powerreviews.com 68 C
🛡️ SEO 67 🤖 GEO 76 ⚡ Perf 47 🏗️ Arch 79

powerreviews.com — Global SEODiff Score 68/100

powerreviews.com
📊

At 84/100, the ACRI for powerreviews.com indicates strong fundamentals in AI extractability, surpassing the majority of indexed sites. In the developer sector, powerreviews.com outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The low ghost ratio (0%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. Token bloat registers at 13.6× — acceptable, but reducing inline scripts and redundant markup could yield measurable gains. Structured data coverage is solid at 2 blocks, covering core entities — expanding to include FAQ or Breadcrumb schemas could strengthen the profile further. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

68
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (47) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than powerreviews.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)67 × 0.25 = 16.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)76 × 0.40 = 30.4
⚡ Performance (20% weight)47 × 0.20 = 9.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)79 × 0.15 = 11.8
Weighted sum = 16.8 + 30.4 + 9.4 + 11.8
Global SEODiff Score = 68 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
68
Structure
avg 35
44
Schema
avg 10
85
Tech Stack
avg 64
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.7%
Rank #6585
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 2%
Score 84/100

powerreviews.com has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why powerreviews.com ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
Industrydeveloper
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage2 blocks
Token bloat13.6×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

67/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

55 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

145 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 13
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.powerreviews.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — PowerReviews: Doing More with UGC to Grow Your Business
  • ✓ og:description — Collect more and better Ratings & Reviews and other UGC. Create UGC displays that convert. Analyze to enhance product experience and positioning.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

76/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the developer sector, hikkoshizamurai.jp (ACRI: 88) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
powerreviews.com
66
Your ACRI Score
88
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. hikkoshizamurai.jp has schema coverage of 5 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 68/100 — Good
Structured Elements 126 elements (118 lists, 5 rows, 3 headers)
Total Words916
Raw Density13.8%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks2 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

64
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability64/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (50/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

7%
🗑️ 93%
Useful Content (17.8 KB)Bloat (225.0 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio13.6× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context77% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage57 / 74 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 92.7% · SNR: 0.08 · Signal: 4560 / Noise: 57596 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time1198 ms
Raw HTML Size242.8 KB
Visible Text Size17.8 KB

Performance & Speed

47/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1198 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1483
DOM nodes
243 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → max-age=600, must-revalidate
  • ✓ CDN cache status → DYNAMIC
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
js.hs-scripts.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

79/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → http://www.powerreviews.com/sitemap_index.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

145
internal links
8
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 66/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for powerreviews.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/powerreviews.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=powerreviews.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 16 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
66
Single-page score
-8
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
58
Avg across 16 pages · Range 31–69
Topical Cohesion
12%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
10109
Avg Bloat
101.6×
Ext. Citations
11
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.powerreviews.com/products/ratings-reviews/
Ratings & Reviews - PowerReviews
pricing 69 41.8× 1164 💰 Pricing
https://www.powerreviews.com/about/careers/
Life At Syndigo - Careers
about 67 30.0× 1039
https://www.powerreviews.com/products/store-experience-feedback/
Store Experience Feedback - PowerReviews
product 67 24.5× 1355
https://www.powerreviews.com/the-role-of-visual-content-and-how-to-leverage-it/
The Importance of Visual Content and How to Leverage It
other 67 30.5× 860
https://www.powerreviews.com/powerreviews-and-gdpr-compliance/
PowerReviews and GDPR Compliance - PowerReviews
trust 67 22.1× 1196
https://www.powerreviews.com/products/product-sampling/
Product Sampling - PowerReviews
pricing 64 39.4× 857 💰 Pricing
https://www.powerreviews.com/products/ratings-reviews/powersocial/
PowerSocial - PowerReviews
pricing 64 43.3× 812 💰 Pricing
https://www.powerreviews.com/solutions/
Products - PowerReviews
product 64 67.9× 502
https://www.powerreviews.com/resources/
Customer Engagement Resources Library | PowerReviews
blog 56 112.6× 330
https://www.powerreviews.com/about/
About | PowerReviews
about 54 103.8× 298
https://www.powerreviews.com/products/community-engagement/
Community Engagement - PowerReviews
product 54 68.6× 421
https://www.powerreviews.com/solutions/ugc-syndication/
UGC Syndication - PowerReviews
product 54 109.4× 343
https://www.powerreviews.com/integrations/
Partnerships and Integrations - PowerReviews
pricing 54 132.0× 231 💰 Pricing
https://www.powerreviews.com/the-importance-of-size-and-fit-information-for-reducing-apparel-returns/
The Importance of Fit Information in Reviews for Reducing Apparel Returns
other 54 52.1× 493
https://www.powerreviews.com/northwestern-study-self-motivated-versus-prompted-reviews/
Northwestern & PowerReviews Guide Vol. 2: Who Writes Reviews
other 44 154.2× 162
https://www.powerreviews.com/demo/
Request a Demo | PowerReviews
conversion 31 593.2× 46
🔗
Outbound External Citations
11 unique external domains cited across 16 pages
status.powerreviews.com ×15
facebook.com ×15
linkedin.com ×15
vimeo.com ×15
twitter.com ×15
auth.powerreviews.com ×15
syndigo.partner-experience.com ×1
syndigo.com ×1
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/powerreviews.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar developer Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to powerreviews.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
powerreviews.com (this site) 66 84 WordPress 13.6× 2
mauioceancenter.com 66 82 WordPress 13.1× 2 Compare →
mediotejo.net 66 82 WordPress 14.2× 2 Compare →
emizentech.com 65 88 WordPress 13.7× 2 Compare →
soccernews.nl 67 82 WordPress 13.8× 2 Compare →
hesperia.com 67 82 WordPress 13.4× 2 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to powerreviews.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 7% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Powerreviews?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Powerreviews does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Powerreviews work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Powerreviews."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for powerreviews.com:

Current Score
84
Projected Score
92
Improvement
+8 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history