scrapehero.com 70 B
🛡️ SEO 75 🤖 GEO 81 ⚡ Perf 39 🏗️ Arch 71

scrapehero.com — Global SEODiff Score 70/100

scrapehero.com
📊

The AI-Readiness profile for scrapehero.com is strong: an ACRI of 81/100 places it ahead of 95% of domains in the index. Within the social vertical, this places scrapehero.com above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The low ghost ratio (0%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. Token bloat registers at 9.9× — acceptable, but reducing inline scripts and redundant markup could yield measurable gains. Structured data coverage is solid at 2 blocks, covering core entities — expanding to include FAQ or Breadcrumb schemas could strengthen the profile further. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

70
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (39) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 24, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than scrapehero.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)75 × 0.25 = 18.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)81 × 0.40 = 32.4
⚡ Performance (20% weight)39 × 0.20 = 7.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)71 × 0.15 = 10.7
Weighted sum = 18.8 + 32.4 + 7.8 + 10.7
Global SEODiff Score = 70 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
26
Structure
avg 35
84
Schema
avg 10
85
Tech Stack
avg 64
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 11%
Rank #110484
-6 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 5%
Score 81/100

scrapehero.com is more visible to Google than to AI models. There's room to improve AI discoverability to match your search reputation. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why scrapehero.com ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
Industrysocial
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage2 blocks
Token bloat9.9×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

75/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

51 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

172 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 12
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.scrapehero.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Home
  • ✓ og:description — ScrapeHero is a web scraping services provider based in the USA. We take care of web crawling, data extraction, automated quality checks and deliver usable structured data.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

81/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the social sector, plodopitomnik-sad.by (ACRI: 89) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
scrapehero.com
59
Your ACRI Score
89
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. plodopitomnik-sad.by has schema coverage of 11 blocks and uses Express. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 26/100 — Low
Structured Elements 39 elements (39 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1859
Raw Density2.1%
💡Low structure score (26/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 39 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ✅ Present
Total Schema Blocks2 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

5/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
✅ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

64
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability64/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (50/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

10%
🗑️ 90%
Useful Content (33.4 KB)Bloat (297.1 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio9.9× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context70% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage23 / 33 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 89.9% · SNR: 0.11 · Signal: 8545 / Noise: 76045 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1118 ms
Raw HTML Size330.4 KB
Visible Text Size33.4 KB

Performance & Speed

39/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1118 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

2099
DOM nodes
330 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

71/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

60
internal links
36
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 59/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for scrapehero.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/scrapehero.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=scrapehero.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

🔗 Similar social Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to scrapehero.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
scrapehero.com (this site) 59 81 WordPress 9.9× 2
sbo.net 59 78 WordPress 9.8× 2 Compare →
seattletandems.de 59 76 WordPress 10.3× 2 Compare →
wethepeoplesa.org 60 79 WordPress 9.9× 2 Compare →
aagilenews.net 59 79 WordPress 9.4× 2 Compare →
artransport.com 59 79 WordPress 9.4× 2 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to scrapehero.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Scrapehero?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Scrapehero does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Scrapehero work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Scrapehero."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for scrapehero.com:

Current Score
81
Projected Score
87
Improvement
+6 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history