objerggaard.com 63 C
🛡️ SEO 66 🤖 GEO 54 ⚡ Perf 68 🏗️ Arch 76

objerggaard.com — Global SEODiff Score 63/100

objerggaard.com
📊

The AI-Readiness profile for objerggaard.com is strong: an ACRI of 80/100 places it ahead of 94% of domains in the index. Compared to other developer sites (avg score: 58), objerggaard.com performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. A 50.0× token bloat ratio means crawlers must process significantly more tokens to reach the actual content — a drag on extraction efficiency. Structured data coverage is solid at 2 blocks, covering core entities — expanding to include FAQ or Breadcrumb schemas could strengthen the profile further. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

63
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but AI Readiness (54) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (332×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 3 snapshots
Feb 23 Feb 26
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than objerggaard.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)66 × 0.25 = 16.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)54 × 0.40 = 21.6
⚡ Performance (20% weight)68 × 0.20 = 13.6
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)76 × 0.15 = 11.4
Weighted sum = 16.5 + 21.6 + 13.6 + 11.4
Global SEODiff Score = 63 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
97
Rendering
avg 93
66
Structure
avg 36
44
Schema
avg 9
55
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 50%+
Rank #996911
-93 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 6%
Score 80/100

objerggaard.com ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 50%+) than in AI search (Top 6%). This is the 'Invisible Giant' pattern — implement the patches above to close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why objerggaard.com ranks here

Tech stackWix
Industrydeveloper
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage2 blocks
Token bloat50×+

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

66/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

28 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

162 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✗ Has <h2> headings — found 0
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.objerggaard.com
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → da
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Øbjerggaard Bed & Breakfast
  • ✓ og:description — Øbjerggaard er en herregård i Køng, hvor der siden 2015 er blevet drevet bed & breakfast. Kom og besøg os i det smukke Sydsjælland, tæt på skov og strand.
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

54/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the developer sector, hikkoshizamurai.jp (ACRI: 88) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
objerggaard.com
46
Your ACRI Score
88
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. hikkoshizamurai.jp has schema coverage of 5 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 10%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 66/100 — Good
Structured Elements 16 elements (16 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words124
Raw Density12.9%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks2 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

55
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability55/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (80/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

1%
🗑️ 99%
Useful Content (1.3 KB)Bloat (420.5 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio50×+ — Bloated

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context78% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage7 / 9 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 421.8 KB, but only 1.3 KB is text. 1% useful / 99% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (50×+) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 99.7% · SNR: 0.00 · Signal: 325 / Noise: 107646 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWix
AI-Readiness Score55/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time995 ms
Raw HTML Size421.8 KB
Visible Text Size1.3 KB

Performance & Speed

68/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

995 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

319
DOM nodes
422 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✓ CDN cache status → DYNAMIC
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

76/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.objerggaard.com/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

18
internal links
6
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → da
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 46/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for objerggaard.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/objerggaard.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=objerggaard.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
46
Single-page score
-18
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
29
Avg across 10 pages · Range 27–44
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 46, but internal pages average only 29 — a -18-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Total Words
146
Avg Bloat
13.3×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://objerggaard.com/contact support 44 5.0× 47
https://objerggaard.com/pricing
301 Moved Permanently
pricing 27 14.2× 11
https://objerggaard.com/about
301 Moved Permanently
about 27 14.2× 11
https://objerggaard.com/products
301 Moved Permanently
product 27 14.2× 11
https://objerggaard.com/features
301 Moved Permanently
product 27 14.2× 11
https://objerggaard.com/blog
301 Moved Permanently
blog 27 14.2× 11
https://objerggaard.com/docs
301 Moved Permanently
docs 27 14.2× 11
https://objerggaard.com/case-studies
301 Moved Permanently
social-proof 27 14.2× 11
https://objerggaard.com/integrations
301 Moved Permanently
integrations 27 14.2× 11
https://objerggaard.com/faq
301 Moved Permanently
support 27 14.2× 11
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/faq/ 1 27 0% 14.2× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 27 0% 14.2× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 27 0% 14.2× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 27 0% 14.2× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 27 0% 14.2× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 27 0% 14.2× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 27 0% 14.2× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 44 0% 5.0× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 1 27 0% 14.2× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 27 0% 14.2× High JS Bloat
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/objerggaard.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar developer Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to objerggaard.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
objerggaard.com (this site) 46 80 Wix 332.2× 2
brightdata.co.kr 71 91 WordPress 8.2× 2 Compare →
recetasderechupete.com 71 86 WordPress 32.6× 2 Compare →
vapoholic.co.uk 71 83 Express 6.6× 2 Compare →
go.tackle.io 71 90 WordPress 11.0× 2 Compare →
aboveproperty.com 71 79 Joomla 6.4× 2 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to objerggaard.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 0% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for objerggaard.com:

Current Score
80
Projected Score
85
Improvement
+5 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history