qcmtech.com 65 C
🛡️ SEO 54 🤖 GEO 80 ⚡ Perf 39 🏗️ Arch 80

qcmtech.com — Global SEODiff Score 65/100

qcmtech.com
📊

At 79/100, the ACRI for qcmtech.com indicates strong fundamentals in AI extractability, surpassing the majority of indexed sites. In the government sector, qcmtech.com outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. While the majority of content is server-rendered, the 30% ghost ratio suggests some content remains invisible to static crawlers. A 9.4× bloat ratio is typical for sites in this tech tier — not wasteful, but streamlining could further boost extractability. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

65
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (39) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than qcmtech.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)54 × 0.25 = 13.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)80 × 0.40 = 32.0
⚡ Performance (20% weight)39 × 0.20 = 7.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)80 × 0.15 = 12.0
Weighted sum = 13.5 + 32.0 + 7.8 + 12.0
Global SEODiff Score = 65 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
84
Rendering
avg 93
79
Structure
avg 35
42
Schema
avg 10
55
Tech Stack
avg 64
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 50%+
Rank #848498
-75 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 9%
Score 79/100

qcmtech.com ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 50%+) than in AI search (Top 9%). This is the 'Invisible Giant' pattern — implement the patches above to close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why qcmtech.com ranks here

Tech stackVue.js
Industrygovernment
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat9.4×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

54/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

55 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

140 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 36
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://qcmtech.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — QCM Technologies - Business IT for 23+ Years in Arizona
  • ✓ og:description — Providing the best Managed Services for our SMB customers to help them succeed, grow, and capitalize on the ROI achieved with our solutions.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

80/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the government sector, gep.com (ACRI: 83) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
qcmtech.com
68
Your ACRI Score
83
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. gep.com has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses Drupal. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

👻
Shadow Content Detected: 30% of your page token budget is trapped in non-rendered regions (JavaScript-dependent content invisible to AI crawlers). Combined with 9.4x token bloat, AI models are using most of their context window on noise instead of your real content. This dramatically increases hallucination probability — models fill the gap with made-up facts.
Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 30%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 79/100 — Good
Structured Elements 206 elements (206 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1097
Raw Density18.8%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

3/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

66
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability66/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (50/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

10%
🗑️ 90%
Useful Content (28.3 KB)Bloat (237.5 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio9.4× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context85% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage11 / 13 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 89.4% · SNR: 0.12 · Signal: 7235 / Noise: 60798 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkVue.js
AI-Readiness Score55/100
Servernginx/1.25.5
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1001 ms
Raw HTML Size265.8 KB
Visible Text Size28.3 KB

Performance & Speed

39/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1001 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1824
DOM nodes
266 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

3
tracker scripts
2
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.comgoogle-analytics
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

80/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://qcmtech.com/sitemap_index.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

206
internal links
10
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 68/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for qcmtech.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/qcmtech.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=qcmtech.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
68
Single-page score
-34
Severe hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
34
Avg across 10 pages · Range 34–34
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 68, but internal pages average only 34 — a -34-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Total Words
1820
Avg Bloat
19.9×
Ext. Citations
1
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://qcmtech.com/pricing
Your access to this site has been limited by the site owner
pricing 34 19.9× 182
https://qcmtech.com/about
Your access to this site has been limited by the site owner
about 34 19.9× 182
https://qcmtech.com/products
Your access to this site has been limited by the site owner
product 34 19.9× 182
https://qcmtech.com/features
Your access to this site has been limited by the site owner
product 34 19.9× 182
https://qcmtech.com/blog
Your access to this site has been limited by the site owner
blog 34 19.9× 182
https://qcmtech.com/docs
Your access to this site has been limited by the site owner
docs 34 19.9× 182
https://qcmtech.com/case-studies
Your access to this site has been limited by the site owner
social-proof 34 19.9× 182
https://qcmtech.com/contact
Your access to this site has been limited by the site owner
support 34 19.9× 182
https://qcmtech.com/faq
Your access to this site has been limited by the site owner
support 34 19.9× 182
https://qcmtech.com/integrations
Your access to this site has been limited by the site owner
integrations 34 19.9× 182
🔗
Outbound External Citations
1 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
wordfence.com ×10
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/qcmtech.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar government Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to qcmtech.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
qcmtech.com (this site) 68 79 Vue.js 9.4× 1
manektech.com 55 73 Vue.js 10.9× 1 Compare →
phila.gov 56 73 Vue.js 3.4× 0 Compare →
meteo.gc.ca 46 65 Vue.js 14.0× 0 Compare →
weather.gc.ca 47 66 Vue.js 16.5× 0 Compare →
ninemsn.com.au 52 69 Vue.js 148.9× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to qcmtech.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Qcmtech?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Qcmtech does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Qcmtech work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Qcmtech."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for qcmtech.com:

Current Score
79
Projected Score
85
Improvement
+6 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history