mirrormedia.mg 48 D
🛡️ SEO 20 🤖 GEO 61 ⚡ Perf 29 🏗️ Arch 83

mirrormedia.mg — Global SEODiff Score 48/100

mirrormedia.mg
📊

With a solid 77/100 ACRI, mirrormedia.mg is well-positioned for AI search — better than 86% of sites in the Radar. Within the developer vertical, this places mirrormedia.mg above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. The bloated 50.0× token ratio highlights an urgent need to clean up non-content markup, scripts, and navigation clutter. The complete absence of JSON-LD schema is a missed opportunity: even basic Organization markup would improve how AI crawlers understand this domain. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

48
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Traditional SEO (20) has the most room for improvement.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (105×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 3 snapshots
Feb 23 Feb 26
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than mirrormedia.mg?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)20 × 0.25 = 5.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)61 × 0.40 = 24.4
⚡ Performance (20% weight)29 × 0.20 = 5.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)83 × 0.15 = 12.4
Weighted sum = 5.0 + 24.4 + 5.8 + 12.4
Global SEODiff Score = 48 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
76
Structure
avg 36
0
Schema
avg 9
70
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 5%
Rank #45109
+10 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 14%
Score 77/100

mirrormedia.mg shows stronger AI visibility than traditional SEO ranking. Great AI foundation to build on. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why mirrormedia.mg ranks here

Tech stackNext.js
Industrydeveloper
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat50×+

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

20/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

22 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

324 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 2
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.mirrormedia.mg/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → zh-Hant
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — 鏡週刊 Mirror Media
  • ✓ og:description — 鏡傳媒以台灣為基地,是一跨平台綜合媒體,包含《鏡週刊》以及下設五大分眾內容的《鏡傳媒》網站,刊載時事、財經、人物、國際、文化、娛樂、美食旅遊、精品鐘錶等深入報導及影音內容。我們以「鏡」為名,務求反映事實、時代與人性。
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

61/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the developer sector, hikkoshizamurai.jp (ACRI: 88) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
mirrormedia.mg
48
Your ACRI Score
88
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. hikkoshizamurai.jp has schema coverage of 5 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 76/100 — Good
Structured Elements 60 elements (60 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words349
Raw Density17.2%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

49
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability49/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (100/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

1%
🗑️ 99%
Useful Content (7.2 KB)Bloat (747.0 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio50×+ — Bloated

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context98% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage56 / 57 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 754.2 KB, but only 7.2 KB is text. 1% useful / 99% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (50×+) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 99.0% · SNR: 0.01 · Signal: 1835 / Noise: 191236 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkNext.js
AI-Readiness Score70/100
ServerGoogle Frontend
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time2274 ms
Raw HTML Size754.2 KB
Visible Text Size7.2 KB

Performance & Speed

29/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

2274 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

833
DOM nodes
754 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → public, max-age=180
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
doubleclick.net
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

83/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.mirrormedia.mg/rss/posts.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

