kurokabe.co.jp 67 C
🛡️ SEO 59 🤖 GEO 78 ⚡ Perf 49 🏗️ Arch 78

kurokabe.co.jp — Global SEODiff Score 67/100

kurokabe.co.jp
📊

Registering an exceptional 90/100 on the AI-Crawler Reality Index, kurokabe.co.jp sits in the highest tier of AI extractability among indexed domains. In the infrastructure sector, kurokabe.co.jp outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Content is delivered server-side, meaning bots and AI agents can parse the full page without executing JavaScript. With a 3.2× bloat ratio, the page delivers its content without excessive boilerplate, giving AI systems a clean extraction path. Minimal structured data (1 block) limits the site's ability to communicate entity relationships to AI systems. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

67
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (49) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 1, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 3 snapshots
Feb 23 Mar 1
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than kurokabe.co.jp?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)59 × 0.25 = 14.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)78 × 0.40 = 31.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)49 × 0.20 = 9.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)78 × 0.15 = 11.7
Weighted sum = 14.8 + 31.2 + 9.8 + 11.7
Global SEODiff Score = 67 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
100
Structure
avg 36
42
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 50%+
Rank #940888
-93 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 1%
Score 90/100

kurokabe.co.jp ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 50%+) than in AI search (Top 1%). This is the 'Visibility Gap' pattern — implementing the recommendations above can help close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why kurokabe.co.jp ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat3.2×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

59/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

67 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

357 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 3
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.kurokabe.co.jp/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — 黒壁 - 滋賀県長浜市 ガラスの街「黒壁スクエア」
  • ✓ og:description — 黒壁スクエアは、滋賀県長浜市旧市街にある、伝統的建造物群を生かした観光スポット。江戸時代から明治時代の古建築を活かしたガラスショップ、ギャラリー、ガラス工房、体験教室、レストラン、カフェ等が集積します。公式オンラインショップでお買い物も。
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

78/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
kurokabe.co.jp
69
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 100/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 63 elements (55 lists, 4 rows, 4 headers)
Total Words199
Raw Density31.7%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

86
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability86/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

31%
🗑️ 69%
Useful Content (28.0 KB)Bloat (61.2 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio3.2× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context71% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage41 / 58 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

45 Entropy
Fair Token Bloat: Medium
Noise Ratio: 68.6% · SNR: 0.46 · Signal: 7180 / Noise: 15660 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time4950 ms
Raw HTML Size89.2 KB
Visible Text Size28.0 KB

Performance & Speed

49/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

4950 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

643
DOM nodes
89 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

78/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.kurokabe.co.jp/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

85
internal links
17
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 69/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for kurokabe.co.jp
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/kurokabe.co.jp" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=kurokabe.co.jp" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to kurokabe.co.jp. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
kurokabe.co.jp (this site) 69 90 WordPress 3.2× 1
profitserver.net 86 90 WordPress 3.7× 2 Compare →
profitserver.ru 86 90 WordPress 3.8× 2 Compare →
safely.co.jp 90 90 WordPress 1.9× 3 Compare →
meriambet.us.com 87 95 WordPress 4.1× 6 Compare →
grupocasalima.com 87 96 WordPress 11.4× 5 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite kurokabe.co.jp when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history