sportvision.hr 68 C
🛡️ SEO 46 🤖 GEO 88 ⚡ Perf 39 🏗️ Arch 91

sportvision.hr — Global SEODiff Score 68/100

sportvision.hr
📊

With a solid 83/100 ACRI, sportvision.hr is well-positioned for AI search — better than 97% of sites in the Radar. Within the infrastructure vertical, this places sportvision.hr above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The low ghost ratio (5%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. With a 3.3× bloat ratio, the page delivers its content without excessive boilerplate, giving AI systems a clean extraction path. The site includes 2 schema blocks, providing adequate structured data for basic entity recognition. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

68
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (39) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 28, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 16 snapshots
Feb 22 Feb 28
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than sportvision.hr?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)46 × 0.25 = 11.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)88 × 0.40 = 35.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)39 × 0.20 = 7.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)91 × 0.15 = 13.7
Weighted sum = 11.5 + 35.2 + 7.8 + 13.7
Global SEODiff Score = 68 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
84
Structure
avg 36
44
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 8%
Rank #80097
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 3%
Score 83/100

sportvision.hr has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why sportvision.hr ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage2 blocks
Token bloat3.3×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

46/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

54 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

131 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 2
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.sportvision.hr
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → hr
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Sport Vision - Trgovina sportske opreme | Sport Vision
  • ✓ og:description — Tvoja vizija sportskog uspjeha! Nike, adidas, Champion, Reebok, Umbro... Više od 40 najvećih sportskih brandova na jednom mjestu!
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

88/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, plodopitomnik-sad.ru (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
sportvision.hr
76
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. plodopitomnik-sad.ru has schema coverage of 12 blocks and uses Express. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 84/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 240 elements (240 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1143
Raw Density21.0%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks2 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

81
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability81/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (60/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

30%
🗑️ 70%
Useful Content (84.5 KB)Bloat (198.3 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio3.3× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context87% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage80 / 92 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

43 Entropy
Fair Token Bloat: Medium
Noise Ratio: 70.1% · SNR: 0.43 · Signal: 21629 / Noise: 50771 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

A local LLM (mlx-community/gemma-3-4b-it-qat-4bit) analyzed the extracted content of sportvision.hr and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Sport Vision provides a cloud-based platform for managing sprint planning and resource allocation, primarily targeting engineering and product teams, offering
Target Audience
Engineering managers, product managers, software developers, agile coaches
Pricing Model
Freemium with tiered pricing, starting from a monthly subscription (details not explicitly stated, but includes options like ‘beskamatno 2-12 rata’ – 0% interest for 2-12 installments).
🔗 Integration Partners
WebPayPayPalCorvusPayVisaMasterCardMaestroDiners
🛡️ Compliance Standards
SSL enkripcija
🏆 Competitive Moat
AI-powered sprint planning with real-time resource optimization and a focus on streamlining agile workflows.
📊 Content Depth
6/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Template comparison pages (e.g., ‘Tablicu veličine odjeće OVDJE’ and ‘Tablicu veličine obuće OVDJE’)Integration directory pages (e.g., ‘Mogu li naručiti na web shopu i preuzeti paket u trgovini?’)FAQ schema (implied through the ‘Najčešće postavljana pitanja’ section)
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of structured FAQ schema (addressed with FAQ section)
• Thin landing pages for features (implied by the detailed FAQ and product information)
• Complex payment options (multiple payment methods and installment plans)
Model: mlx-community/gemma-3-4b-it-qat-4bit · Analyzed: 2026-02-28 · Data extracted from the site’s main content via strict JSON prompting.

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
ServerCustom Server
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1089 ms
Raw HTML Size282.8 KB
Visible Text Size84.5 KB

Performance & Speed

39/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1089 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1979
DOM nodes
283 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

91/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.sportvision.hr/files/sitemap/HRK_hr/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

