redhat.com 64 C
🛡️ SEO 43 🤖 GEO 72 ⚡ Perf 47 🏗️ Arch 100

redhat.com — Global SEODiff Score 64/100

redhat.com
📊

The AI-Readiness profile for redhat.com is strong: an ACRI of 71/100 places it ahead of 70% of domains in the index. Within the government vertical, this places redhat.com above the industry average of 58 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Content is delivered server-side, meaning bots and AI agents can parse the full page without executing JavaScript. The 14.0× token bloat ratio falls within the normal range, though there is room to trim navigation, footer, and script overhead. Zero schema blocks puts this site at a disadvantage in knowledge graph and AI-answer pipelines that rely on explicit structured data. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

64
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (43) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add Organization + WebSite JSON-LD → +5–8 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 27, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 27 snapshots
Feb 21 Feb 27
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than redhat.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)43 × 0.25 = 10.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)72 × 0.40 = 28.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)47 × 0.20 = 9.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)100 × 0.15 = 15.0
Weighted sum = 10.8 + 28.8 + 9.4 + 15.0
Global SEODiff Score = 64 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
97
Rendering
avg 93
61
Structure
avg 36
0
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.1%
Rank #625
+30 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 30%
Score 71/100

redhat.com punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why redhat.com ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
Industrygovernment
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat14.0×

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

43/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

61 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

158 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 9
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.redhat.com/en
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — The world's open source leader
  • ✓ og:description — Red Hat is the world’s leading provider of open source solutions, using a community-powered approach to provide reliable and high-performing cloud, virtualization, storage, Linux, and middleware technologies. Red Hat also offers award-winning support, training, and consulting services. Red Hat is an S&P 500 company with more than 80 offices spanning the globe, empowering its customers’ businesses.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

72/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the government sector, lancom-systems.com (ACRI: 83) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
redhat.com
57
Your ACRI Score
83
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. lancom-systems.com has schema coverage of 1 blocks and uses TYPO3. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 10%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 61/100 — Good
Structured Elements 248 elements (248 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words2242
Raw Density11.1%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

50
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability50/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (85/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

7%
🗑️ 93%
Useful Content (88.5 KB)Bloat (1152.3 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio14.0× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage48 / 48 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 92.9% · SNR: 0.08 · Signal: 22666 / Noise: 294978 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

A local LLM (mlx-community/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-4bit) analyzed the extracted content of redhat.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Build, deploy, and monitor AI models and apps across hybrid cloud platforms.
Target Audience
Enterprise IT, developers, cloud administrators, AI practitioners
Pricing Model
Trial, online purchase, subscription
🔗 Integration Partners
Red Hat OpenShift
🛡️ Compliance Standards
ISO 27001
🏆 Competitive Moat
Trusted adviser to Fortune 500, comprehensive foundation for AI applications, consistent hybrid cloud platforms.
📊 Content Depth
7/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Product trial centerCourses and examsDocumentationHands-on labsInteractive learning experiencesTraining and certification
⚡ Key Pain Points
• No specific meta descriptions
• Thin content on category pages
• Limited use of programmatic SEO patterns
Model: mlx-community/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-4bit · Analyzed: 2026-02-27 · Data extracted from the site’s main content via strict JSON prompting.

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
ServerApache
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time811 ms
Raw HTML Size1240.8 KB
Visible Text Size88.5 KB

Performance & Speed

47/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

811 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

2967
DOM nodes
1241 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → private, no-cache, must-revalidate
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

100/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.redhat.com/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

