nasmedia.co.kr 69 C
🛡️ SEO 50 🤖 GEO 85 ⚡ Perf 53 🏗️ Arch 80

nasmedia.co.kr — Global SEODiff Score 69/100

nasmedia.co.kr
📊

nasmedia.co.kr shows strong AI visibility with an ACRI of 84/100, outperforming 98% of indexed domains. Compared to other news sites (avg score: 57), nasmedia.co.kr performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The low ghost ratio (0%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. With a 4.9× bloat ratio, the page delivers its content without excessive boilerplate, giving AI systems a clean extraction path. Zero schema blocks puts this site at a disadvantage in knowledge graph and AI-answer pipelines that rely on explicit structured data. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

69
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (50) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add Organization + WebSite JSON-LD → +5–8 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than nasmedia.co.kr?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)50 × 0.25 = 12.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)85 × 0.40 = 34.0
⚡ Performance (20% weight)53 × 0.20 = 10.6
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)80 × 0.15 = 12.0
Weighted sum = 12.5 + 34.0 + 10.6 + 12.0
Global SEODiff Score = 69 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
100
Structure
avg 36
0
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 7%
Rank #72473
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 2%
Score 84/100

nasmedia.co.kr has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why nasmedia.co.kr ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
Industrynews
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat4.9×

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

50/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

39 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

124 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 5
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.nasmedia.co.kr
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ko
  • ✓ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — 케이티 나스미디어 - kt nasmedia
  • ✓ og:description — NO.1 디지털 마케팅 플랫폼 컴퍼니, 통합 미디어 플래닝, 애드테크 플랫폼 사업, 글로벌 마케팅
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

85/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the news sector, news.pchome.com.tw (ACRI: 85) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
nasmedia.co.kr
68
Your ACRI Score
85
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. news.pchome.com.tw has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 100/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 183 elements (183 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words615
Raw Density29.8%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

75
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability75/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

20%
🗑️ 80%
Useful Content (20.8 KB)Bloat (81.6 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio4.9× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context83% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage5 / 6 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

2 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 79.6% · SNR: 0.26 · Signal: 5337 / Noise: 20884 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
ServerApache
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1656 ms
Raw HTML Size102.4 KB
Visible Text Size20.8 KB

Performance & Speed

53/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1656 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1072
DOM nodes
102 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

80/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.nasmedia.co.kr/wp-sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