321
internal links
28
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → hr
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 76/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for sportvision.hr
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/sportvision.hr" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=sportvision.hr" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 47 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
76
Single-page score
-14
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
62
Avg across 47 pages · Range 54–72
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 76, but internal pages average only 62 — a -14-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Topical Cohesion
3%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
56392
Avg Bloat
69.6×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.sportvision.hr/gdpr
GDPR | Sport Vision
trust 72 18.3× 2207
https://www.sportvision.hr/cizme/
Čizme za zimu | adidas, Timberland, Columbia
pricing 69 86.9× 1892 💰 Pricing
https://www.sportvision.hr/japanke/
Japanke | Ipanema, Havaianas, Rider
pricing 69 90.9× 1768 💰 Pricing
https://www.sportvision.hr/polo-majica/
Polo majice za muškarce i žene | Nike, Champion
pricing 69 89.0× 1717 💰 Pricing
https://www.sportvision.hr/majica-s-kapuljacom/
Majice s kapuljačom | Nike, adidas, Ellesse
pricing 69 71.5× 2226 💰 Pricing
https://www.sportvision.hr/majica-s-kapuljacom-na-patent/
Majice s kapuljačom i zatvaračem
pricing 69 82.4× 1952 💰 Pricing
https://www.sportvision.hr/proizvodi/
Sportska obuća, odjeća i oprema za sve uzraste
pricing 69 87.0× 2503 💰 Pricing
https://www.sportvision.hr/oprema/
Sportska oprema za muškarce, žene i djecu
pricing 69 74.0× 2359 💰 Pricing
https://www.sportvision.hr/odjeca/
Sportska odjeća za muškarce, žene i djecu
pricing 69 77.4× 2334 💰 Pricing
https://www.sportvision.hr/obuca/
Sportska obuća za muškarce, žene i djecu
pricing 69 83.8× 2313 💰 Pricing
https://www.sportvision.hr/tenisice/
Tenisice svjetskih brendova | Nike, adidas, Skechers
pricing 69 88.1× 2144 💰 Pricing
https://www.sportvision.hr/sandale/
Udobne sandale za sve uzraste
pricing 69 105.1× 1651 💰 Pricing
https://www.sportvision.hr/natikace/
Natikače za cijelu obitelj | adidas, Nike, Lotto
pricing 69 79.8× 2436 💰 Pricing
https://www.sportvision.hr/trenirka/
Muške, Ženske i Dječje Trenirke – Nike, Adidas
pricing 69 78.1× 2018 💰 Pricing
https://www.sportvision.hr/tshirt/
Kratke majice za sve prilike i uzraste
pricing 69 83.1× 1967 💰 Pricing
https://www.sportvision.hr/majica-dugih-rukava/
Majice dugih rukava | Nike, adidas, Champion
pricing 69 85.5× 1867 💰 Pricing
https://www.sportvision.hr/majica-bez-kragne/
Sportske majice dugih rukava | adidas, Nike, Champion
pricing 69 84.9× 1860 💰 Pricing
https://sportvision.hr/faq
faq | Sport Vision
support 67 23.8× 2022
https://www.sportvision.hr/faq/korisnicka-podrska/
Korisnička podrška | Sport Vision
support 67 48.2× 838
https://www.sportvision.hr/faq/
faq | Sport Vision
support 67 23.9× 2022
Showing 20 of 47 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/faq/ 29 58 0% 62.8× High JS Bloat
/natikace/ 1 69 0% 79.8× High JS Bloat
/tshirt/ 1 69 0% 83.0× High JS Bloat
/tenisice/ 1 69 0% 88.1× High JS Bloat
/tutorial/ 1 54 0% 83.0× High JS Bloat
/cizme/ 1 69 0% 86.9× High JS Bloat
/majica-s-kapuljacom/ 1 69 0% 71.5× High JS Bloat
/majica-s-kapuljacom-na-patent/ 1 69 0% 82.4× High JS Bloat
/gdpr/ 1 72 0% 18.3× High JS Bloat
/obuca/ 1 69 0% 83.8× High JS Bloat
/japanke/ 1 69 0% 90.9× High JS Bloat
/proizvodi/ 1 69 0% 87.0× High JS Bloat
/majica-bez-kragne/ 1 69 0% 84.9× High JS Bloat
/polo-majica/ 1 69 0% 89.0× High JS Bloat
/oprema/ 1 69 0% 74.0× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 47 pages
sportvision.sk ×47
sportvision.mk ×47
accounts.google.com ×47
instagram.com ×47
sportvision.bg ×47
sportvision.cz ×47
bestbuyaward.org ×47
brand.mastercard.com ×47
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/sportvision.hr

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to sportvision.hr. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
sportvision.hr (this site) 76 83 Custom / Proprietary 3.3× 2
violinsetc.com 89 86 Custom / Proprietary 2.2× 1 Compare →
insuranceyet.com 86 87 Custom / Proprietary 4.9× 4 Compare →
kruizinga.nl 87 93 Custom / Proprietary 3.0× 5 Compare →
safescan.com 86 87 Custom / Proprietary 1.9× 5 Compare →
kobekyo.com 86 94 Custom / Proprietary 3.1× 6 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite sportvision.hr when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to sportvision.hr. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Sportvision?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Sportvision does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Sportvision work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Sportvision."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for sportvision.hr:

Current Score
83
Projected Score
86
Improvement
+3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history