llumar.com 78 B
🛡️ SEO 67 🤖 GEO 86 ⚡ Perf 74 🏗️ Arch 83

llumar.com — Global SEODiff Score 78/100

llumar.com
📊

Registering an exceptional 87/100 on the AI-Crawler Reality Index, llumar.com sits in the highest tier of AI extractability among indexed domains. Compared to other infrastructure sites (avg score: 58), llumar.com performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. The token bloat ratio sits at a lean 3.5×, meaning the ratio of code to visible content is efficient — crawlers spend their token budget on actual information. The site includes 2 schema blocks, providing adequate structured data for basic entity recognition. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

78
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (67) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 3 snapshots
Feb 23 Feb 26
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than llumar.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)67 × 0.25 = 16.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)86 × 0.40 = 34.4
⚡ Performance (20% weight)74 × 0.20 = 14.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)83 × 0.15 = 12.4
Weighted sum = 16.8 + 34.4 + 14.8 + 12.4
Global SEODiff Score = 78 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
97
Rendering
avg 93
100
Structure
avg 36
44
Schema
avg 9
65
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 38%
Rank #376088
-36 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 1%
Score 87/100

llumar.com ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 38%) than in AI search (Top 1%). This is the 'Invisible Giant' pattern — implement the patches above to close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why llumar.com ranks here

Tech stackAdobe Experience Manager
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage2 blocks
Token bloat3.5×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

67/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

57 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

149 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 2
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://llumar.com/na/en/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — LLumar Automotive and Architectural Window Film and PPF
  • ✓ og:description — LLumar's global portfolio is recognized as one of the top automotive and architectural window film brands. Explore our window film and PPF offerings.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

86/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
llumar.com
70
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 10%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 100/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 106 elements (106 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words335
Raw Density31.6%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks2 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

85
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability85/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

28%
🗑️ 72%
Useful Content (28.6 KB)Bloat (72.2 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio3.5× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context37% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage22 / 59 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Only 37% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

38 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 71.6% · SNR: 0.40 · Signal: 7321 / Noise: 18486 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score65/100
ServerApache
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time723 ms
Raw HTML Size100.8 KB
Visible Text Size28.6 KB

Performance & Speed

74/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

723 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

656
DOM nodes
101 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

83/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://llumar.com/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

99
internal links
10
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 70/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for llumar.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/llumar.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=llumar.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
70
Single-page score
-35
Severe hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
35
Avg across 10 pages · Range 34–44
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 70, but internal pages average only 35 — a -35-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Topical Cohesion
9%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
421
Avg Bloat
452.1×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://llumar.com/case-studies
Automotive and Architectural Window Film and PPF | LLumar
social-proof 44 338.5× 61
https://llumar.com/pricing
404
pricing 34 464.7× 40
https://llumar.com/about
404
about 34 464.7× 40
https://llumar.com/products
404
product 34 464.7× 40
https://llumar.com/features
404
product 34 464.7× 40
https://llumar.com/blog
404
blog 34 464.7× 40
https://llumar.com/docs
404
docs 34 464.7× 40
https://llumar.com/contact
404
support 34 464.7× 40
https://llumar.com/faq
404
support 34 464.7× 40
https://llumar.com/integrations
404
integrations 34 464.7× 40
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/pricing/ 1 34 0% 464.7× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 34 0% 464.7× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 34 0% 464.7× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 44 0% 338.5× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 34 0% 464.7× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 34 0% 464.7× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 34 0% 464.7× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 1 34 0% 464.7× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 1 34 0% 464.7× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 34 0% 464.7× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
instagram.com ×10
eastmanpf.com ×10
eastman.com ×10
llumar.com.cn ×10
youtube.com ×10
twitter.com ×10
facebook.com ×10
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/llumar.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to llumar.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
llumar.com (this site) 70 87 Adobe Experience Manager 3.5× 2
driphydration.com 86 95 WordPress 1.9× 2 Compare →
symbolonly.com 86 89 Cloudflare Pages 2.4× 3 Compare →
kondela.hu 86 93 Custom / Proprietary 3.1× 4 Compare →
tilibraexpress.com.br 87 87 Express 1.9× 3 Compare →
sigmaflows.com 88 93 Express 2.3× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to llumar.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Llumar?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Llumar does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Llumar work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Llumar."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for llumar.com:

Current Score
87
Projected Score
90
Improvement
+3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history