2× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite swsg.co when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to swsg.co. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Swsg?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Swsg does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Swsg work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Swsg."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for swsg.co:

Current Score
74
Projected Score
77
Improvement
+3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →