rlp.de 60 C
🛡️ SEO 25 🤖 GEO 83 ⚡ Perf 40 🏗️ Arch 86

rlp.de — Global SEODiff Score 60/100

rlp.de
📊

The AI-Readiness profile for rlp.de is strong: an ACRI of 75/100 places it ahead of 81% of domains in the index. The low ghost ratio (0%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. A 8.9× bloat ratio is typical for sites in this tech tier — not wasteful, but streamlining could further boost extractability. The complete absence of JSON-LD schema is a missed opportunity: even basic Organization markup would improve how AI crawlers understand this domain. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

60
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (25) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add Organization + WebSite JSON-LD → +5–8 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 3 snapshots
Feb 23 Feb 26
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than rlp.de?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)25 × 0.25 = 6.2
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)83 × 0.40 = 33.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)40 × 0.20 = 8.0
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)86 × 0.15 = 12.9
Weighted sum = 6.2 + 33.2 + 8.0 + 12.9
Global SEODiff Score = 60 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
71
Structure
avg 36
0
Schema
avg 9
60
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 1%
Rank #13732
+18 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 19%
Score 75/100

rlp.de punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why rlp.de ranks here

Tech stackTYPO3
Industry
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat8.9×

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

25/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

62 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

70 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 7
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → http://www.rlp.de/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → de-DE
  • ✓ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — rlp.de: Informationen über euer Land
  • ✓ og:description — Das Internetportal der Landesregierung: Miteinander gut leben!
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

83/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 71/100 — Good
Structured Elements 176 elements (176 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1167
Raw Density15.1%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

58
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability58/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

11%
🗑️ 89%
Useful Content (14.2 KB)Bloat (112.9 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio8.9× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context96% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage67 / 70 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 88.8% · SNR: 0.13 · Signal: 3648 / Noise: 28901 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkTYPO3
AI-Readiness Score60/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time2425 ms
Raw HTML Size127.1 KB
Visible Text Size14.2 KB

Performance & Speed

40/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

2425 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1127
DOM nodes
127 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

86/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

185
internal links
18
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → de-DE
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 63/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for rlp.de
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/rlp.de" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=rlp.de" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
63
Single-page score
+9
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
72
Avg across 10 pages · Range 72–72
Total Words
8220
Avg Bloat
31.7×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://rlp.de/pricing
rlp.de: Startseite . Internetportal des Landes Rheinland-Pfalz
pricing 72 31.7× 822
https://rlp.de/about
rlp.de: Startseite . Internetportal des Landes Rheinland-Pfalz
about 72 31.7× 822
https://rlp.de/products
rlp.de: Startseite . Internetportal des Landes Rheinland-Pfalz
product 72 31.7× 822
https://rlp.de/features
rlp.de: Startseite . Internetportal des Landes Rheinland-Pfalz
product 72 31.7× 822
https://rlp.de/docs
rlp.de: Startseite . Internetportal des Landes Rheinland-Pfalz
docs 72 31.7× 822
https://rlp.de/blog
rlp.de: Startseite . Internetportal des Landes Rheinland-Pfalz
blog 72 31.7× 822
https://rlp.de/case-studies
rlp.de: Startseite . Internetportal des Landes Rheinland-Pfalz
social-proof 72 31.7× 822
https://rlp.de/faq
rlp.de: Startseite . Internetportal des Landes Rheinland-Pfalz
support 72 31.7× 822
https://rlp.de/contact
rlp.de: Startseite . Internetportal des Landes Rheinland-Pfalz
support 72 31.7× 822
https://rlp.de/integrations
rlp.de: Startseite . Internetportal des Landes Rheinland-Pfalz
integrations 72 31.7× 822
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/pricing/ 1 72 0% 31.7× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 72 0% 31.7× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 72 0% 31.7× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 72 0% 31.7× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 72 0% 31.7× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 1 72 0% 31.7× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 72 0% 31.7× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 72 0% 31.7× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 72 0% 31.7× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 1 72 0% 31.7× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
instagram.com ×10
landesvertretung.rlp.de ×10
bm.rlp.de ×10
flickr.com ×10
mkuem.rlp.de ×10
kipki.rlp.de ×10
tpp.rlp.de ×10
lpb.rlp.de ×10
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/rlp.de

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to rlp.de. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
rlp.de (this site) 63 75 TYPO3 8.9× 0
ssh.springbranchisd.com 73 82 Cloudflare Pages 6.3× 0 Compare →
cta.org 73 85 WordPress 7.3× 1 Compare →
marleylilly.com 73 84 Express 9.1× 2 Compare →
rieker-eshop.sk 73 83 Custom / Proprietary 7.9× 2 Compare →
beau-coup.com 73 80 Custom / Proprietary 5.9× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🎭

Bait & Switch Delta

A 10 PAGES

Compares your homepage rendering quality with inner pages. A high drift score means AI crawlers see a polished homepage but degraded inner content — the "bait & switch" that erodes trust.

72
Homepage ACRI
72
Inner Avg ACRI
0
ACRI Delta
20%
Homepage Ghost
20%
Inner Avg Ghost
0
Drift Score [?]
Worst Inner Pages
72 20% about https://rlp.de/about
72 20% product https://rlp.de/products
72 20% product https://rlp.de/features
🛡️

E-E-A-T Trust Signals

C 40/100

Trust indicators extracted from surface pages. These signals help AI systems verify your site's Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness.

Physical Address
Phone Number
Email Contact
About Page
Contact Page
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Named Leadership
🔗

Citation Profile

27 DOMAINS

Outbound citation patterns across surface-crawled pages. Sites that cite diverse, authoritative sources signal higher E-E-A-T to AI systems.

270
Total Links
27
Unique Domains
27.0
Avg/Page
10%
Diversity
bm.rlp.de facebook.com linkedin.com mpower-rlp.de mastd.rlp.de ukraine.rlp.de schule-der-zukunft.rlp.de jm.rlp.de mkuem.rlp.de lpb.rlp.de
🏘️ Outbound Neighborhood Trust Avg Trust: 21.3

AI trust scores for the domains rlp.de links to. Citing high-trust sources lifts your own credibility signal.

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to rlp.de. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Rlp",
  "url": "https://rlp.de",
  "logo": "https://www.rlp.de/_assets/8f1d4bf2177894e726dc164a54308e02/Icons/Favicons/favicon.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Rlp",
  "url": "https://rlp.de",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://rlp.de/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Rlp?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Rlp does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Rlp work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Rlp."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for rlp.de:

Current Score
75
Projected Score
91
Improvement
+16 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history