207
internal links
19
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → zh-Hant
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 48/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for mirrormedia.mg
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/mirrormedia.mg" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=mirrormedia.mg" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 75 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
48
Single-page score
-3
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
46
Avg across 75 pages · Range 41–56
Total Words
6926
Avg Bloat
1138.2×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.mirrormedia.mg/story/20260210pol001
鏡相人間/怪物的誕生 - 鏡週刊 Mirror Media
other 56 688.7× 203
https://www.mirrormedia.mg/story/20260224ent009
鏡爆焦點/聚會發飆不給面子 劉雨柔球星老公動念想離婚 - 鏡週刊 Mirror Media
other 46 1028.2× 110
https://www.mirrormedia.mg/story/20260301edi012
伊朗證實「哈米尼遭美以空襲身亡」! 37年統治告終、全國哀悼40天 - 鏡週刊 Mirror Media
other 46 1063.3× 95
https://www.mirrormedia.mg/story/20260227rweb002
有片/有錢就是狂!布蘭妮變賣版權爽領63億美金 大跳露點艷舞全看光 - 鏡週刊 Mirror Media
other 46 1233.8× 85
https://www.mirrormedia.mg/story/20260228edi019
不是搞笑!日本研發三溫暖「護蛋神器」 亞馬遜上架銷量衝第一 - 鏡週刊 Mirror Media
other 46 1102.5× 93
https://www.mirrormedia.mg/story/20260228ent002
AKIRA出道20週年出個人EP 88父親節與台迷有約 - 鏡週刊 Mirror Media
other 46 902.4× 112
https://www.mirrormedia.mg/story/20260301soc002
假銀行電郵夾帶假網站狂吞80萬元 18人年終血汗錢全飛了 - 鏡週刊 Mirror Media
other 46 1152.8× 91
https://www.mirrormedia.mg/story/20260301edi014
川普斬首哈米尼! 「第一千金」伊凡卡同日穿黑衣帶2子出街 - 鏡週刊 Mirror Media
other 46 1092.3× 93
https://www.mirrormedia.mg/story/20260301edi019
揪千人南港車聚挨轟擾民!王陽明喊「太瘋狂了」 警方取締53件違規 - 鏡週刊 Mirror Media
other 46 1128.3× 92
https://www.mirrormedia.mg/story/20260301edi011
哈米尼女兒、女婿、孫子傳空襲身亡!4子2女曝光 接班布局恐生變 - 鏡週刊 Mirror Media
other 46 1020.5× 100
https://www.mirrormedia.mg/story/20260301edi003
元宵節遇月全食!赤馬遇紅月 命理師示警3禁忌:恐燒掉好財路 - 鏡週刊 Mirror Media
other 46 1121.2× 91
https://www.mirrormedia.mg/story/20260301edi002
汐止知名電商「皇兒小舖」深夜陷火海! 負責人發文洩心聲 - 鏡週刊 Mirror Media
other 46 1125.7× 90
https://www.mirrormedia.mg/story/20260228edi030
美國參與!以色列轟炸伊朗攻擊最高領袖辦公室 哈米尼傳已離開德黑蘭 - 鏡週刊 Mirror Media
other 46 1110.2× 92
https://www.mirrormedia.mg/story/20260301edi010
伊朗無人機襲杜拜!帆船飯店起火 機場停飛逾1600航班取消 - 鏡週刊 Mirror Media
other 46 1137.8× 92
https://www.mirrormedia.mg/story/20260301edi001
春雨報到!明起鋒面南下 又濕又涼 - 鏡週刊 Mirror Media
other 46 1025.6× 100
https://www.mirrormedia.mg/story/20260301edi018
傳「狐獴交疊照」性騷女同學!男大生挨告裝傻不知是交配 證人「致命一擊」大翻車 - 鏡週刊 Mirror Media
other 46 928.1× 112
https://www.mirrormedia.mg/story/20260212inf002
影評/《總統的蛋糕》 你做壽我受罪 - 鏡週刊 Mirror Media
other 46 1084.5× 97
https://www.mirrormedia.mg/story/20260301soc005
男師邀到摩鐵避雨卻性侵 女高中生提告性侵1年後墜樓亡師獲判無罪 - 鏡週刊 Mirror Media
other 46 1121.7× 91
https://www.mirrormedia.mg/story/20260301ent002
柳演錫被附身 《神與律師事務所》演技大爆發 - 鏡週刊 Mirror Media
other 46 1124.7× 90
https://www.mirrormedia.mg/story/20260301fin005
謝震武三度代言 戴永輝領軍大大數位續辦捐血嘉年華 - 鏡週刊 Mirror Media
other 46 1179.1× 85
Showing 20 of 75 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/story/ 75 46 1% 1138.2× Bot Blocked
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 75 pages
instagram.com ×75
voice.mirrorfiction.com ×75
youtube.com ×75
developers.google.com ×75
momoshop.com.tw ×75
mmesh.news ×75
line.me ×75
facebook.com ×75
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/mirrormedia.mg

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar developer Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to mirrormedia.mg. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
mirrormedia.mg (this site) 48 77 Next.js 105.2× 0
ansin168.com 73 82 Next.js 6.5× 1 Compare →
morpher.ru 73 79 Custom / Proprietary 2.9× 0 Compare →
apollo.auto 73 80 Custom / Proprietary 1.6× 0 Compare →
search.wolfram.com 73 80 Custom / Proprietary 3.4× 0 Compare →
inveniordm.docs.cern.ch 73 80 Custom / Proprietary 2.1× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite mirrormedia.mg when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to mirrormedia.mg. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Mirrormedia",
  "url": "https://mirrormedia.mg",
  "logo": "https://mirrormedia.mg/apple-touch-icon.png",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Mirrormedia",
  "url": "https://mirrormedia.mg",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://mirrormedia.mg/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 0% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Mirrormedia?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Mirrormedia does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Mirrormedia work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Mirrormedia."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for mirrormedia.mg:

Current Score
77
Projected Score
95
Improvement
+18 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history