phynd.com 56 D
🛡️ SEO 57 🤖 GEO 66 ⚡ Perf 27 🏗️ Arch 64

phynd.com — Global SEODiff Score 56/100

phynd.com
📊

At 73/100, the ACRI for phynd.com indicates strong fundamentals in AI extractability, surpassing the majority of indexed sites. Within the healthcare vertical, this places phynd.com above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Content is delivered server-side, meaning bots and AI agents can parse the full page without executing JavaScript. The bloated 20.8× token ratio highlights an urgent need to clean up non-content markup, scripts, and navigation clutter. Structured data coverage is solid at 2 blocks, covering core entities — expanding to include FAQ or Breadcrumb schemas could strengthen the profile further. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

56
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Performance (27) has the most room for improvement.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (21×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 19, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 7 snapshots
Feb 23 Mar 19
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
📈 Mar 19 ACRI +4 (54→58)
🔄 Mar 14 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than phynd.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)57 × 0.25 = 14.2
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)66 × 0.40 = 26.4
⚡ Performance (20% weight)27 × 0.20 = 5.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)64 × 0.15 = 9.6
Weighted sum = 14.2 + 26.4 + 5.4 + 9.6
Global SEODiff Score = 56 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
45
Structure
avg 35
4
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 46%
Rank #464419
-21 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 25%
Score 73/100

phynd.com ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 46%) than in AI search (Top 25%). This is the 'Visibility Gap' pattern — implementing the recommendations above can help close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why phynd.com ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
Industryhealthcare
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage2 blocks
Token bloat20.8×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

57/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

38 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

137 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 2
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 12
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.symplr.com/products/symplr-directory
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Healthcare Digital Front Door | symplr
  • ✓ og:description — Provider directory software that centralizes provider data to enhance patient access through your digital front door. Get a consultation!
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

66/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the healthcare sector, adwordsguide.com (ACRI: 86) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
phynd.com
58
Your ACRI Score
86
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. adwordsguide.com has schema coverage of 4 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 45/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 145 elements (145 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words2425
Raw Density6.0%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks2 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
✅ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

44
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability44/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (60/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

4%
🗑️ 96%
Useful Content (19.9 KB)Bloat (394.5 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio20.8× — Heavy

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context66% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage23 / 35 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 414.4 KB, but only 19.9 KB is text. 4% useful / 96% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (20.8×) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 95.2% · SNR: 0.05 · Signal: 5101 / Noise: 100993 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of phynd.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Symplr Directory is a digital front door solution for healthcare organizations, centralizing provider data to improve network retention, streamline internal
Target Audience
Payers, Health Systems, Provider Enrollment Specialists, Clinical Staff, IT Professionals
Pricing Model
Custom pricing based on organization size and needs; offers a turnkey web app and a fully configurable API.
🔗 Integration Partners
EpicEHRCRM
🛡️ Compliance Standards
SOC 2CMSNCQA
🏆 Competitive Moat
AI-powered data curation and a comprehensive suite of provider management tools, including a national provider network and clinical taxonomy, create a strong competitive advantage.
📊 Content Depth
9/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Directory comparison pagesIntegration directory pagesProvider search web appProvider search API
⚡ Key Pain Points
• No structured FAQ schema
• Thin landing pages for features
• Inaccurate provider data
• Delayed reimbursements
• Audit risk
• Member leakage
• Siloed systems
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-22

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time2142 ms
Raw HTML Size414.4 KB
Visible Text Size19.9 KB

Performance & Speed

27/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

2142 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

2776
DOM nodes
414 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

64/100 15 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

176
internal links
53
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 58/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for phynd.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/phynd.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=phynd.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
58
Single-page score
+6
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
64
Avg across 10 pages · Range 64–64
Total Words
13600
Avg Bloat
54.6×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://phynd.com/pricing
Healthcare Digital Front Door | symplr
pricing 64 54.6× 1360 💰 Pricing
https://phynd.com/about
Healthcare Digital Front Door | symplr
pricing 64 54.6× 1360 💰 Pricing
https://phynd.com/products
Healthcare Digital Front Door | symplr
pricing 64 54.6× 1360 💰 Pricing
https://phynd.com/features
Healthcare Digital Front Door | symplr
pricing 64 54.6× 1360 💰 Pricing
https://phynd.com/docs
Healthcare Digital Front Door | symplr
pricing 64 54.6× 1360 💰 Pricing
https://phynd.com/blog
Healthcare Digital Front Door | symplr
pricing 64 54.6× 1360 💰 Pricing
https://phynd.com/case-studies
Healthcare Digital Front Door | symplr
pricing 64 54.6× 1360 💰 Pricing
https://phynd.com/contact
Healthcare Digital Front Door | symplr
pricing 64 54.6× 1360 💰 Pricing
https://phynd.com/faq
Healthcare Digital Front Door | symplr
pricing 64 54.6× 1360 💰 Pricing
https://phynd.com/integrations
Healthcare Digital Front Door | symplr
pricing 64 54.6× 1360 💰 Pricing
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/faq/ 1 64 0% 54.6× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 64 0% 54.6× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 64 0% 54.6× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 1 64 0% 54.6× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 64 0% 54.6× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 64 0% 54.6× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 64 0% 54.6× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 64 0% 54.6× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 64 0% 54.6× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 64 0% 54.6× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
instagram.com ×10
youtube.com ×10
twitter.com ×10
symplr.com ×10
facebook.com ×10
linkedin.com ×10
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/phynd.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar healthcare Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to phynd.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
phynd.com (this site) 58 73 WordPress 20.8× 2
trinityhealth.org 82 90 WordPress 6.0× 2 Compare →
aboutdirectorofnursingjobs.com 80 90 WordPress 5.8× 3 Compare →
volunteerforever.com 80 88 WordPress 4.8× 1 Compare →
cite4me.org 80 87 WordPress 2.0× 3 Compare →
fullhires.com 81 90 WordPress 3.4× 3 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite phynd.com when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to phynd.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Phynd",
  "url": "https://phynd.com",
  "logo": "https://www.symplr.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/symplr-favicon-150x150.png",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Phynd",
  "url": "https://phynd.com",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://phynd.com/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 4% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for phynd.com:

Current Score
73
Projected Score
88
Improvement
+15 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →