plottermarie.de 61 C
🛡️ SEO 32 🤖 GEO 88 ⚡ Perf 47 🏗️ Arch 59

plottermarie.de — Global SEODiff Score 61/100

plottermarie.de
📊

plottermarie.de demonstrates elite AI-Readiness, achieving an ACRI of 87/100 — placing it in the top 99% of all indexed domains. Within the infrastructure vertical, this places plottermarie.de above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. The token bloat ratio sits at a lean 2.8×, meaning the ratio of code to visible content is efficient — crawlers spend their token budget on actual information. The site includes 2 schema blocks, providing adequate structured data for basic entity recognition. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

61
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (32) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 25, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than plottermarie.de?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)32 × 0.25 = 8.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)88 × 0.40 = 35.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)47 × 0.20 = 9.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)59 × 0.15 = 8.8
Weighted sum = 8.0 + 35.2 + 9.4 + 8.8
Global SEODiff Score = 61 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
100
Structure
avg 35
44
Schema
avg 10
55
Tech Stack
avg 64
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 50%+
Rank #907483
-89 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 1%
Score 87/100

plottermarie.de ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 50%+) than in AI search (Top 1%). This is the 'Invisible Giant' pattern — implement the patches above to close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why plottermarie.de ranks here

Tech stackExpress
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage2 blocks
Token bloat2.8×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

32/100 25 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

📝 Title Tag

12 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

175 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 1
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✗ Canonical tag present
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → de
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✗ og:title
  • ✗ og:description
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

88/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
plottermarie.de
76
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 100/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 267 elements (267 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words627
Raw Density42.6%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks2 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

86
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability86/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (50/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

35%
🗑️ 65%
Useful Content (81.5 KB)Bloat (143.7 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio2.8× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context34% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage16 / 47 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Only 34% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

55 Entropy
Fair Token Bloat: Medium
Noise Ratio: 63.8% · SNR: 0.57 · Signal: 20869 / Noise: 36799 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

A local LLM (mlx-community/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-4bit) analyzed the extracted content of plottermarie.de and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Printing materials and services
Target Audience
Creative professionals and businesses
Pricing Model
Not specified
Model: mlx-community/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-4bit · Analyzed: 2026-02-26 · Data extracted from the site’s main content via strict JSON prompting.

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkExpress
AI-Readiness Score55/100
Servernginx/1.24.0
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1846 ms
Raw HTML Size225.3 KB
Visible Text Size81.5 KB

Performance & Speed

47/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1846 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1383
DOM nodes
225 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate, max-age=0
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

2
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

59/100 15 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

292
internal links
10
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → de
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 76/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for plottermarie.de
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/plottermarie.de" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=plottermarie.de" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
76
Single-page score
-36
Severe hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
40
Avg across 10 pages · Range 34–59
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 76, but internal pages average only 40 — a -36-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Topical Cohesion
1%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
1055
Avg Bloat
1036.3×
Ext. Citations
6
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://plottermarie.de/case-studies
Canvas case Accessoires Beutel
pricing 59 209.4× 311 💰 Pricing
https://plottermarie.de/blog
Blog
blog 54 110.2× 440
https://plottermarie.de/features
Suchergebnisse für: "features"
pricing 49 423.8× 103 💰 Pricing
https://plottermarie.de/pricing
Suchergebnisse für: "pricing"
pricing 34 1348.1× 29 💰 Pricing
https://plottermarie.de/about
Suchergebnisse für: "about"
about 34 1348.0× 29
https://plottermarie.de/products
Suchergebnisse für: "products"
product 34 1348.2× 29
https://plottermarie.de/docs
Suchergebnisse für: "docs"
docs 34 1347.9× 29
https://plottermarie.de/contact
Kontaktieren Sie uns
support 34 1184.2× 33
https://plottermarie.de/integrations
Suchergebnisse für: "integrations"
integrations 34 1348.4× 29
https://plottermarie.de/faq
FAQ
support 34 1694.4× 23
🔗
Outbound External Citations
6 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
instagram.com ×10
ticket.stahls.de ×10
transfer.plottermarie.de ×10
youtube.com ×10
business.trustedshops.de ×10
facebook.com ×10
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/plottermarie.de

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to plottermarie.de. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
plottermarie.de (this site) 76 87 Express 2.8× 2
ortobom.com.br 76 84 Express 2.9× 2 Compare →
minidorp.nl 76 80 Express 2.9× 2 Compare →
gmrgroup.in 76 84 Express 3.0× 2 Compare →
wir-machen-druck.de 76 83 Express 2.6× 2 Compare →
kasanova.com 76 78 Express 3.0× 2 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to plottermarie.de. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Plottermarie?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Plottermarie does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Plottermarie work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Plottermarie."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for plottermarie.de:

Current Score
87
Projected Score
90
Improvement
+3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history