mtlynch.io 63 C
🛡️ SEO 22 🤖 GEO 73 ⚡ Perf 80 🏗️ Arch 80

mtlynch.io — Global SEODiff Score 63/100

mtlynch.io
📊

At 56/100, mtlynch.io falls in the moderate bracket of AI-Readiness, suggesting its content is partially accessible to AI systems but not fully optimized. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. The token bloat ratio sits at a lean 4.2×, meaning the ratio of code to visible content is efficient — crawlers spend their token budget on actual information. Zero schema blocks puts this site at a disadvantage in knowledge graph and AI-answer pipelines that rely on explicit structured data. With only minimal AI bot access, the domain is largely invisible to the ecosystem of AI-driven discovery tools.

63
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (22) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add Organization + WebSite JSON-LD → +5–8 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than mtlynch.io?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)22 × 0.25 = 5.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)73 × 0.40 = 29.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)80 × 0.20 = 16.0
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)80 × 0.15 = 12.0
Weighted sum = 5.5 + 29.2 + 16.0 + 12.0
Global SEODiff Score = 63 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
40
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
50
Structure
avg 35
0
Schema
avg 10
90
Tech Stack
avg 64
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 37%
Rank #368131
+19 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 55%
Score 56/100

mtlynch.io punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why mtlynch.io ranks here

Tech stackHugo
Industry
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat4.2×

Fastest improvements

  • Allow GPTBot in robots.txt so AI crawlers can access your pages (see Crawl Access).
  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

22/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

10 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

62 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 9
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://mtlynch.io/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — mtlynch.io
  • ✓ og:description — Updates about my life and what I learn about creating software
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

73/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Blocked
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Blocked
Google-Extended
Blocked
Googlebot
Allowed
💡GPTBot is blocked. To appear in ChatGPT citations, add Allow: / under User-agent: GPTBot in your robots.txt.

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 50/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 31 elements (31 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words415
Raw Density7.5%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

60
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
High
Blocklist Risk
Extractability60/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (10/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskHigh — 3 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

23%
🗑️ 77%
Useful Content (2.6 KB)Bloat (8.3 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio4.2× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context22% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage2 / 9 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Only 22% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

20 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 76.3% · SNR: 0.31 · Signal: 663 / Noise: 2136 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkHugo
AI-Readiness Score90/100
ServerNetlify
CDNnetlify
HTTP Status200
Load Time516 ms
Raw HTML Size10.9 KB
Visible Text Size2.6 KB

Performance & Speed

80/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

516 ms
Acceptable — room for improvement

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

183
DOM nodes
11 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → public,max-age=0,must-revalidate
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✓ CDN detected → netlify

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

80/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://mtlynch.io/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✗ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

54
internal links
5
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 43/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for mtlynch.io
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/mtlynch.io" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=mtlynch.io" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 1 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
43
Single-page score
+4
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
47
Avg across 1 pages · Range 47–47
Total Words
85
Avg Bloat
12.7×
Ext. Citations
5
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://mtlynch.io/about
About · mtlynch.io
about 47 12.7× 85
🔗
Outbound External Citations
5 unique external domains cited across 1 pages
github.com ×1
bsky.app ×1
twitter.com ×1
creativecommons.org ×1
m.mtlynch.io ×1
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/mtlynch.io

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to mtlynch.io. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
mtlynch.io (this site) 43 56 Hugo 4.2× 0
data.coop 43 72 Hugo 4.0× 0 Compare →
c3voc.de 43 15 Hugo 4.4× 0 Compare →
magicbroccoli.de 43 69 Hugo 4.6× 0 Compare →
openssl.org 43 15 Hugo 3.7× 0 Compare →
ezcamlive.com 42 72 Hugo 4.2× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to mtlynch.io. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Mtlynch",
  "url": "https://mtlynch.io",
  "logo": "https://mtlynch.io/images/favicon/favicon-32x32.png",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Mtlynch",
  "url": "https://mtlynch.io",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://mtlynch.io/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Allow GPTBot in robots.txt
High Impact ⏱ 2 min
GPTBot is blocked — your content cannot appear in ChatGPT citations. Add this to your robots.txt:
text
User-agent: GPTBot
Allow: /

User-agent: ChatGPT-User
Allow: /
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Mtlynch?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Mtlynch does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Mtlynch work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Mtlynch."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for mtlynch.io:

Current Score
56
Projected Score
80
Improvement
+24 pts
Allow GPTBot +8 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history