mediainfo.com 56 D
🛡️ SEO 67 🤖 GEO 45 ⚡ Perf 62 🏗️ Arch 61
Radar → Domains → mediainfo.com

mediainfo.com — Global SEODiff Score 56/100

mediainfo.com
📊

mediainfo.com has earned a 90/100 ACRI — a tier-1 result that puts it ahead of 99% of sites in the SEODiff Radar. In the social sector, mediainfo.com outperforms the average (58), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. The bloated 45.4× token ratio highlights an urgent need to clean up non-content markup, scripts, and navigation clutter. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

56
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — AI Readiness (45) needs urgent attention.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (45×) → +5–10 pts
67
🛡️ Traditional SEO
45
🤖 AI Readiness
62
⚡ Performance
61
🏗️ Architecture
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 25, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 2 snapshots
Feb 23 Feb 25
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than mediainfo.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)67 × 0.25 = 16.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)45 × 0.40 = 18.0
⚡ Performance (20% weight)62 × 0.20 = 12.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)61 × 0.15 = 9.2
Weighted sum = 16.8 + 18.0 + 12.4 + 9.2
Global SEODiff Score = 56 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
100
Structure
avg 36
42
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 42%
Rank #419935
-40 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 1%
Score 90/100

mediainfo.com ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 42%) than in AI search (Top 1%). This is the 'Invisible Giant' pattern — implement the patches above to close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why mediainfo.com ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
Industrysocial
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat45.4×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
See other WordPress sites → social industry → Full leaderboard → Domain A–Z →
🛡️

Traditional SEO

67/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

25 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

130 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✗ Has <h2> headings — found 0
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.mediainfo.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — MediaINFO Digital Library
  • ✓ og:description — MediaINFO is a Digital Library System made for easy browsing, searching, cataloging and sharing of digitized culture and heritage.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

45/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the social sector, plodopitomnik-sad.by (ACRI: 89) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
mediainfo.com
54
Your ACRI Score
→
plodopitomnik-sad.by
89
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. plodopitomnik-sad.by has schema coverage of 11 blocks and uses Express. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

✅
GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
✅
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
✅
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
✅
Google-Extended
Allowed
✅
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 100/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 42 elements (42 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words70
Raw Density60.0%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

3/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

68
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability68/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (45/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

2%
🗑️ 98%
Useful Content (3.2 KB)Bloat (141.2 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio45.4× — Bloated

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context47% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage14 / 30 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 144.4 KB, but only 3.2 KB is text. 2% useful / 98% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (45.4×) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.
💡Only 47% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 97.8% · SNR: 0.02 · Signal: 813 / Noise: 36146 tokens
Run Full Entropy Audit →

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
ServerApache
CDN—
HTTP Status200
Load Time1484 ms
Raw HTML Size144.4 KB
Visible Text Size3.2 KB
⚡

Performance & Speed

62/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1484 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

469
DOM nodes
144 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

2
tracker scripts
2
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.comgoogle-analytics
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

61/100 15 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

43
internal links
6
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 54/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for mediainfo.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold 
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/mediainfo.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=mediainfo.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
54
Single-page score
-20
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
34
Avg across 10 pages · Range 34–34
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 54, but internal pages average only 34 — a -20-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Total Words
220
Avg Bloat
1344.0×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://mediainfo.com/pricing
MediaINFO Digital Library
 pricing 34 1344.0× 22 ✓
https://mediainfo.com/about
MediaINFO Digital Library
 about 34 1344.0× 22 ✓
https://mediainfo.com/products
MediaINFO Digital Library
 product 34 1344.0× 22 ✓
https://mediainfo.com/features
MediaINFO Digital Library
 product 34 1344.0× 22 ✓
https://mediainfo.com/blog
MediaINFO Digital Library
 blog 34 1344.0× 22 ✓
https://mediainfo.com/docs
MediaINFO Digital Library
 docs 34 1344.0× 22 ✓
https://mediainfo.com/case-studies
MediaINFO Digital Library
 social-proof 34 1344.0× 22 ✓
https://mediainfo.com/integrations
MediaINFO Digital Library
 integrations 34 1344.0× 22 ✓
https://mediainfo.com/contact
MediaINFO Digital Library
 support 34 1344.0× 22 ✓
https://mediainfo.com/faq
MediaINFO Digital Library
 support 34 1344.0× 22 ✓
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/products/ 1 34 0% 1344.0× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 34 0% 1344.0× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 1 34 0% 1344.0× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 1 34 0% 1344.0× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 34 0% 1344.0× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 34 0% 1344.0× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 34 0% 1344.0× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 34 0% 1344.0× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 34 0% 1344.0× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 34 0% 1344.0× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
micapotocnik.com ×10
youtube.com ×10
demo.mediainfo.com ×10
twitter.com ×10
facebook.com ×10
linkedin.com ×10
support.mediainfo.com ×10
pinterest.com ×10
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API. 

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/mediainfo.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar social Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to mediainfo.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
mediainfo.com (this site) 54 90 WordPress 45.4× 1 —
ufamax168c.com 79 81 WordPress 2.4× 1 Compare →
blog.taxbandits.com 79 90 WordPress 11.2× 1 Compare →
dermacentergt.com 79 90 WordPress 11.0× 1 Compare →
ghnews1.com 79 83 WordPress 4.5× 1 Compare →
danmonshop.dk 79 90 WordPress 10.0× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to mediainfo.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 2% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html 
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for mediainfo.com:

Current Score
90
Projected Score
95
Improvement
+5 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

📄 Generate llms.txt 📊 Export JSON Data 📸 Download Visual

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking
Open My Site report → Open Self-Diffing incidents → Open History timeline →

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history

📚 Research & Documentation

🔬
The Science of ACRI
Methodology behind the AI-Crawler Reality Index scoring model.
🚨
Hallucination Risk Study
How poor crawl access increases AI fabrication rates by 3.5×.
🔥
Structural Entropy Paper
The median web page wastes 55% of tokens on noise. Here's the data.
🧪
Extraction Lab Paper
Causal evidence that semantic HTML structure increases AI extraction accuracy.
📖
Documentation Hub
Metrics definitions, fix guides, and API reference for CI/CD integration.
🛠️
Free Tools
llms.txt generator, hallucination checker, entropy audit, and more.