oideyasuane.com 73 B
🛡️ SEO 58 🤖 GEO 77 ⚡ Perf 80 🏗️ Arch 76

oideyasuane.com — Global SEODiff Score 73/100

oideyasuane.com
📊

oideyasuane.com demonstrates elite AI-Readiness, achieving an ACRI of 85/100 — placing it in the top 98% of all indexed domains. Within the infrastructure vertical, this places oideyasuane.com above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. A tight 2.5× token bloat ratio reflects disciplined markup: minimal noise between the crawler and the content it needs. Minimal structured data (1 block) limits the site's ability to communicate entity relationships to AI systems. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

73
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (58) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 7 snapshots
Feb 23 Mar 21
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than oideyasuane.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)58 × 0.25 = 14.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)77 × 0.40 = 30.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)80 × 0.20 = 16.0
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)76 × 0.15 = 11.4
Weighted sum = 14.5 + 30.8 + 16.0 + 11.4
Global SEODiff Score = 73 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
94
Structure
avg 35
42
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 50%+
Rank #799828
-77 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 2%
Score 85/100

oideyasuane.com ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 50%+) than in AI search (Top 2%). This is the 'Visibility Gap' pattern — implementing the recommendations above can help close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why oideyasuane.com ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat2.5×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

58/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

27 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

90 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 1
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.oideyasuane.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — お姉京都 川崎堀之内ソープランド
  • ✓ og:description — ~今どきお姉さん系女子~ 川崎の綺麗な美人専門店ソープランド
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

77/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
oideyasuane.com
65
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 94/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 47 elements (47 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words177
Raw Density26.5%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

1/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

83
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability83/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (10/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

40%
🗑️ 60%
Useful Content (16.8 KB)Bloat (26.1 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio2.5× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context98% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage43 / 44 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

62 Entropy
Fair Token Bloat: Medium
Noise Ratio: 60.8% · SNR: 0.65 · Signal: 4310 / Noise: 6673 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of oideyasuane.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
This website offers a service providing intimate companionship with a variety of female performers specializing in cosplay and themed attire,
Target Audience
Men seeking companionship, romantic experiences, and a variety of themed interactions with female performers; individuals looking for flexible scheduling and diverse options.
Pricing Model
Variable pricing based on time duration (45-120 minutes), with additional costs for optional items like costumes and accessories.
🏆 Competitive Moat
Unique selection of diverse performers with specialized skills (cosplay, body types), extensive costume options, flexible scheduling, and a comprehensive content library (photo diaries, videos, rankings) to aid in selection.
📊 Content Depth
3/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
RankingsPhoto diariesVideo content
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of transparency regarding performer details beyond basic descriptions
• Limited information on performer personalities and backgrounds
• Potential for misleading marketing due to suggestive content
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-04-06

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
ServerApache/2.4.54 ()
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time749 ms
Raw HTML Size42.9 KB
Visible Text Size16.8 KB

Performance & Speed

80/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

749 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

402
DOM nodes
43 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate, post-check=0, pre-check=0
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

76/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.oideyasuane.com/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

35
internal links
51
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 65/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for oideyasuane.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/oideyasuane.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=oideyasuane.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
65
Single-page score
-14
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
52
Avg across 10 pages · Range 50–67
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 65, but internal pages average only 52 — a -14-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Total Words
1424
Avg Bloat
105.1×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://oideyasuane.com/blog
写メ日記|川崎堀之内ソープランド お姉京都
blog 67 33.7× 719
https://oideyasuane.com/pricing
川崎ソープお姉京都
pricing 50 117.6× 75
https://oideyasuane.com/about
川崎ソープお姉京都
about 50 117.6× 75
https://oideyasuane.com/products
川崎ソープお姉京都
product 50 117.6× 75
https://oideyasuane.com/features
川崎ソープお姉京都
product 50 117.6× 75
https://oideyasuane.com/docs
川崎ソープお姉京都
docs 50 117.6× 75
https://oideyasuane.com/case-studies
川崎ソープお姉京都
social-proof 50 117.6× 75
https://oideyasuane.com/contact
川崎ソープお姉京都
support 50 117.6× 75
https://oideyasuane.com/faq
質問集|川崎堀之内ソープランド お姉京都
support 50 76.7× 105
https://oideyasuane.com/integrations
川崎ソープお姉京都
integrations 50 117.6× 75
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/blog/ 1 67 0% 33.7× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 50 0% 117.6× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 50 0% 117.6× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 50 0% 117.6× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 1 50 0% 76.7× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 50 0% 117.6× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 50 0% 117.6× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 50 0% 117.6× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 50 0% 117.6× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 1 50 0% 117.6× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
cityheaven.net ×10
goo.gl ×10
mensheaven.jp ×10
yoboukai-clinic.daiwa-comp.co.jp ×10
kanto.qzin.jp ×10
maps.app.goo.gl ×10
fuzoku.jp ×8
ranking-deli.jp ×8
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/oideyasuane.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to oideyasuane.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
oideyasuane.com (this site) 65 85 Custom / Proprietary 2.5× 1
kondela.hu 86 93 Custom / Proprietary 3.1× 4 Compare →
safescan.com 86 87 Custom / Proprietary 1.9× 5 Compare →
pubsandclubs.com.au 86 87 Custom / Proprietary 4.9× 4 Compare →
kruizinga.nl 87 93 Custom / Proprietary 3.0× 5 Compare →
calulu-dogwear.jp 86 88 Custom / Proprietary 2.3× 9 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite oideyasuane.com when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to oideyasuane.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Oideyasuane",
  "url": "https://oideyasuane.com",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://oideyasuane.com/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for oideyasuane.com:

Current Score
85
Projected Score
89
Improvement
+4 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →