star-pro.ru 62 C
🛡️ SEO 35 🤖 GEO 76 ⚡ Perf 59 🏗️ Arch 76

star-pro.ru — Global SEODiff Score 62/100

star-pro.ru
📊

star-pro.ru currently sits at 61/100 on the ACRI scale, an average result that suggests several quick wins remain untapped. In the infrastructure sector, star-pro.ru outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Content is delivered server-side, meaning bots and AI agents can parse the full page without executing JavaScript. The token bloat ratio sits at a lean 2.4×, meaning the ratio of code to visible content is efficient — crawlers spend their token budget on actual information. Zero schema blocks puts this site at a disadvantage in knowledge graph and AI-answer pipelines that rely on explicit structured data. Some AI crawlers are permitted while others are blocked — a mixed robots.txt policy that limits visibility in certain AI ecosystems.

62
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (35) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add Organization + WebSite JSON-LD → +5–8 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 6 snapshots
Mar 2 Mar 21
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 21 Content change detected
📉 Mar 18 ACRI -1 (49→48)
🔄 Mar 13 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than star-pro.ru?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)35 × 0.25 = 8.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)76 × 0.40 = 30.4
⚡ Performance (20% weight)59 × 0.20 = 11.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)76 × 0.15 = 11.4
Weighted sum = 8.8 + 30.4 + 11.8 + 11.4
Global SEODiff Score = 62 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
80
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
37
Structure
avg 35
0
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 15%
Rank #148670
+37 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 51%
Score 61/100

star-pro.ru punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why star-pro.ru ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat2.4×

Fastest improvements

  • Allow ClaudeBot (many assistants rely on it) — blocking it often correlates with “AI invisibility.”
  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

35/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

100 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

368 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 23
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✗ Canonical tag present
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ru
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — СТАР – портал поиска тендеров и закупок по всей России
  • ✓ og:description — Портал для поиска тендеров и закупок по всей России «СТАР»: коммерческие и государственные закупки, поиск тендеров по всем регионам, отраслям и заказчикам; проверка истории и текущего статуса тендера.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

76/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
star-pro.ru
48
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Blocked
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed
💡ClaudeBot is blocked. To be cited by Claude, allow ClaudeBot in robots.txt.

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 37/100 — Low
Structured Elements 108 elements (108 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words2640
Raw Density4.1%
💡Low structure score (37/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 108 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

56
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
Low
Blocklist Risk
Extractability56/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (50/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskLow — 1 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

41%
🗑️ 59%
Useful Content (95.2 KB)Bloat (133.7 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio2.4× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context0% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage0 / 24 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Only 0% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

65 Entropy
Fair Token Bloat: Medium
Noise Ratio: 58.4% · SNR: 0.71 · Signal: 24378 / Noise: 34238 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of star-pro.ru and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
СТАР is a system for trading analytical solutions that helps businesses find buyers and obtain a set of online services
Target Audience
Businesses, Procurement Managers, Suppliers, Buyers, Government Agencies
Pricing Model
Subscription-based, tiered pricing with various service packages (not explicitly stated, but implied by ‘Тарифы’ - Tariffs).
🔗 Integration Partners
Getscreen
🏆 Competitive Moat
Comprehensive procurement support and analysis tools, including compliance checks and deal preparation services, tailored to Russian regulations.
📊 Content Depth
7/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
О насО платформеДокументыТарифыПоиск сделкиСервисы для поиска и анализа сделок
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Limited information on pricing structure
• Complex terminology (НМЦК, ОКПД2)
• Potential usability issues with multiple devices
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-08

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
ServerMicrosoft-IIS/10.0
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time933 ms
Raw HTML Size229.0 KB
Visible Text Size95.2 KB

Performance & Speed

59/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

933 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1385
DOM nodes
229 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

76/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://star-pro.ru/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✗ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

201
internal links
1
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ru
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 48/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for star-pro.ru
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/star-pro.ru" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=star-pro.ru" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
48
Single-page score
-43
Severe hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
6
Avg across 10 pages · Range 0–57
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 48, but internal pages average only 6 — a -43-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Total Words
400
Avg Bloat
3.7×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://star-pro.ru/about
О нас – система СТАР
about 57 36.6× 400
https://star-pro.ru/pricing pricing 0 0.0× 0
https://star-pro.ru/products product 0 0.0× 0
https://star-pro.ru/features product 0 0.0× 0
https://star-pro.ru/docs docs 0 0.0× 0
https://star-pro.ru/blog blog 0 0.0× 0
https://star-pro.ru/case-studies social-proof 0 0.0× 0
https://star-pro.ru/integrations integrations 0 0.0× 0
https://star-pro.ru/contact support 0 0.0× 0
https://star-pro.ru/faq support 0 0.0× 0
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/about/ 1 57 0% 36.6× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/blog/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/contact/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
getscreen.ru ×1
private.star-pro.ru ×1
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/star-pro.ru

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to star-pro.ru. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
star-pro.ru (this site) 48 61 Custom / Proprietary 2.4× 0
pratiche.it 73 78 Custom / Proprietary 2.3× 0 Compare →
zertek.com.tr 73 79 Custom / Proprietary 2.2× 0 Compare →
biz.ne.jp 73 80 Custom / Proprietary 4.1× 0 Compare →
bj.house.163.com 73 80 Custom / Proprietary 4.4× 0 Compare →
shopbecker.com 73 82 Custom / Proprietary 5.5× 2 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite star-pro.ru when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to star-pro.ru. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Star-pro",
  "url": "https://star-pro.ru",
  "logo": "https://star-pro.ru/assets/favicons/apple-icon-57x57.png",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Star-pro",
  "url": "https://star-pro.ru",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://star-pro.ru/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Allow ClaudeBot in robots.txt
Medium Impact ⏱ 2 min
ClaudeBot is restricted — Claude may not be able to cite your content. Many AI assistants rely on it.
text
User-agent: ClaudeBot
Allow: /

User-agent: anthropic-ai
Allow: /
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Star-pro?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Star-pro does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Star-pro work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Star-pro."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for star-pro.ru:

Current Score
61
Projected Score
79
Improvement
+18 pts
Allow ClaudeBot +5 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →