magnoliaradio.com 79 B
🛡️ SEO 88 🤖 GEO 82 ⚡ Perf 62 🏗️ Arch 76
Radar → Domains → magnoliaradio.com

magnoliaradio.com — Global SEODiff Score 79/100

magnoliaradio.com
📊

At 79/100, the ACRI for magnoliaradio.com indicates strong fundamentals in AI extractability, surpassing the majority of indexed sites. In the infrastructure sector, magnoliaradio.com outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. The token bloat ratio sits at a lean 3.6×, meaning the ratio of code to visible content is efficient — crawlers spend their token budget on actual information. Minimal structured data (1 block) limits the site's ability to communicate entity relationships to AI systems. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

79
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (62) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
88
🛡️ Traditional SEO
82
🤖 AI Readiness
62
⚡ Performance
76
🏗️ Architecture
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 25, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than magnoliaradio.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)88 × 0.25 = 22.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)82 × 0.40 = 32.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)62 × 0.20 = 12.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)76 × 0.15 = 11.4
Weighted sum = 22.0 + 32.8 + 12.4 + 11.4
Global SEODiff Score = 79 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
23
Structure
avg 35
82
Schema
avg 10
75
Tech Stack
avg 64
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 15%
Rank #153618
-6 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 9%
Score 79/100

magnoliaradio.com is more visible to Google than to AI models. There's room to improve AI discoverability to match your search reputation. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why magnoliaradio.com ranks here

Tech stackCloudflare Pages
Industryinfrastructure
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat3.6×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
See other Cloudflare Pages sites → infrastructure industry → Full leaderboard → Domain A–Z →
🛡️

Traditional SEO

88/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

61 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

172 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 7
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https:/magnoliaradio.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → tr
  • ✓ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Paribahis Giriş 2026 | Türkçe Krupiyeler, 4K Canlı Casino
  • ✓ og:description — Evolution Gaming & Pragmatic Play ile Türkçe canlı casino. %98.6 RTP, 4K yayın, 25+ Türkçe masa.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

82/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
magnoliaradio.com
61
Your ACRI Score
→
safely.co.jp
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

✅
GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
✅
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
✅
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
✅
Google-Extended
Allowed
✅
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 23/100 — Low
Structured Elements 13 elements (13 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words796
Raw Density1.6%
💡Low structure score (23/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 13 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ✅ Present
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

6/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
✅ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
✅ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

72
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability72/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

27%
🗑️ 73%
Useful Content (20.7 KB)Bloat (52.9 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio3.6× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage2 / 2 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

35 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 71.8% · SNR: 0.39 · Signal: 5310 / Noise: 13549 tokens
Run Full Entropy Audit →

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkCloudflare Pages
AI-Readiness Score75/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time1149 ms
Raw HTML Size73.7 KB
Visible Text Size20.7 KB
⚡

Performance & Speed

62/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1149 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

439
DOM nodes
74 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✓ CDN cache status → DYNAMIC
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

76/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://guyanainc.biz/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

9
internal links
7
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → tr
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 61/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for magnoliaradio.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold 
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/magnoliaradio.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=magnoliaradio.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to magnoliaradio.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
magnoliaradio.com (this site) 61 79 Cloudflare Pages 3.6× 1 —
guyanainc.biz 61 79 Cloudflare Pages 3.6× 1 Compare →
halden-idrettsrad.com 61 79 Cloudflare Pages 3.6× 1 Compare →
risalehaber.com 61 77 Cloudflare Pages 3.6× 1 Compare →
sayhentai.mom 61 15 Cloudflare Pages 3.5× 1 Compare →
statelife.com.pk 61 76 Cloudflare Pages 3.5× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

📄 Generate llms.txt 📊 Export JSON Data 📸 Download Visual

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking
Open My Site report → Open Self-Diffing incidents → Open History timeline →

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history

📚 Research & Documentation

🔬
The Science of ACRI
Methodology behind the AI-Crawler Reality Index scoring model.
🚨
Hallucination Risk Study
How poor crawl access increases AI fabrication rates by 3.5×.
🔥
Structural Entropy Paper
The median web page wastes 55% of tokens on noise. Here's the data.
🧪
Extraction Lab Paper
Causal evidence that semantic HTML structure increases AI extraction accuracy.
📖
Documentation Hub
Metrics definitions, fix guides, and API reference for CI/CD integration.
🛠️
Free Tools
llms.txt generator, hallucination checker, entropy audit, and more.