revita.bg 61 C
🛡️ SEO 47 🤖 GEO 83 ⚡ Perf 11 🏗️ Arch 92

revita.bg — Global SEODiff Score 61/100

revita.bg
📊

revita.bg achieves a 78/100 on the AI-Crawler Reality Index, reflecting above-average readiness for AI-driven discovery. In the infrastructure sector, revita.bg outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. With a 3.0× bloat ratio, the page delivers its content without excessive boilerplate, giving AI systems a clean extraction path. Rich structured data (5 schema blocks) gives AI systems strong semantic signals for entity recognition and knowledge graph inclusion. The site allows access to some AI bots but restricts others, creating an uneven visibility profile across AI-powered services.

61
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (11) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Fix title tag length → +3 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 27, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than revita.bg?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)47 × 0.25 = 11.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)83 × 0.40 = 33.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)11 × 0.20 = 2.2
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)92 × 0.15 = 13.8
Weighted sum = 11.8 + 33.2 + 2.2 + 13.8
Global SEODiff Score = 61 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
80
Bot Access
avg 92
97
Rendering
avg 93
82
Structure
avg 36
50
Schema
avg 9
55
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 50%+
Rank #655723
-53 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 12%
Score 78/100

revita.bg ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 50%+) than in AI search (Top 12%). This is the 'Visibility Gap' pattern — implementing the recommendations above can help close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why revita.bg ranks here

Tech stackPrestaShop
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage5 blocks
Token bloat3.0×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

47/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

82 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

411 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 3
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://revita.bg/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → bg
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Билкови продукти и хранителни добавки - Revita.bg
  • ✓ og:description — Revita е вносител на реномираните и доказани световни производители на хранителни добавки и витамини - Nature's Way, Natural Factors, Webber Naturals, Phyto Wave. В нашия онлайн магазин ще намерите всичко за здравето и добрата форма на цялото семейство.[i
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

83/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
revita.bg
77
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Blocked
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 10%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 82/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 837 elements (837 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words4102
Raw Density20.4%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks5 blocks

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

81
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
Low
Blocklist Risk
Extractability81/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (80/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskLow — 1 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

33%
🗑️ 67%
Useful Content (240.4 KB)Bloat (470.3 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio3.0× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context95% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage261 / 275 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

50 Entropy
Fair Token Bloat: Medium
Noise Ratio: 66.2% · SNR: 0.51 · Signal: 61550 / Noise: 120403 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

A local LLM (mlx-community/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-4bit) analyzed the extracted content of revita.bg and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Bilki products and nutritional supplements
Target Audience
Families and individuals for health and wellness
Pricing Model
Not explicitly mentioned
Model: mlx-community/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-4bit · Analyzed: 2026-02-26 · Data extracted from the site’s main content via strict JSON prompting.

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkPrestaShop
AI-Readiness Score55/100
ServerLiteSpeed
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time4025 ms
Raw HTML Size710.8 KB
Visible Text Size240.4 KB

Performance & Speed

11/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

4025 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

5183
DOM nodes
711 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

92/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://revita.bg/sitemap_blog.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

1146
internal links
10
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → bg
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 77/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for revita.bg
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/revita.bg" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=revita.bg" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 2 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
77
Single-page score
-13
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
64
Avg across 2 pages · Range 62–67
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 77, but internal pages average only 64 — a -13-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Topical Cohesion
41%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
1770
Avg Bloat
132.5×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://revita.bg/blog
Полезни съвети и статии за здравето — Revita.bg
pricing 67 83.1× 1295 💰 Pricing
https://revita.bg/products
Brands
pricing 62 181.8× 475 💰 Pricing
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/blog/ 1 67 0% 83.1× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 62 0% 181.8× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 2 pages
instagram.com ×2
youtube.com ×2
twitter.com ×2
facebook.com ×2
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/revita.bg

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to revita.bg. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
revita.bg (this site) 77 78 PrestaShop 3.0× 5
tradeshopitalia.com 86 87 PrestaShop 2.1× 4 Compare →
sporteque.ca 87 89 PrestaShop 2.1× 10 Compare →
kruizinga.nl 87 93 Custom / Proprietary 3.0× 5 Compare →
roua.ro 86 89 Laravel 2.2× 5 Compare →
safescan.com 86 87 Custom / Proprietary 1.9× 5 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite revita.bg when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to revita.bg. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Revita?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Revita does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Revita work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Revita."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for revita.bg:

Current Score
78
Projected Score
81
Improvement
+3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history