308
internal links
5
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 57/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for redhat.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/redhat.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=redhat.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 17 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
57
Single-page score
-4
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
53
Avg across 17 pages · Range 26–56
Topical Cohesion
9%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
28420
Avg Bloat
137.3×
RAG Fractures [?]
15
⚠️
15 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 15 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://redhat.com/about
About
pricing 56 106.1× 997 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://redhat.com/products
All Red Hat products
pricing 56 59.2× 2611 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://redhat.com/features
Features and benefits of Red Hat OpenShift
pricing 56 63.9× 2376 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://redhat.com/blog
The official Red Hat blog
pricing 56 88.7× 1522 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.redhat.com/ko
Red Hat - 기업을 위한 오픈소스 기술 제공
pricing 56 134.9× 1891 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.redhat.com/ja
Red Hat - エンタープライズ向けオープンソース・テクノロジー
pricing 56 271.9× 941 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.redhat.com/es
Red Hat - Desarrollamos tecnologías de open source para tu empresa
pricing 56 86.0× 2970 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.redhat.com/zh-cn
红帽 - 我们致力于为企业提供开源技术产品
pricing 56 341.9× 744 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.redhat.com/de
Red Hat – Wir entwickeln Open Source-Technologien für Unternehmen
pricing 56 116.8× 2180 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.redhat.com/fr
Red Hat – Nous mettons des technologies Open Source à la disposition des entreprises
pricing 56 86.6× 2949 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.redhat.com/en
Red Hat - We make open source technologies for the enterprise
pricing 56 113.5× 2238 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.redhat.com/it
Tecnologie open source di livello enterprise
pricing 56 96.1× 2651 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.redhat.com/pt-br
Red Hat - Desenvolvemos tecnologias open source para empresas
pricing 56 97.2× 2620 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://redhat.com/contact
Contact Red Hat
pricing 53 102.9× 909 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://redhat.com/faq
Red Hat Customer Portal - Access to 24x7 support and knowledge
pricing 51 65.1× 321 💰 Pricing
https://www.redhat.com/zh-tw
Red Hat - We make open source technologies for the enterprise
pricing 46 403.4× 500 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://redhat.com/docs docs 26 100.0× 0
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/docs/ 1 26 0% 100.0× High JS Bloat
/ko/ 1 56 0% 134.9× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 53 1% 102.9× Bot Blocked
/it/ 1 56 0% 96.1× High JS Bloat
/zh-tw/ 1 46 0% 403.4× High JS Bloat
/es/ 1 56 0% 86.0× High JS Bloat
/zh-cn/ 1 56 0% 341.9× High JS Bloat
/de/ 1 56 0% 116.8× High JS Bloat
/fr/ 1 56 0% 86.6× High JS Bloat
/en/ 1 56 0% 113.5× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 56 0% 59.2× High JS Bloat
/ja/ 1 56 0% 271.9× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 56 0% 88.8× High JS Bloat
/pt-br/ 1 56 0% 97.2× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 1 51 1% 65.1× Bot Blocked
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/redhat.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar government Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to redhat.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
redhat.com (this site) 57 71 Custom / Proprietary 14.0× 0
enva.com 80 84 Custom / Proprietary 1.4× 2 Compare →
cbh.com 80 84 Custom / Proprietary 1.6× 3 Compare →
ardot.gov 78 90 WordPress 13.5× 1 Compare →
wwwilliams.com 78 90 WordPress 11.0× 1 Compare →
adaptiveinsights.com 78 91 Adobe Experience Manager 4.9× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🎭

Bait & Switch Delta

A 15 PAGES

Compares your homepage rendering quality with inner pages. A high drift score means AI crawlers see a polished homepage but degraded inner content — the "bait & switch" that erodes trust.

56
Homepage ACRI
53
Inner Avg ACRI
+3
ACRI Delta
40%
Homepage Ghost
43%
Inner Avg Ghost
6
Drift Score [?]
Worst Inner Pages
53 60% pricing https://redhat.com/contact
51 60% pricing https://redhat.com/faq
56 40% pricing https://www.redhat.com/fr
🛡️

E-E-A-T Trust Signals

C 40/100

Trust indicators extracted from surface pages. These signals help AI systems verify your site's Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness.

Physical Address
Phone Number
Email Contact
About Page
Contact Page
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Named Leadership
🔗

Citation Profile

21 DOMAINS

Outbound citation patterns across surface-crawled pages. Sites that cite diverse, authoritative sources signal higher E-E-A-T to AI systems.

203
Total Links
21
Unique Domains
13.5
Avg/Page
10%
Diversity
cloud.redhat.com facebook.com developers.redhat.com youtube.com linkedin.com catalog.redhat.com connect.redhat.com access.redhat.com coolstuff.redhat.com docs.redhat.com
🏘️ Outbound Neighborhood Trust Avg Trust: 29.8

AI trust scores for the domains redhat.com links to. Citing high-trust sources lifts your own credibility signal.

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to redhat.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Redhat",
  "url": "https://redhat.com",
  "logo": "https://redhat.com/favicon.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Redhat",
  "url": "https://redhat.com",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://redhat.com/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 7% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Redhat?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Redhat does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Redhat work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Redhat."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for redhat.com:

Current Score
71
Projected Score
89
Improvement
+18 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history

🧠 AI Citation Graph

How this domain is cited across the machine-readable web

1.6
AI-Trust
#1284
Global Rank
27%
Percentile
22
Inbound AI Links
15
Outbound AI Links
47
Avg Inbound ACRI
23%
Invisible Backlinks
Top AI Referrers
Domain ACRI AI-Trust Direction
angelichost.net 60 0.0 ← cites you
quarkus.io 59 0.0 ← cites you
distrowatch.com 56 0.0 ← cites you
coreos.com 55 0.0 ← cites you
openshift.com 55 0.0 ← cites you
istio.io 54 0.0 ← cites you
kernel.org 54 0.0 ← cites you
fedorahosted.org 54 0.0 ← cites you
3scale.net 53 0.0 ← cites you
cockpit-project.org 52 0.0 ← cites you
View Full AI-Trust Leaderboard →