madfotograf.net 77 B
🛡️ SEO 75 🤖 GEO 83 ⚡ Perf 62 🏗️ Arch 83

madfotograf.net — Global SEODiff Score 77/100

madfotograf.net
📊

The AI-Readiness profile for madfotograf.net is strong: an ACRI of 66/100 places it ahead of 59% of domains in the index. In the infrastructure sector, madfotograf.net outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The low ghost ratio (5%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. With a 2.1× bloat ratio, the page delivers its content without excessive boilerplate, giving AI systems a clean extraction path. Structured data coverage is solid at 3 blocks, covering core entities — expanding to include FAQ or Breadcrumb schemas could strengthen the profile further. The site allows access to some AI bots but restricts others, creating an uneven visibility profile across AI-powered services.

77
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (62) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 25, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than madfotograf.net?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)75 × 0.25 = 18.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)83 × 0.40 = 33.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)62 × 0.20 = 12.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)83 × 0.15 = 12.4
Weighted sum = 18.8 + 33.2 + 12.4 + 12.4
Global SEODiff Score = 77 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
60
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
42
Structure
avg 35
46
Schema
avg 10
75
Tech Stack
avg 64
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 50%+
Rank #957400
-54 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 41%
Score 66/100

madfotograf.net ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 50%+) than in AI search (Top 41%). This is the 'Invisible Giant' pattern — implement the patches above to close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why madfotograf.net ranks here

Tech stackCloudflare Pages
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage3 blocks
Token bloat2.1×

Fastest improvements

  • Allow GPTBot in robots.txt so AI crawlers can access your pages (see Crawl Access).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

75/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

53 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

156 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 8
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://madfotograf.net/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → da-DK
  • ✓ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Bedste Online Casino uden ROFUS 2025 | Nem Udbetaling
  • ✓ og:description — Find det bedste online casino uden ROFUS med dansk support 🎯, free spins uden indbetaling og nem udbetaling – spil sikkert og uden begrænsninger! 💰
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

83/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
madfotograf.net
63
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Blocked
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Blocked
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed
💡GPTBot is blocked. To appear in ChatGPT citations, add Allow: / under User-agent: GPTBot in your robots.txt.

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 42/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 123 elements (98 lists, 13 rows, 12 headers)
Total Words2328
Raw Density5.3%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks3 blocks

Schema Coverage Map

3/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
✅ FAQ
✅ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

69
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
Medium
Blocklist Risk
Extractability69/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskMedium — 2 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

47%
🗑️ 53%
Useful Content (25.1 KB)Bloat (26.9 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio2.1× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage10 / 10 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

73 Entropy
Good Token Bloat: Low
Noise Ratio: 51.7% · SNR: 0.94 · Signal: 6435 / Noise: 6876 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score75/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time1150 ms
Raw HTML Size52.0 KB
Visible Text Size25.1 KB

Performance & Speed

62/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1150 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

514
DOM nodes
52 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✓ CDN cache status → DYNAMIC
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

83/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://madfotograf.net/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✗ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

42
internal links
1
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → da-DK
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 63/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for madfotograf.net
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/madfotograf.net" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=madfotograf.net" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
63
Single-page score
+32
Subpages outperform homepage
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
95
Avg across 10 pages · Range 95–95
Total Words
22860
Avg Bloat
4.7×
Ext. Citations
1
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://madfotograf.net/pricing
Bedste Online Casino uden ROFUS 2025 | Nem Udbetaling
pricing 95 4.7× 2286 💰 Pricing
https://madfotograf.net/about
Bedste Online Casino uden ROFUS 2025 | Nem Udbetaling
pricing 95 4.7× 2286 💰 Pricing
https://madfotograf.net/products
Bedste Online Casino uden ROFUS 2025 | Nem Udbetaling
pricing 95 4.7× 2286 💰 Pricing
https://madfotograf.net/features
Bedste Online Casino uden ROFUS 2025 | Nem Udbetaling
pricing 95 4.7× 2286 💰 Pricing
https://madfotograf.net/blog
Bedste Online Casino uden ROFUS 2025 | Nem Udbetaling
pricing 95 4.7× 2286 💰 Pricing
https://madfotograf.net/docs
Bedste Online Casino uden ROFUS 2025 | Nem Udbetaling
pricing 95 4.7× 2286 💰 Pricing
https://madfotograf.net/case-studies
Bedste Online Casino uden ROFUS 2025 | Nem Udbetaling
pricing 95 4.7× 2286 💰 Pricing
https://madfotograf.net/faq
Bedste Online Casino uden ROFUS 2025 | Nem Udbetaling
pricing 95 4.7× 2286 💰 Pricing
https://madfotograf.net/contact
Bedste Online Casino uden ROFUS 2025 | Nem Udbetaling
pricing 95 4.7× 2286 💰 Pricing
https://madfotograf.net/integrations
Bedste Online Casino uden ROFUS 2025 | Nem Udbetaling
pricing 95 4.7× 2286 💰 Pricing
🔗
Outbound External Citations
1 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
dmca.com ×10
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/madfotograf.net

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to madfotograf.net. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
madfotograf.net (this site) 63 66 Cloudflare Pages 2.1× 3
hentaifull.net 63 72 Cloudflare Pages 2.1× 3 Compare →
condesadf.mx 63 66 Cloudflare Pages 2.1× 3 Compare →
condesadfmx.com 63 66 Cloudflare Pages 2.1× 3 Compare →
glavcom.ua 63 72 Cloudflare Pages 2.0× 3 Compare →
tatilox.com 63 78 Cloudflare Pages 2.3× 3 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to madfotograf.net. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Madfotograf",
  "url": "https://madfotograf.net",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://madfotograf.net/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Allow GPTBot in robots.txt
High Impact ⏱ 2 min
GPTBot is blocked — your content cannot appear in ChatGPT citations. Add this to your robots.txt:
text
User-agent: GPTBot
Allow: /

User-agent: ChatGPT-User
Allow: /
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for madfotograf.net:

Current Score
66
Projected Score
78
Improvement
+12 pts
Allow GPTBot +8 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history