150
internal links
44
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ko
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 68/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for nasmedia.co.kr
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/nasmedia.co.kr" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=nasmedia.co.kr" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 51 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
68
Single-page score
-24
Severe hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
44
Avg across 51 pages · Range 26–67
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 68, but internal pages average only 44 — a -24-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Total Words
17946
Avg Bloat
107.2×
RAG Fractures [?]
1
⚠️
1 RAG-Chunking Fracture Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 1 page will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.nasmedia.co.kr/투자정보/공시정보/
투자정보 - 공시정보 | 케이티 나스미디어 - kt nasmedia
pricing 67 13.7× 1674 💰 Pricing
https://www.nasmedia.co.kr/개인정보처리방침/
개인정보처리방침 | 케이티 나스미디어 - kt nasmedia
pricing 67 14.9× 2517 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.nasmedia.co.kr/회사소개/보도자료/
보도자료 | 케이티 나스미디어 - kt nasmedia
other 62 21.0× 829
https://www.nasmedia.co.kr/회사소개/윤리경영/
신 윤리경영 원칙 | 케이티 나스미디어 - kt nasmedia
other 62 21.6× 810
https://www.nasmedia.co.kr/회사소개/윤리경영/신-윤리경영-원칙/
신 윤리경영 원칙 | 케이티 나스미디어 - kt nasmedia
other 62 21.6× 810
https://www.nasmedia.co.kr/회사소개/케이티-나스미디어-소개/연혁/
연혁 | 케이티 나스미디어 - kt nasmedia
other 59 27.7× 876
https://www.nasmedia.co.kr/사업영역/ad-study/
디지털 영상 광고 효과 연구, AD Tech 플랫폼 연구, 개발 | 케이티 나스미디어 - kt nasmedia
pricing 59 25.4× 756 💰 Pricing
https://www.nasmedia.co.kr/사업영역/ad-study/research/
디지털 영상 광고 효과 연구, AD Tech 플랫폼 연구, 개발 | 케이티 나스미디어 - kt nasmedia
pricing 59 25.4× 756 💰 Pricing
https://nasmedia.co.kr/about
소개 | 케이티 나스미디어 - kt nasmedia
about 49 58.7× 262
https://www.nasmedia.co.kr/회사소개/케이티-나스미디어-소개/
소개 | 케이티 나스미디어 - kt nasmedia
other 49 58.7× 262
https://www.nasmedia.co.kr/회사소개/윤리경영/윤리위반-신고/
윤리위반신고 | 케이티 나스미디어 - kt nasmedia
other 49 49.9× 311
https://www.nasmedia.co.kr/회사소개/윤리경영/윤리위반-신고/접수-및-결과-확인/
접수 및 결과 확인 | 케이티 나스미디어 - kt nasmedia
other 49 50.0× 312
https://www.nasmedia.co.kr/사업영역/
온·모바일 광고 기획, 전략, 운영 서비스를 제공합니다. | 케이티 나스미디어 - kt nasmedia
other 49 35.3× 492
https://www.nasmedia.co.kr/회사소개/
소개 | 케이티 나스미디어 - kt nasmedia
other 49 58.7× 262
https://www.nasmedia.co.kr/광고문의/
광고문의 | 케이티 나스미디어 - kt nasmedia
other 49 51.6× 493
https://www.nasmedia.co.kr/사업영역/ad-service/
온·모바일 광고 기획, 전략, 운영 서비스를 제공합니다. | 케이티 나스미디어 - kt nasmedia
product 49 35.3× 492
https://www.nasmedia.co.kr/사업영역/ad-platform/
광고 플랫폼으로 성공적인 모바일 마케팅을 지원합니다. | 케이티 나스미디어 - kt nasmedia
pricing 49 71.6× 242 💰 Pricing
https://www.nasmedia.co.kr/회사소개/윤리경영/윤리위반-신고/제보하기/
제보하기 | 케이티 나스미디어 - kt nasmedia
other 49 49.9× 309
https://www.nasmedia.co.kr/사업영역/ad-study/consulting/
구글 마케팅 플랫폼, GA, Firebase, Adobe Analytics 컨설팅 | 케이티 나스미디어 - kt nasmedia
pricing 49 47.3× 369 💰 Pricing
https://www.nasmedia.co.kr/사업영역/ad-service/디지털-방송광고/
디지털 방송광고의 기획, 전략, 운영 서비스를 제공합니다. | 케이티 나스미디어 - kt nasmedia
product 49 59.6× 301
Showing 20 of 51 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/사업영역/ 15 48 0% 58.4× High JS Bloat
/회사소개/ 12 50 0% 61.7× High JS Bloat
/투자정보/ 6 40 0% 146.9× High JS Bloat
/나스리포트/ 6 36 0% 146.1× High JS Bloat
/인재채용/ 5 40 0% 112.1× High JS Bloat
/이메일무단수집거부/ 1 36 0% 220.5× High JS Bloat
/윤리위반신고/ 1 26 0% 435.0× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 49 0% 58.7× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 26 0% 316.8× High JS Bloat
/관계사/ 1 26 0% 434.1× High JS Bloat
/개인정보처리방침/ 1 67 0% 14.9× High JS Bloat
/광고문의/ 1 49 0% 51.6× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 51 pages
skylifetv.co.kr ×51
bccard.com ×51
ktis.co.kr ×51
ktsubmarine.co.kr ×51
kttelecop.co.kr ×51
ktmns.com ×51
ktestate.com ×51
geniemusic.co.kr ×51
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/nasmedia.co.kr

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar news Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to nasmedia.co.kr. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
nasmedia.co.kr (this site) 68 84 WordPress 4.9× 0
lnews.jp 76 84 WordPress 3.6× 2 Compare →
hrnote.jp 78 90 WordPress 2.8× 1 Compare →
tradingcardjournal.com 75 89 WordPress 8.7× 1 Compare →
gratis-sexnoveller.dk 75 84 WordPress 14.0× 1 Compare →
panty-kiwami.com 76 89 WordPress 21.4× 6 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite nasmedia.co.kr when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to nasmedia.co.kr. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Co",
  "url": "https://nasmedia.co.kr",
  "logo": "https://www.nasmedia.co.kr/wp-content/themes/nasmedia/images/favicon/r-01.png",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Co",
  "url": "https://nasmedia.co.kr",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://nasmedia.co.kr/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Co?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Co does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Co work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Co."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for nasmedia.co.kr:

Current Score
84
Projected Score
100
Improvement
+16 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history