pialadunia.app 61 C
🛡️ SEO 62 🤖 GEO 87 ⚡ Perf 11 🏗️ Arch 55

pialadunia.app — Global SEODiff Score 61/100

pialadunia.app
📊

pialadunia.app shows strong AI visibility with an ACRI of 83/100, outperforming 97% of indexed domains. Compared to other infrastructure sites (avg score: 57), pialadunia.app performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The low ghost ratio (5%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. A tight 2.9× token bloat ratio reflects disciplined markup: minimal noise between the crawler and the content it needs. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

61
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (11) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 25, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than pialadunia.app?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)62 × 0.25 = 15.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)87 × 0.40 = 34.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)11 × 0.20 = 2.2
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)55 × 0.15 = 8.2
Weighted sum = 15.5 + 34.8 + 2.2 + 8.2
Global SEODiff Score = 61 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
72
Structure
avg 35
42
Schema
avg 10
75
Tech Stack
avg 64
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 50%+
Rank #883539
-85 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 3%
Score 83/100

pialadunia.app ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 50%+) than in AI search (Top 3%). This is the 'Invisible Giant' pattern — implement the patches above to close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why pialadunia.app ranks here

Tech stackCloudflare Pages
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat2.9×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

62/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

67 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

183 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 7
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://elkriverinnandrestaurant.com/amenities/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → id-ID
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Indokasino IDKS – Situs Slot Gacor & Taruhan Bola Resmi Indonesia
  • ✓ og:description — Indokasino IDKS menyediakan taruhan bola liga dunia dan slot online gacor dalam satu akun. Akses cepat lewat link alternatif, transaksi aman, RTP tinggi, serta layanan 24 jam nonstop.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

87/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
pialadunia.app
73
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 72/100 — Good
Structured Elements 335 elements (335 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words2182
Raw Density15.4%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

77
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability77/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (70/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

34%
🗑️ 66%
Useful Content (240.3 KB)Bloat (446.4 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio2.9× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage698 / 699 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

52 Entropy
Fair Token Bloat: Medium
Noise Ratio: 65.0% · SNR: 0.54 · Signal: 61522 / Noise: 114268 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score75/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time2530 ms
Raw HTML Size686.7 KB
Visible Text Size240.3 KB

Performance & Speed

11/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

2530 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

5469
DOM nodes
687 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✓ CDN cache status → DYNAMIC
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

55/100 15 % of Global Score 🔴 Low Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

0
internal links
484
external links
Very few internal links — crawlers may miss important pages

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → id-ID
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 73/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for pialadunia.app
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/pialadunia.app" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=pialadunia.app" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
73
Single-page score
-9
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
64
Avg across 10 pages · Range 64–64
Total Words
13930
Avg Bloat
101.0×
Ext. Citations
9
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://pialadunia.app/pricing
Indokasino IDKS – Situs Slot Gacor & Taruhan Bola Resmi Indonesia
pricing 64 101.0× 1393
https://pialadunia.app/about
Indokasino IDKS – Situs Slot Gacor & Taruhan Bola Resmi Indonesia
about 64 101.0× 1393
https://pialadunia.app/features
Indokasino IDKS – Situs Slot Gacor & Taruhan Bola Resmi Indonesia
product 64 101.0× 1393
https://pialadunia.app/products
Indokasino IDKS – Situs Slot Gacor & Taruhan Bola Resmi Indonesia
product 64 101.0× 1393
https://pialadunia.app/docs
Indokasino IDKS – Situs Slot Gacor & Taruhan Bola Resmi Indonesia
docs 64 101.0× 1393
https://pialadunia.app/blog
Indokasino IDKS – Situs Slot Gacor & Taruhan Bola Resmi Indonesia
blog 64 101.0× 1393
https://pialadunia.app/case-studies
Indokasino IDKS – Situs Slot Gacor & Taruhan Bola Resmi Indonesia
social-proof 64 101.0× 1393
https://pialadunia.app/faq
Indokasino IDKS – Situs Slot Gacor & Taruhan Bola Resmi Indonesia
support 64 101.0× 1393
https://pialadunia.app/contact
Indokasino IDKS – Situs Slot Gacor & Taruhan Bola Resmi Indonesia
support 64 101.0× 1393
https://pialadunia.app/integrations
Indokasino IDKS – Situs Slot Gacor & Taruhan Bola Resmi Indonesia
integrations 64 101.0× 1393
🔗
Outbound External Citations
9 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
klik.fun ×10
instagram.com ×10
secure.livechatinc.com ×10
vingaming.com ×10
t.me ×10
apk-bank.s3.ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com ×10
facebook.com ×10
elkriverinnandrestaurant.com ×10
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/pialadunia.app

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to pialadunia.app. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
pialadunia.app (this site) 73 83 Cloudflare Pages 2.9× 1
indokasino.com 73 83 Cloudflare Pages 2.9× 1 Compare →
hstvx.com 73 83 Cloudflare Pages 2.9× 1 Compare →
rebelelectro.com 73 81 Cloudflare Pages 3.0× 1 Compare →
18mh.net 73 79 Cloudflare Pages 3.0× 1 Compare →
pharmaspot.gr 73 79 Cloudflare Pages 2.8× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to pialadunia.app. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Pialadunia?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Pialadunia does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Pialadunia work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Pialadunia."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for pialadunia.app:

Current Score
83
Projected Score
86
Improvement
+3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history