menudigital.app.br 62 C
🛡️ SEO 38 🤖 GEO 82 ⚡ Perf 59 🏗️ Arch 53

menudigital.app.br — Global SEODiff Score 62/100

menudigital.app.br
📊

menudigital.app.br shows strong AI visibility with an ACRI of 75/100, outperforming 81% of indexed domains. Within the infrastructure vertical, this places menudigital.app.br above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. With a 2.8× bloat ratio, the page delivers its content without excessive boilerplate, giving AI systems a clean extraction path. The site includes 2 schema blocks, providing adequate structured data for basic entity recognition. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

62
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (38) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Fix title tag length → +3 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 7, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 5 snapshots
Feb 23 Mar 7
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than menudigital.app.br?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)38 × 0.25 = 9.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)82 × 0.40 = 32.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)59 × 0.20 = 11.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)53 × 0.15 = 7.9
Weighted sum = 9.5 + 32.8 + 11.8 + 7.9
Global SEODiff Score = 62 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
42
Structure
avg 36
44
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 50%+
Rank #793079
-60 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 19%
Score 75/100

menudigital.app.br ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 50%+) than in AI search (Top 19%). This is the 'Visibility Gap' pattern — implementing the recommendations above can help close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why menudigital.app.br ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage2 blocks
Token bloat2.8×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

38/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

97 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

152 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 14
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.menudigital.app.br
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → pt-BR
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Cardápio QR Code + PDF Premium para Impressão (Grátis) | Menu Digital
  • ✓ og:description — Cardápio QR Code ou impresso? Tenha os dois. Só com o Menu Digital você gera o PDF premium para imprimir quando quiser (grátis em todos os planos).
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

82/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, plodopitomnik-sad.ru (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
menudigital.app.br
61
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. plodopitomnik-sad.ru has schema coverage of 12 blocks and uses Express. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 42/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 100 elements (79 lists, 16 rows, 5 headers)
Total Words1911
Raw Density5.2%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks2 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

68
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability68/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (10/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

35%
🗑️ 65%
Useful Content (13.8 KB)Bloat (25.1 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio2.8× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context0% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage0 / 19 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Only 0% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

55 Entropy
Fair Token Bloat: Medium
Noise Ratio: 64.6% · SNR: 0.55 · Signal: 3521 / Noise: 6416 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Serverhcdn
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1094 ms
Raw HTML Size38.8 KB
Visible Text Size13.8 KB

Performance & Speed

59/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1094 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

830
DOM nodes
39 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

53/100 15 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

4
internal links
0
external links
Limited internal links — consider adding contextual cross-links

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → pt-BR
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 61/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for menudigital.app.br
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/menudigital.app.br" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=menudigital.app.br" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
61
Single-page score
-35
Severe hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
26
Avg across 10 pages · Range 26–26
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 61, but internal pages average only 26 — a -35-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Total Words
140
Avg Bloat
31.2×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://menudigital.app.br/pricing
Menu Digital não encontrado
pricing 26 31.2× 14
https://menudigital.app.br/about
Menu Digital não encontrado
about 26 31.2× 14
https://menudigital.app.br/features
Menu Digital não encontrado
product 26 31.2× 14
https://menudigital.app.br/products
Menu Digital não encontrado
product 26 31.2× 14
https://menudigital.app.br/docs
Menu Digital não encontrado
docs 26 31.2× 14
https://menudigital.app.br/blog
Menu Digital não encontrado
blog 26 31.2× 14
https://menudigital.app.br/case-studies
Menu Digital não encontrado
social-proof 26 31.2× 14
https://menudigital.app.br/faq
Menu Digital não encontrado
support 26 31.2× 14
https://menudigital.app.br/contact
Menu Digital não encontrado
support 26 31.2× 14
https://menudigital.app.br/integrations
Menu Digital não encontrado
integrations 26 31.2× 14
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/integrations/ 1 26 0% 31.2× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 26 0% 31.2× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 26 0% 31.2× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 26 0% 31.2× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 26 0% 31.2× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 26 0% 31.2× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 1 26 0% 31.2× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 26 0% 31.2× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 26 0% 31.2× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 26 0% 31.2× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
instagram.com ×10
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/menudigital.app.br

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to menudigital.app.br. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
menudigital.app.br (this site) 61 75 Custom / Proprietary 2.8× 2
lobbes.nl 85 86 Custom / Proprietary 1.5× 2 Compare →
kondela.hu 86 93 Custom / Proprietary 3.2× 4 Compare →
churchfind.com.au 86 87 Custom / Proprietary 4.9× 4 Compare →
insuranceyet.com 86 87 Custom / Proprietary 4.9× 4 Compare →
pubsandclubs.com.au 86 87 Custom / Proprietary 4.9× 4 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite menudigital.app.br when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to menudigital.app.br. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is App?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what App does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does App work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with App."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for menudigital.app.br:

Current Score
75
Projected Score
78
Improvement
+3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history