netlify.app 58 D
🛡️ SEO 46 🤖 GEO 64 ⚡ Perf 39 🏗️ Arch 90

netlify.app — Global SEODiff Score 58/100

netlify.app
📊

The AI-Readiness profile for netlify.app is strong: an ACRI of 75/100 places it ahead of 81% of domains in the index. Compared to other developer sites (avg score: 58), netlify.app performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Content is delivered server-side, meaning bots and AI agents can parse the full page without executing JavaScript. The bloated 20.5× token ratio highlights an urgent need to clean up non-content markup, scripts, and navigation clutter. No structured data was detected, which means AI systems must infer all entities and relationships from raw HTML alone. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

58
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Performance (39) needs urgent attention.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (20×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 22 snapshots
Feb 22 Feb 26
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than netlify.app?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)46 × 0.25 = 11.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)64 × 0.40 = 25.6
⚡ Performance (20% weight)39 × 0.20 = 7.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)90 × 0.15 = 13.5
Weighted sum = 11.5 + 25.6 + 7.8 + 13.5
Global SEODiff Score = 58 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
57
Structure
avg 36
0
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.2%
Rank #1751
+19 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 19%
Score 75/100

netlify.app punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why netlify.app ranks here

Tech stackAstro
Industrydeveloper
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat20.5×

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

46/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

36 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

102 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 13
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.netlify.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Push your ideas to the web | Netlify
  • ✓ og:description — Build with AI or code, deploy instantly. One platform with everything you need to make real apps live.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

64/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the developer sector, hikkoshizamurai.jp (ACRI: 88) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
netlify.app
55
Your ACRI Score
88
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. hikkoshizamurai.jp has schema coverage of 5 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 57/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 144 elements (144 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1472
Raw Density9.8%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

47
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability47/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (60/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

4%
🗑️ 96%
Useful Content (11.0 KB)Bloat (214.9 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio20.5× — Heavy

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage25 / 25 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 225.9 KB, but only 11.0 KB is text. 4% useful / 96% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (20.5×) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 95.1% · SNR: 0.05 · Signal: 2825 / Noise: 55013 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkAstro
AI-Readiness Score85/100
ServerNetlify
CDNnetlify
HTTP Status200
Load Time1094 ms
Raw HTML Size225.9 KB
Visible Text Size11.0 KB

Performance & Speed

39/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1094 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1725
DOM nodes
226 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → public,max-age=0,must-revalidate
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✓ CDN detected → netlify

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
js.hs-scripts.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

90/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.netlify.com/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

84
internal links
40
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 55/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for netlify.app
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/netlify.app" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=netlify.app" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 8 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
55
Single-page score
-2
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
53
Avg across 8 pages · Range 36–75
Topical Cohesion
5%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
9998
Avg Bloat
62.9×
RAG Fractures [?]
8
Ext. Citations
61
⚠️
8 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 8 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://netlify.app/case-studies
Customer stories
pricing 75 12.1× 2887 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://netlify.app/about
About Netlify
pricing 67 13.0× 3148 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://netlify.app/pricing
Pricing and Plans | Netlify
pricing 64 19.8× 2182 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://netlify.app/docs
Netlify Documentation | Netlify Docs
pricing 56 40.1× 820 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://netlify.app/products
Netlify Platform | The AI-native web development platform
pricing 46 76.2× 330 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://netlify.app/features
Netlify Platform | The AI-native web development platform
pricing 46 76.2× 330 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://netlify.app/blog
Netlify Blog
pricing 36 108.8× 189 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://netlify.app/contact
Contact Netlify
pricing 36 157.0× 112 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/docs/ 1 56 0% 40.1× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 46 0% 76.2× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 64 0% 19.8× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 46 0% 76.2× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 67 0% 13.0× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 36 0% 108.8× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 75 0% 12.1× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 36 0% 157.0× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
61 unique external domains cited across 8 pages
netlify.com ×8
linkedin.com ×8
youtube.com ×8
bsky.app ×8
answers.netlify.com ×8
developers.netlify.com ×8
github.com ×8
twitter.com ×7
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/netlify.app

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar developer Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to netlify.app. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
netlify.app (this site) 55 75 Astro 20.5× 0
netlify.com 55 75 Astro 20.5× 0 Compare →
docs.letta.com 57 83 Astro 21.6× 0 Compare →
bugsnag.com 52 74 Astro 19.8× 0 Compare →
backlog.com 49 73 Astro 19.9× 0 Compare →
backlogtool.com 49 73 Astro 19.9× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🎭

Bait & Switch Delta

B 8 PAGES

Compares your homepage rendering quality with inner pages. A high drift score means AI crawlers see a polished homepage but degraded inner content — the "bait & switch" that erodes trust.

64
Homepage ACRI
52
Inner Avg ACRI
+12
ACRI Delta
20%
Homepage Ghost
29%
Inner Avg Ghost
18
Drift Score [?]
Worst Inner Pages
46 40% pricing https://netlify.app/products
46 40% pricing https://netlify.app/features
36 40% pricing https://netlify.app/blog
🛡️

E-E-A-T Trust Signals

C 50/100

Trust indicators extracted from surface pages. These signals help AI systems verify your site's Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness.

Physical Address
Phone Number
Email Contact
About Page
Contact Page
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Named Leadership
Address: 2022 Developers Drive the Remote Work Future, Jamstack Community Survey Report by Netlify Shows Octo
🔗

Citation Profile

61 DOMAINS

Outbound citation patterns across surface-crawled pages. Sites that cite diverse, authoritative sources signal higher E-E-A-T to AI systems.

133
Total Links
61
Unique Domains
16.6
Avg/Page
46%
Diversity
linkedin.com answers.netlify.com github.com netlify.com bsky.app developers.netlify.com youtube.com twitter.com app.netlify.com docs.netlify.com
🏘️ Outbound Neighborhood Trust Avg Trust: 43.9

AI trust scores for the domains netlify.app links to. Citing high-trust sources lifts your own credibility signal.

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to netlify.app. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Netlify",
  "url": "https://netlify.app",
  "logo": "https://netlify.app/favicon/favicon.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Netlify",
  "url": "https://netlify.app",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://netlify.app/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 4% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Netlify?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Netlify does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Netlify work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Netlify."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for netlify.app:

Current Score
75
Projected Score
93
Improvement
+18 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history