k-wam.jp 68 C
🛡️ SEO 59 🤖 GEO 90 ⚡ Perf 27 🏗️ Arch 81

k-wam.jp — Global SEODiff Score 68/100

k-wam.jp
📊

Among all indexed domains, k-wam.jp ranks in the top echelon with an ACRI of 90, demonstrating that its content is highly visible to AI systems. Within the infrastructure vertical, this places k-wam.jp above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. A tight 2.9× token bloat ratio reflects disciplined markup: minimal noise between the crawler and the content it needs. Structured data coverage is solid at 2 blocks, covering core entities — expanding to include FAQ or Breadcrumb schemas could strengthen the profile further. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

68
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (27) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 25, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than k-wam.jp?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)59 × 0.25 = 14.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)90 × 0.40 = 36.0
⚡ Performance (20% weight)27 × 0.20 = 5.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)81 × 0.15 = 12.2
Weighted sum = 14.8 + 36.0 + 5.4 + 12.2
Global SEODiff Score = 68 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
100
Structure
avg 35
44
Schema
avg 10
85
Tech Stack
avg 64
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 50%+
Rank #734385
-72 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 1%
Score 90/100

k-wam.jp ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 50%+) than in AI search (Top 1%). This is the 'Invisible Giant' pattern — implement the patches above to close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why k-wam.jp ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage2 blocks
Token bloat2.9×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

59/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

69 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

306 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 15
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.k-wam.jp/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — 個別カリキュラムの学習塾 | 個別指導塾WAM【公式】
  • ✓ og:description — 個別指導塾WAMは、小学生・中学生・高校生に対応する個別指導の学習塾です。個別カリキュラムと地域密着指導で、成績アップ・志望校合格をサポート。自学力向上を目指し、成績保証・返金保証も完備。無料体験受付中です!
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

90/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
k-wam.jp
81
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 100/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 366 elements (333 lists, 15 rows, 18 headers)
Total Words833
Raw Density43.9%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks2 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
✅ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

86
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability86/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

34%
🗑️ 66%
Useful Content (65.4 KB)Bloat (124.0 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio2.9× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context87% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage90 / 103 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

52 Entropy
Fair Token Bloat: Medium
Noise Ratio: 65.5% · SNR: 0.53 · Signal: 16737 / Noise: 31744 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

A local LLM (mlx-community/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-4bit) analyzed the extracted content of k-wam.jp and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
個別カリキュラムによる学習塾サービス
Target Audience
小学生・中学生・高校生の保護者と生徒
Pricing Model
個別指導塾WAMの授業料
Model: mlx-community/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-4bit · Analyzed: 2026-02-26 · Data extracted from the site’s main content via strict JSON prompting.

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time2061 ms
Raw HTML Size189.4 KB
Visible Text Size65.4 KB

Performance & Speed

27/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

2061 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

2443
DOM nodes
189 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

2
tracker scripts
2
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.comfacebook.net
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

81/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.k-wam.jp/sitemap_index.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

243
internal links
17
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

✓ TOP 15% AI-READY

🏆 You Are AI-Verified — Claim Your Badge

Your site scores 81/100 on the AI-Crawler Reality Index. Embed this trust badge on your site — every click sends visitors to your verified report and builds backlinks to your domain.

AI-Verified badge for k-wam.jp
Verified — updates automatically every 24h
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/k-wam.jp" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=k-wam.jp" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

How it works: The badge queries your ACRI score daily. If your score drops below 80 or your site hasn't been scanned in 30 days, the badge changes to "Pending Audit" (yellow) — prompting you to fix issues and rescan. Learn about ACRI methodology →

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
81
Single-page score
-13
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
68
Avg across 10 pages · Range 50–70
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 81, but internal pages average only 68 — a -13-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Total Words
5464
Avg Bloat
71.2×
Ext. Citations
9
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://k-wam.jp/pricing
個別カリキュラムの学習塾 | 個別指導塾WAM【公式】
pricing 70 66.0× 588 💰 Pricing
https://k-wam.jp/about
個別カリキュラムの学習塾 | 個別指導塾WAM【公式】
pricing 70 66.0× 588 💰 Pricing
https://k-wam.jp/products
個別カリキュラムの学習塾 | 個別指導塾WAM【公式】
pricing 70 66.0× 588 💰 Pricing
https://k-wam.jp/features
個別カリキュラムの学習塾 | 個別指導塾WAM【公式】
pricing 70 66.0× 588 💰 Pricing
https://k-wam.jp/docs
個別カリキュラムの学習塾 | 個別指導塾WAM【公式】
pricing 70 66.0× 588 💰 Pricing
https://k-wam.jp/blog
個別カリキュラムの学習塾 | 個別指導塾WAM【公式】
pricing 70 66.0× 588 💰 Pricing
https://k-wam.jp/case-studies
個別カリキュラムの学習塾 | 個別指導塾WAM【公式】
pricing 70 66.0× 588 💰 Pricing
https://k-wam.jp/integrations
個別カリキュラムの学習塾 | 個別指導塾WAM【公式】
pricing 70 66.0× 588 💰 Pricing
https://k-wam.jp/contact
個別カリキュラムの学習塾 | 個別指導塾WAM【公式】
pricing 70 66.0× 588 💰 Pricing
https://k-wam.jp/faq
よくあるご質問 | 学習塾なら個別指導塾WAM
support 50 118.1× 172
🔗
Outbound External Citations
9 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
hmgroup.co.jp ×10
privacymark.jp ×10
youtube.com ×9
purasuta.jp ×9
katekyo.wam.onl ×9
wam.onl ×9
ib-onl.com ×9
tiktok.com ×9
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/k-wam.jp

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to k-wam.jp. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
k-wam.jp (this site) 81 90 WordPress 2.9× 2
mrwallpaper.com 81 83 WordPress 3.0× 2 Compare →
kawashima-ya.jp 81 84 WordPress 2.7× 2 Compare →
sirphire.com 82 90 WordPress 3.1× 2 Compare →
toiretumari-center.com 81 90 WordPress 3.7× 2 Compare →
groepen.nl 82 90 WordPress 3.3× 2 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to k-wam.jp. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "K-wam",
  "url": "https://k-wam.jp",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://k-wam.jp/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for k-wam.jp:

Current Score
90
Projected Score
94
Improvement
+4 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history